- 最后登录
- 2018-6-9
- 在线时间
- 383 小时
- 寄托币
- 1688
- 声望
- 3
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-4
- 阅读权限
- 35
- 帖子
- 12
- 精华
- 1
- 积分
- 1669
- UID
- 2358398
- 声望
- 3
- 寄托币
- 1688
- 注册时间
- 2007-7-4
- 精华
- 1
- 帖子
- 12
|
题目:ISSUE26 - "Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."
字数:637 用时:00:45:00 日期:2007-8-8 22:39:51
1,如果旧建筑的价值超过了新建筑的时候,应该保留
2如果新的建筑的需求和作用比旧的建筑大,旧建筑应该被拆除.
3还有一种解决方法就是改造旧的房屋以作它用.
In the epoch of rapid development, new buildings are mushrooming in this era because of people' large demands. However controversial question emerge when the old buildings encumber the construction of the new. In my point of view, to preserve the old or to destroy them for the new is a complicated and intricate question which depends on the value of the old and the necessity of the new.
To begin with, the old building with extraordinary value in culture or arts, which excesses the value of the new building to be constructed, should not be replaced by the new. As is known to all, architectures play an important role in preserve culture and individuality of one nation. An old building records much information about the past which is very important and precious for the study of the constructing skills, culture, and morality at that time. For instance, the pyramids in Egypt over 3000 years ago tell us much information about that time. They record the values on what populace in ancient Egypt thought about live and death, the mirage skills in constructing and the antique in it provides important data for research ancient culture. In this case, pyramids represent a whole history of the grand ancient Egypt which cannot be destroyed for other uses. Another example is the Forbidden City in Beijing, China. The Forbidden City is the relics of the Ming and Qing palace which preserve much information about the history. Due to the thoughts that the palace for empire should be in the center of Beijing and the palace cannot be visited by populace, the Forbidden City, which lies in the center, separates Beijing to two parts. The east and west part cannot connect well because populace is not allowed to cross the palace which leads to the detour. Even the palace cause so much troubles, Chinese still would break it down because it is a precious legacy that our ancestors leave for us.
To the contrary, if the old architect is not as important as the new buildings, giving precedence to modern development is an advisable and acceptable choice. For example the old building has fewer characteristics or there are many coeval building around meanwhile the new building is used for hospital or education which is emergent for residents. In these cases when the value of the new excesses the old, the old should be destroyed to make this area available for the new.
Nevertheless, is there a better choice for this dilemma when the old building is as important as the old? In my point of view, to redesign may be a solution. Destroy the old and construct a new one will cost much money. If we can redesign the old and adapt it to the new function, the preservation of the old and the emergent need for the new can be solved at one time. For example, the old baiyun airport, in Guangzhou city China, is deserted when the new one begins to serve. Considering this old airport witness the large development in this city, it would not be destroyed but be redesigned for new purose. Now its terminal tower is planned to be used for a market and other part would be used for several functions else after being renewed. In this case, both the value of the old and the need for are resolved perfectly meanwhile this method saves myriad money.
In sum, whether to preserve the old or to construct the new is a complex question which needs our deliberation. This issue should be treated specially rather than generally or in other word it is a case-by-case problem based on the value and consequence of each choice. Moreover, reconstructing the old building for new function is a new way out when it comes to the green and economy society.(不知道节约型社会是否这么翻译.....)
还有10天就要考了,这个水平够么?作文虽然是45min内完成,但是写之前思考了很久,不知道大家写限时作文是不是连想带写一共45min? 留链接必回拍哦!!!!!!!
谢谢大家了,我还有个问题就是,我的B3算不算走题了?因为B3的ts的意思好像没有包括在我的总的ts里面,即我第一段总的ts写的是"要不要拆取决于房子的重要性"而B3的ts却是"改造旧房子也是个不错的方法",有走题否?????????
[ 本帖最后由 zhoumax 于 2007-8-10 23:30 编辑 ] |
|