0910G SPECTACULAR 备考日志 by juventusland[洋彼岸之风]--just treat as a game

juventuslandUID：2631955

一个大二的学生就要准备GRE，真不容易啊。这是很多同学跟我说的，曾经犹豫过，也犹豫从1月考试背红宝是否太早，怕停不下来了。前天终于报完名，心也定了，想起最近因为考试都没怎么复习，突然觉得有种紧迫感。
     呼呼，加入作文小组还是感觉到一份压力啊。作文一直是我的弱项，习惯了4 6级作文，在半个月前考试看作文大讲堂时，不由得头晕目眩无奈放弃。拖了几天才逼自己写了第一篇ISSUE，但实在是很不满意。可以说，AW也是我最怕的一部分了，希望今后自己不断加油，在大侠们的帮助之下稳步前进，我也会好好努力地。由于此前没怎么准备作文，希望从6月开始，每两天至少一篇ISSUE（6月份考试很多，比较忙），争取慢慢学会帮人改作文，作文确实是我的弱项，我会通过我的努力来弥补和大家的差距的，还准备阅读GRE难句。每天看ECONOMIST一篇S T。同时不忘红宝。。
个人格言：God never closes a window without opening another.
理想分数：issue 5,argument 5.但ISSUE 4 我也满意了。V 600+ Q 800(理想的~）
  接受各位的监督，共同努力。为AW好成绩奋斗

juventuslandUID：2631955

The argument, seems logical, that adopting honor codes similar to Groveton’s is very useful to solve the problem that cheating rises among collage and university students because of the surveys about the declining cases of cheating in Groveton in recent years.
     However, Is that cheating cases decline in recent years in Groveton just because it adopts honor codes?Should the possibility of cheating is less be detected because students are not closed monitored as the use of honor codes be ignored because it is not unreliable? The survey just stated that the cases of cheating have declined in recent years,Which can not prove fewer cheating behaviors in Groveton.The less strict surveillance and the new implements help cheat also can cause the result.
    Secondly,the students in the survey should be able to represent all levels.Unfotunately,we fail to find no sign for random sampling. Maybe the students in the survey are better students and harder-workings,so that they are less likely to cheat in tests as the are more confident. Or the majority of the students in the survey come from prestigious universities which offer better education.So the survey can not support evidence to the argument evidence.
    Even assuming that the survey can truly reflect the effects in recent years after adopting honor codes and the fewer cases of cheating reflect fewer cheating behaviors,which means the “honor codes” is effective in Groveton, the arguer doesn’t consider the differences among different places and the characteristics  of students in Groveton.Maybe in Groveton the  moral lessons are widely opened help students there know the importance of integrity so that when they prove they never cheat, they will less likely cheat. And maybe the students in Groveton will be more strictly punished than other areas so students are afraid of being caught in cheating.So even “honor codes” is really effective in Geoveton,It may not bring about the same good results in other areas
    In sum,it seems reasonable to adopt “honor codes” in other areas because the results of adopting “honor codes” is that cheating cases declined in Groveton after adopting it.However,before making final deteminations,we should think about other possible alternatives can lead to the results and the possible narrow limitation of the adoption.

