[i习作temp] 第一次写作，敬请指教（Issue 1） [复制链接]

谦虚的小公鸡
UID：2961678

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 10
寄托币: 666
注册时间: 2010-11-23
精华: 0
帖子: 40

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2011-1-23 14:03:47 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

1. We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
喔喔喔

The speaker's estimation seems to be a natural deduction, but I do deem it hazardous as this estimation is on suspicion of pandering to the favor of egocentrics. Those who hold the speaker's view, in my opinion, are in danger of being compromised.

Some people who are advocating the speaker's view proclaim that it is more harmonious in an ambience with agreements than in an environment with clashed opinions. I do not deny that agreements can create a harmony circumstance, but no evidence indicates that clashed opinions are doomed to lead to a bad environment. So the comparison is unfair.

Other egocentrics may conclude that disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning. Then what are you pursuing, correctness or temporary equipoise? Appearently those who hold that view don't know which is more important. Anyway, disagreement does not perforce arouse stress. It is the decision of the person involved. Apropos of the latter stuff, stress (not disagreement) may lead to reluctance for learning, but that is what a person need to learn to slog away under unfavorable auspices.

After refuting the speaker's opinions, I'm really curious to know how a person would judge the accuracy of a certain thing in the ambience with only agreements because appearently everyone in that place is speaking univocally. Therefore, he/she can only get one answer. How could one answer makes a difference? It is just like finding oil or mineral underground by seismic exploration, in which case you can't get the information of underground velocities with only one certain offset, that is, without all offset information. (The offset is the distance between the shot place and the geophone's place.)

Then we can conclude that agreements don't promise the correctness. Concerning that, there is a famous anecdote indicating this judgement. In Ancient China, an chancellor told the king a story. "When I was wending my way here, I met a man. He said that there was a tiger at the plaza. Do you believe it, your majesty?" The king laughed and said, "How could it be? The plaza is full of people trading." The chancellor went on, "Neither did I. I sneered and went away. But later on a second man came and shouted, 'There is a tiger at the plaza!' Do you believe it, your majesty?" The king thought for a while and said, "I'm going to dither." "That was also my feeling," said the chancellor. "I dithered for a while, but I didn't believe it. So I went away. But a few minutes later another man came and told be there was a tiger at the plaza. What's your opinion now, my king?" The king replied, "I believe it." "So did I," the chancellor smiled, "but later I discovered that there was actually no tiger. So it was a canard." This anecdote insinuates that what many people agree with is not always the fact. But be aware that I'm not alleging that contradicting views ensures correctness. Contradicting views are only providing a larger possiblity to uncover the reality.

Besides, different opinions enable us to look into something in a new perspective which provides an overall panorama for us, which also contributes to the possibility of getting the correct answer and making the right decision. Wu Zetian, the sole female king in Chinese history, perfectly exemplified this point. In her early times she was adept at hearkening to different opinions. During that era the country was booming in every aspect. But in her elder times she became dubious and stubborn, which almost led to the crash of the whole dynasty.

By contrast, people who share our view probably have nothing new to contribute except "confidence." We know thoughts need refreshing,and that is what clashed opinions can do. Conspicously, confidence can't do that.

In sum, we can learn more from contradicting views. and I believe t is the step we should take to convince everybody of it in order to make him/her learn more and accept more clashed ideas. Only in that case would the brainstorm occur and new thought be given birth to.

相关帖子

喔喔

回应
0

使用道具举报

xzm110
UID：2775495

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 34
寄托币: 1233
注册时间: 2010-3-6
精华: 0
帖子: 77

沙发

发表于 2011-1-23 14:29:54 |只看该作者

楼主看看高频顺序按那个准备吧，最好别按书上的顺序。即使是argument也有高频一说。

使用道具举报

wdvrdx111
UID：2870800

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 25
寄托币: 708
注册时间: 2010-8-3
精华: 0
帖子: 15

板凳

发表于 2011-1-23 14:30:28 |只看该作者

本帖最后由 wdvrdx111 于 2011-1-23 14:31 编辑

例证方面没必要这么罗嗦·其实就是一个故事，提取下概要即可·然后尽可能每个论点都能有例子支撑，草草的带过去不太好·还有，红宝单词慎用，感觉用词很浮躁，内容远比不上辞藻，毕竟AW作文最关键的还是看逻辑和例证。不过第一篇就写成这样也可以了，慢慢摸索吧·

使用道具举报

谦虚的小公鸡
UID：2961678

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 10
寄托币: 666
注册时间: 2010-11-23
精华: 0
帖子: 40

地板

发表于 2011-1-23 20:06:16 |只看该作者

本帖最后由谦虚的小公鸡于 2011-1-23 20:19 编辑

3# wdvrdx111

红宝单词大部分我都查阅并记载过过用法和例句，因此使用上应该不至于有太大语法问题
内容方面，还是自己积累太少啊，想了半天才想出这几个例子，不得已还缀上了专业课的基础知识……
看来我得多准备点例子了。
谢谢你的指教！

喔喔

使用道具举报