Making decisions is the most common affair as leaders. However, sometimes their decisions may be unwelcome, and even suffer from assault. In that case, what (should) the leaders should do would reflect how the leaders are-whether they are qualified or not. In my opinion, an excellent leader should be one who consistently committed to particular principles and objectives, {however, sometimes especially when he/she commits mistakes, he/she should quickly and easily change the decision according to popular view.}这个观点不合适,应该是when the popular view is right or better than the decision of himself / herself, he should quickly and easily change the decision.To begin with, consistently committing to particular objectives and principles is one excellent quality as a leader. First, he/she has the ability to be as a leader, such as the intelligence and spirit of hard working, and so forth. Thus, people who elect him/her have showed their trust to him/her that he/she has capacity to lead them and make decisions. Meanwhile, a leader more often is compared to the captain of a ship. His/her decision about direction will determine where the ship is going, which asks him/her to have firm stand. Take the purchase of Alaska for example. At that time, when Seward decided to buy Alaska at the price of 7$, American people all thought he was crazy, and condemned him to waste their tax money. Also, at one time, this deal was called "Seward 's folly" while Alaska was called " Seward 's icebox". However, history has indicated that Andreas has made a good and wonderful decision-as gold measure especially when petroleum are found abundant in Alaska. If Andrea, at that time, gave up his decision due to the critique of populous, when these treasures were found by E, he would get another critique that he did not consistently committing to his particular objectives and principles. Accordingly, an effective leader should commit to particular principles and objectives consistently, which is a most essential quality as a leader.In the second place stands another example, which is representative to show committing consistently to particular principles and objectives is a most essential quality of an effective leader. Most Chinese people nowadays should still remember Zhu Rongji-Chinese former premier, who is ever considered somewhat the strictest leader in China. When he was in charge, the system of Chinese economy began to work less effectively-because of the swollen government bureaucracies and its owned companies. (the tremendous constitutions of this system and its companies. )In that case, he carried out the lay off policy, which brought him more condemnation than praise. As the debut of this policy, many workers lost their jobs, and thus many of them went to Tiananmen (to) and seated there to show their dissatisfaction. However, premier Zhu wasn't scared by these people's action and held on his policy firmly. Now many years later, the development of Chinese economy and living standards of Chinese people have substantiated that premier Zhu did a rather good job. Thus, remaining consistently committed to particular principles and objectives cannot be denied the most essential quality of an effective leader.However, when it comes to some clearly and obviously mistakes, leaders should change their decision. This contention reminds the situation faced by Chinese leaders when SARS was rampant in some regions of China, especially Guangzhou and Pecking. At the very beginning, some leaders (wanted to cheat)// wrongly recognized that it is just a kind of flu and announce Chinese people and other countries that no SARS was in China. Even many doctors answer back his fault action; still such leaders did not change their decision. Finally, when as more and more people knew the truth and showed their dissatisfaction, and certain Chinese leaders had to give way to people's critique which in the end were punished by Chinese government, some bad aftermath had been done for the slower attention of the government—SARS became epidemic and many people were affected. In this respect, the leaders should investigate his decision at any moment, and when there are flaws in decision, quickly and easily changing of the decision should be given.
In conclusion, whether or not remaining consistently committed to particular principles and objectives needs leaders to strike a balance-no matter how, should be beneficial for the ship in the correct direction.
总体上这篇文章比较成功,组织的很合理
缺点就是你的however…..,例子不很合适。
我把你的例子稍微修改了下,你看看合适不? |