juventuslandUID：2631955

作文两天内完成，恩。。给自己压力。。。去抓紧时间看2单元红宝

juventuslandUID：2631955

13Many of the world’s lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them.The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to from prevent such languages from be coming extinct.总频第48
关键词：being lost ,fewer speak them.government prevent
关键是政府应该，在论证时不要偏题了。
分论点1：确实很多语言，即方言。已经地球上消失了，当今也有数千种语言濒临灭绝。语言灭绝的一个主要是语言圈的缩小，还有一个重要的原因是，随着时代发展，信息交流越来越重要，这样国家就会推广用的更广泛的语言，来取代各种方言。这样的结果就是很多后代接受了统一语言而忽视了方言的学习，而很多语言只在很少的人群中说，如一个地区或者一个部落，当这些地方的语言并没有很好的传承，随着长辈们的逝去，使用这些语言的越来越少，濒临灭绝了。
分论点2：每一种语言都代表着人们丰富的文化积淀，每一种语言都有其文化和历史特色。保护这些语言对我们研究语言文化，和了解使用这种语言的人群的特点等有重要的意义。因此，政府有责任来采取措施避免它们的灭绝。比如可以成立专门研究那些语言文献和语言文化的机构。还可以在学校设立方言班，让对此感兴趣的人学习这门语言等等做法。总之，政府做这些事无疑是积极的，政府做法是一种有积极地领导作用，更进一步提高人们对方言的保护意识
分论点3：在这个信息时代，沟通确实是必要的。因此，我们必须要做到方言和官方语言的同时发展。。比如鼓励年轻一代学习方言，让他们体味其中的语言文化。也同时在全国推行官方语言。鼓励老一代把他们所会的方言教给后人或者给学者留下记录。
总之，政府有责任保护那些越来越少人说的方言。
120 So much is new and complex today that looking back for an understanding of the past provides little guidance for living in the present.
社会 总频排14啊，社会类最高的。。
关键词：new and complex ,look back，guidance
历史是明镜，这个论点当然是要反对的。。
1：现在的社会确实处于快速发展的阶段。各种新科技和复杂精妙的技术为人类的生活带来了很大的便利，提高的人们的生活水平。
2：然而这不意味着我们就可以忽视过去。。。首先，我们现在所有的新成就都是经过历史上不断地错误，修改，错误，再修正，成功的过程的。对过去的失败进行反思，往往能避免犯同样的错。对过去的研究方法进行学习，往往能发现新的灵感。对现代的科学发展也有着重要作用
3再者，对过去的研究方法进行学习，往往能发现新的灵感。对现代的科学发展也有着重要作用。很多成就都是从前人的成果上得来的。。。天王星，海王星，闵王星的相继发现。。。
4我们要做的，就是要对过去的历史进行学习，更好的与当今的社会需要结合起来。利用历史上先进的地方，结合现代科学的优势。加速科学的发展。


48"The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."历史类 总频排第三。。。
关键词：individual group.
分论点1：确实历史研究有注重个人的现象。。注重个人，往往在学习历史时，某个特定人物作为一个代表或者一个典范，他们的事例更加鲜活，更能激起人们对于历史研究的兴趣。
分论点2：在重大历史中，那些重要的历史人物是作为领袖出现的，他们的事迹和思想等都当时广泛的传播是广大群体的代表。。因此，研究个人对于研究特定的那段历史有重大意义。
分论点3：然而事实上，领袖人物虽然起着领导核心的作用，但是他的基础是支持他的整个众人呢。众人默默地做出对历史的贡献。当我们在宣扬一些伟人做出了巨大贡献时，忘记了很多人做出的同样也很重要的贡献（或许就死因为贡献没伟人们大）而忘记他们是很不公平的
升华：总之，历史是由许许多多的重大事件和发展构成的，而这些并不只是由一些伟大的个人所能完成的，在我们研究和宣扬他们的伟大贡献和思想时，不能忽视更广大的历史众人也在作出贡献，

juventuslandUID：2631955

先发3篇提纲，晚上再完成3篇，ARGUMENT会晚几天。。。词汇肯定完不成。。。考试太忙了。

11"All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."总频107 国际类
关键词Global（全球性的，全球化的） engage (着手，接受，参与)
分析思路：这是一个SHOULD型论题，但却一点都不必IS型的好写。。
思路思路啊。。。。这篇好难。。
分论点1：什么是全球性的大学，全球性大学就是大学中注重的更是关系到世界性的问题和为培养以后解决全球性问题的人才。比如温室效应，臭氧层空洞。。。局部战争。。。
分论点2：更重要的是，它能帮我们解决现在我们面临的根本问题。RECESSION。如何走出经济危机，是现在全世界最为关心也是最根源的问题，走出经济危机加快世界发展是所有人的梦想。而全球性大学可以培养这样的人才。
分论点3：虽然全球性大学的作用是很大的，但是目前为止还没有哪所学校可以称为真正的全球性大学。这也从侧面反映了建立全球性大学的艰难。它需要很严格的师资配置，需要好的外部合作和经济支持，需要扩大影响力吸引最优秀的全球学生。因此，建造这样的一个大学无疑是有很大挑战的。
要我写这篇的话就完了。。。我都不知道怎么解释GLOBAL这个词的内涵。。。而且感觉同生活相差很远，又 由于是一种理想，不容易找出例子。。。。话说MIT向全球公开课程算是GLOBAL的一种行为吗？

