- 最后登录
- 2014-6-27
- 在线时间
- 209 小时
- 寄托币
- 316
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2012-3-20
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 140
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 420
- UID
- 3277513
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 316
- 注册时间
- 2012-3-20
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 140
|
本帖最后由 冬涧苦雪 于 2012-8-8 12:23 编辑
8.7 习作
Issue49
Does opponents' idea deter one's progress? Does supporters' idea help one's advancement? Though it is possible, never comes it for sure.
Initially, we should admit that there is such a possibility that the same ideas and positive critics can help progress, while different opinions inhabit from advancing. This phenomenon comes from humans' nature that approaching to the advantage and avoiding from the disadvantage. That is to say, when a person gets appreatiation towards their struggle from others, they tend to fell satisfied and desire to go on and obtain more agreements. And at the same time, their confidence and interest on this field which he or she is working on will be escalated. Then getting progress is a normal thing. On the other hand, when harsh and severe reactions flush into one's mind, there is a very strong psychological reflection that he has no gift on this area or get more and more confused on teh way to progress. Thus, it do make sense to construct a positive relationship between others' opinions and the condition of one's progress.
However, even though the assertion appears to happen in the reality, it is never certain to say that opponent's ideas can prevent one from progressing.
For one thing, what the press from disagreement will affect has something to do with one's attitude towards them. To the optimists, stress may represent motivation. With the failure, stronger determination, courage, and new ideas about how to promote will come together. But to the pessimists, counterviews are direct cause of suspicion, disappointments and even stop. Actually, it's the pessimistic attitude and vulnerable self that beat them, rather than others' ideas.
For another thing, what cannot be omitted is the active effect to progress. Just like one important principle in Maxims’ philosophy, a contradiction is the source of progress. People get larger opportunity to do better after considering various opinions including mass negative voices. After all, in the procedure of wording hard, one apt to be more and more confident in the pattern of him, ignoring a lot of normal and even obvious mistakes. Only with the help of others' critics, can one get clear with the fault. One practical experience of my friend, Lisa just demonstrates the point. Based on exceptional rich experience on making magazines, Lisa gets a internship chance as iebook editor in a famous magazine company. When she shows the first sample edition to her friend, surprisingly, handful of defects came except for the merits. After negotiating with her friend and correcting it carefully, the edition was passed smoothly. Just think about it, where is the success of the first sample without the opponents' suggestions? So, even good advices are harsh to the ear, progress often come after them.
Eventually, there is one significant point. Even though different ideas prevent one from advancing, it doesn't mean people will advance in agreements. In the fact, progression has matter with many elements beyond others' idea, such as gift, psychological quality, and degree of struggling, working conditions. With the synthesis function with all the factors can help one to advance.
Thus, for improving, one should set up a strong inner spirit, rather than dependent on others' views. The ability of analysis and insistent is really crucial to get substantial progress.
|
|