- 最后登录
- 2015-4-12
- 在线时间
- 650 小时
- 寄托币
- 990
- 声望
- 44
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-6
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 214
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 671
- UID
- 2678347
- 声望
- 44
- 寄托币
- 990
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 214
|
MEMO
44) Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim.
原思路:
Thesis Sentence: As for those false heroes who behave in different ways in different circumstances, regarding them as role models definitely will destroy people’s belief on them; choosing those living men or women who are consistent in their behavior, however, can help people learn better from them. Media scrutiny is not a way to destroy living heroes but a way to bring real heroes to public view.
TS1: As for living men or women who are inconsistent, admittedly their reputation will be diminished under media scrutiny, and thus, they are not the appropriate candidates for role models in a society.
(对表里不一的所谓“典范”,确实存在reason陈述的问题,所以把这些人当成典范会mislead people。譬如尼克松水门事件,在此之前人们相信尼克松是伟大的领袖,在大选中尼克松获得民意支持成功连任总统,在水门事件爆发之初,尼克松甚至还不承认自己有窃听行为,媒体曝光的事实让其声望迅速下滑,最终走下神坛,成为美国历史上第一个连任后被迫请辞的总统)
TS2: As for living men or women who has inner beauty, however, their reputation will not be diminished in the spotlight and even will be enhanced because more details about their real lives make people believe the existence of real heroes, thus more people will learn from them for good behaviors.
(真正内外兼修的典范,如姚明,参加公益事件,参加热门娱乐秀,更贴近民众,有活生生的例子在前,给人们更多学习的范本,人们会从中主动学习)
TS3: Moreover, appropriate media scrutiny, actually, help us find real heroes, and it is an effective way to investigate heroes’ behavior, making it possible to select living people as heroes.
(典范本来就应该是经得起考验的,媒体的存在是对公众人物的监督)
原思路存在问题:
有点回避问题,问的是living heroes而这里是抛出真假英雄的概念
讨论后思路:
参见王老师6分楼范文
1. 娱乐和运动
2. 政治
3. 对可能的challenge回应
140楼
With the development of the Internet and the social media, the private lives of celebrities are being scrutinised and talked about by ordinary people all the time. Therefore, it is argued that people can no longer regard the living celebrities as heroes given so much information about their not so honourable private lives. I would agree that this is indeed the case in the field of entertainment, sports and politics. Some people may argue that celebrities with lifelong achievements in entertainments and sports may still be regarded as heroes. But with the social media more interested in celebrities in their prime time, the older celebrities would only receive much attention when they pass away.
I agree that it is no longer possible to consider celebrities in the fields of entertainment and sports as heroes because they are often young and rich facing temptations in their private lives. Consider the case of Tiger Woods, the heroic figure in professional golf. While Woods was often regarded as the greatest contemporary golf player and a hero in the field, his reputation was severely undermined after his scandal of extramarital affair. Stories of fallen heroes who were young, talented and well-regarded are commonplace because it was more difficult for them to discipline themselves when they could do anything they like with the money and fame.
It is equally difficult, if not impossible, for people to idolise political leaders these days. President Clinton was widely regarded as a competent leader of the US bringing great economic prosperity to nation plagued by economic aftermath left by President Bush. Yet, he was not a perfect man and made mistakes that gave opportunities to his political enemies to exploit leading to the infamous scandal of Monica Lewinsky. Even if a majority of Americans are willing to forgive Mr. Clinton’s misconduct, it is nearly impossible to count him among the great US presidents such as Abraham Lincoln and John Kennedy.
Some people may challenge my argument by pointing out that older celebrities in these fields may be regarded as heroes considering their lifelong achievements. Figures like Robin Williams and Woody Allen, for example, may be considered heroes in the movie industry in the light of their numerous accomplishments throughout their lives. This may indeed be the case. But we need to bear in mind that, in today’s social media as well as traditional media, attention is often given disproportionately to the celebrities in their prime time. People are more interested in news and gossips about Jennifer Lawrence and Ellen Page than the biographies of Mike Douglas or Steve Martin.
Given the limited space, I only address this issue with regard to the celebrities in fields of entertainment, sports and politics. But the points I try to make may be applicable to other fields as well: celebrities in their prime time often could neither resist the temptations that arise from their fame and wealth nor avoid the attacks from their enemies; as a result, it is difficult for them to be regarded as heroes; for the older celebrities with lifelong accomplishments, they were often forgotten by the general public until the day they pass away. |
|