17"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."总频120 社会类
关键词：obey just laws  more importantly  disobey and resist unjust laws
重述作者观点，但需要给UNJUST AND JUST LAWS下定义
First,what are just laws and unjust laws?each person is a different one,and they have different values and moral outlook.Laws can not satisfy everyone.法律说到底是维护公民利益，保持社会秩序安定。所以如果以人们自己的思想来判断公正与不公正与否，那么法律就无法有一个明确的判断标准，就达不到规范人的目的。因此公正的法律即是那些能起着良好的作用（安定社会，规范秩序，人民利益）由国家立法制经过考验的法律，不公正的法律则是现行的那些有明显疏漏和错误，或者明显偏袒某部分人而失去了公平的法律。
   OK感觉这样思路就清晰了
分论点2：对于公正的法律，人们必须要服从它。因为它的存在是经受住考验过的，一定是有利于社会。即使它不符合他的期望，或者影响了他的利益，也应该去遵守它，并且努力改变自己的观点和做法适应和遵守法律而不是反对。因为只有法律在人们身上得到越好的贯彻，法律的规范作用就体现的越明显，
分论点3：然而一些时候，国家制定的法律确是有明显的错误的。而这些错误的发现都是在法律的实践过程中由人们发现的。人们发现这种不公正的法律不利于规范社会秩序和保障人民利益。然后提出异议和反对，国家立法机关接受到人们的意愿后进行修改甚至废除。因此可见，人们对于不公正法律的反对是有很重要的作用的
分论点4：这与法律的严谨是不矛盾的。就是因为需要严谨的法律，因此必须赋予它一定得可塑性，因为法律并不是一开始就是一个成熟的体系，而是需要不断发展和完善的。只有越来越完善的法律，才能体现其尊严和严谨的特点。

26"Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."总频 71 历史类
好长的题目啊。。。
关键词：valuable record  modern purposes  precedence
在一些能更好的应用到现在规划上的古建筑地，应该用来实现现实需要而不是保存古代建筑。。。我强烈反对哇。。
这里的定义都很明确，范围也很明确，下定义就不是很需要了。
分论点1：古建筑确实是一种对古代社会的有价值意义历史记录。。。。在古建筑上能看到历史的痕迹和人们思想的结晶。。。中国的长城就体现了古代的历史，反映了当时抵御外敌的历史和当时人们的高超建筑技术，对研究中国历史有重要参考价值。埃及金字塔反映了古埃及人们的神秘思想和当时人们已经有丰富的几何学知识。。。等等。。。
分论点2：这么一些有价值的建筑是历史的瑰宝，它们的破坏是不可修复的。。因此不能就因为现在化建设的需要来破坏古建筑，或许现代化得建设能带来一定得经济利益。但同时由于破坏古建筑而造成的损失是难以衡量的，因为古建筑不仅是具有历史参考价值，更有着其内在的文明价值，精神价值。它们还能代表一个国家的历史和作为一个国家的标志象征，如美国自由女神像。。不仅是作为一个世界文明的景观，更重要的是，它已经是美国明主和自由精神的一种象征。另外，古建筑也是吸引发展旅游业地一个重要方式，而古建筑旅游业的发展，也意味着对古建筑历史和国家文化的世界范围的传播。
分论点3：当然，现代的发展也是很重要的。毕竟它更贴近我们的生活，因此要做到保护古建筑文明和发展现代化的合理兼顾和规划。。比如可以再古建筑群周围建造现在化建筑。对于一些分散的小的建筑，可以考虑用现在技术搬迁到一个集中地地方来保护等等。总而言之，我们也不能因为为了保护古建筑而完全舍弃当前的发展

juventuslandUID：2631955

恩，多谢XIAOWANG~~回你的PS哦。。。第一句确实是我没仔细看。然后后面我还是建议不用倒装，句子本身并不是很长，很多GRE难句是为了节省篇幅才这样干的~~。。我的建议而已哈~

xiaoxiaoWUID：2611108

19# juventusland
"It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders（政治领袖） to withhold information from the public."

