寄托天下
查看: 1303|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[其他法域] Question about Hearsay [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
35
寄托币
220
注册时间
2010-5-27
精华
0
帖子
17

US-applicant

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-7 00:19:49 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
P sued D, a restaurant, claims that she became seriously ill after eating barbecue shrimp there. The attorney of D offers the testimony of the maitre, who will testify that none of the other guests who also ate a serving of barbecue shrimp on the night in question complained of illness. P's attorney objects. The judge should rule that the testimony is:
(a)not hearsay
(b) inadmissible hearsay
(c)admissible hearsay under rule 803(1)
(d)admissible hearsay under rule 803(4)
(e) admissible under rule 801(d)(2)

另外,如果A drive's statement about his faultis admissible under Rule 801(d)(2)(D) :the statement is offered against a party and is (d)a statement by the party's agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment. 那么是否也可以说是admissible under 801(d)(2)(A): the party's own statement, in either an individual or a representative capacity?
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: Question about Hearsay [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Question about Hearsay
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1320539-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部