TOPIC: ISSUE83 - "Government should preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state, even though these areas are often extremely remote and thus accessible to only a few people."
WORDS: 225 TIME: 0:60:12 DATE: 2007-3-25
Government should not preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state.
First of all, wilderness areas are often desolate, so if government wants to preserve them, it will expend a lot of money. Those areas are accessible to only a few people, when government is preserving them, it should hire many persons and build or rent house for them. Besides, even if government preserves these areas well, what will they give people? People will get little. So that government preserves publicly owed wildness areas will not the effect.
Secondly, the resource of government is definite. Government can not use the resource for every thing, It is necessary to spend the money on the right thing. Government should maximize the part that its resource plays in economics, culture and politics, Government should primarily satisfy people’s need, then it can consider other things.
Thirdly, government can preserve wilderness areas, but it may not be the moment. Only when the country’s development has arrived at that degree of thriving and prosper, government may begin to preserve publicly owned wilderness areas. In short, the prosperity of country is the premise of preserve wilderness areas.
In sum, it is first and foremost to satisfy people’s need for economics, culture and politics. Before the country’s development arrives at the degree of flourish, government should not preserve publicly and wilderness areas.
Government should not preserve publicly owned wilderness areas in their natural state.(言简意赅,好!但是如果怕字数不都的话可以再添一两句,比如先引用,再反对。纯属个人建议)
First of all, wilderness areas are often desolate, so if(英语里好像没这么说的) government wants to preserve them, it will expend a lot of money. Those areas are accessible to only a few people, when government is preserving them, it should hire many persons and build or rent house(s) for them. Besides, even if government preserves these areas well, what will they give people?(what benefit will people gain from doing that) People will get little. So that government preserves publicly owed wildness areas will not (make) the effect.
Secondly, the resource of government is definite(有点Chinglish的感觉,不如换成limited). Government can not use the resource for every thing, It is necessary to spend the money on the right thing. Government should maximize the part in that its resource plays in economics, culture and politics,(能读懂,但是感觉比较别扭) Government should firstly primarily satisfy people’s need(去掉’s need), then it can(可去掉) consider other things.
Thirdly, government can preserve wilderness areas, but it may not be (at) the moment. Only when the country’s development has arrived at that degree of thriving and prosper, government may begin to preserve publicly owned wilderness areas.(Only when the country develops to a high lever of wealth and prosperity, could the government begin to…… ) In short, the prosperity of country is the premise of preserve wilderness areas.
In sum, it is first and foremost to satisfy people’s needfor(on)economics , culture and politics. Before the country’s development arrives at the degree of flourish, government should not preserve publicly and wilderness areas.