    The author claims that as desirable 这个词是形容leaders的做法的 不是形容人。 political leaders,they nevertell all information to the public.I essentially？essentially？词义不对 应该是absolutely吧 agree with it.
    There are no political leaders who are so honest that they nevertell lies.这是一个双重否定，同时是一个很短的意思 但你用了两个从句来表达，显得句式繁琐 莫不如用一个简单句来表达。They succeed in the competition for the position bysatisfying most citizens’ want both with （with both
)both 是修饰后面的成分的physical andmoral  support.They know how to concede（conceal） some information and tell whitelies to gain more votes before they become leaders到这里逻辑还好.When they shouldbear responsibilities as political leaders.（？）有问题Keeping the public fromknowing？ some information which指代不明确 is for the purpose of making the societystable看到这里你是想用个主语从句，但是前面没有that becomes necessary by all apearences.？
什么意思？这句的逻辑开始混乱 于前文和题目连接生硬Sometimes  they can preventpanic from spreading  uncontrollably by withholding information viatelling white lies.If they tell everything they know,the informationmay be contorted by some media or some groups of conspirations 我觉得这两个s加多了，有一个足够tomislead citizens. For example,the H1N1  influenza epidemic spreads overthe world.The government should  not exaggerate its threateningwhich  may roll the society,what is worse,该是另一句了or instance,what will happenif everyone knows the government will lead a stealth to destroy aterrorist base or  to assassinate someone?对题目的概括是telling lies，概括的不好，这样导致解释的不是telling lies
    I essentiallyabsolutely agree 第一段也是agree  第二段也是 同意的还是两个不同的观点with the speaker because successsucceed leaders do no？withhold all information which is no good 好像没错 但就是瞅着别扭for themselves or theirgovernment. If a government hides less information,the public thinks itis more demorcratic and will doubt less thus the government is moretrustworthy, really？貌似很多国家天天新闻播出很多事例，但播放的的都是能告诉你的 不能告诉你的都被和谐了，民众无法知道自己所获得的信息是否是一小部分，这样国家掌握信息也没觉得民主啊even the information is about financial problems, forestfires more related to social stability ,or epidemic and crime morerelated to individuals.What is more,没有递进关系 为什么用What is morealthough that the public knowingmuch information which is not good may make political leaders suffercriticism, and various complains and opinions will come outemerge in thesociety,it will also encourages leaders to think out thethe去掉 ways to solveproblems to keep their prestige as well as different ideas willaccelerate solving problems to make the society in order.People shouldhave right to know the truth because they play main roles用单数更好 insociety,political leaders need them when meeting problems while notdealing with them alone 修饰什么成分？.it is a right for them to know whatdifficulties the nation meets and also 有问题an obligation to find ways tosolve them.
    On the contrary,和什么相反？前文没有supreme的成分No autocratic leaders succeed in propagatingsupreme because even they can force the public to conform theirgovenments ,the discrepancy and resistance creates （vt。）n the public.Theresult is always that these leaders all fall off from  the top power.Desirable leaders never do such fool things.They know how to keep thesociety in harmony and make a good relationship to the public整个这一段有凑字数的嫌疑 首先autocracy出现的太过突然，于前文已没有对比，后面又提到了desirable （They know how to keep thesociety in harmony and make a good relationship to the public）这句话对于逻辑没有任何意义的帮助 可以从很多方面理解，建议这段重新修缮一下
    In sum,Though in some special periods and situations,politicals needneed在肯定句中不能用作情态动词withhold some information.The public prefer to see the government withits leaders hide less information  andn trust people more because  itis a good reflection of a democratic society.
本文将两个观点都支持了一番，但是逻辑很乱，不太能归纳出作者的观点，最开始是支持作者的观点，最后又变成支持相反的意见，用词语法错误较多，本作先给3分吧

ps：关于我的作文第一句Political leaders are those guys people vote to for the sake of theability and possibility（ they have ）to promote the development of thesociety   they have是修饰前面的ability 和possibility  to后面的作目的状语
另 bring to sb sth  是bring sth to sb 的倒装结构

juventuslandUID：2631955

多谢老大修改啊。。没想到语法方面用词方面的错误这么多，以后好好增补这方面知识。。。。我估摸着就是3分作文，在论证方法上还有什么改进的地方呢？

Virtual_ProUID：2560768

17# juventusland

既然之前那一篇没改完，那就改你这一篇吧。主要改了句子方面的内容，结构还可以，就不改了。
The author claims that as desirable(题目中原文desirable是用来形容后面的句子的，这里换作形容领导人，是否恰当？）  political leaders,they never tell all information to the public.I essentially agree with it.
    There are no（过于绝对化？） political leaders who are so honest that they never tell lies(tell lies 不等于 withhold information吧？）.They succeed in the competition for the position(争权夺利的中译英是否恰当？） by satisfying most citizens’ want（need） both with(with both) physical and moral  support.They know how to concede(承认的意思？conceal?） some information and tell white lies to gain more votes before they become leaders.When they should bear responsibilities as political leaders（什么情况，前后都是句号？）.Keeping the public from knowing(know不能+ing吧，是否应该改成being aware of） some information which(指代不明） is for the purpose of making the society stable becomes necessary by all apearences（？）.Sometimes  they can prevent panic from spreading  uncontrollably by withhold information via telling white lies.If they tell everything they know,the information may be contorted by some media or some groups of conspirations to mislead citizens. For example,the H1N1  influenza epidemic spreads over the world.The government should  not exaggerate its threatening(minacity) which  may roll（貌似不恰当） the society,what is worse,for instance,what（结构上很乱） will happen if everyone knows the government will lead a stealth to destroy a terrorist base or assassinate someone?
    I essentially(注意，essentially作为副词是实质上，本来的意思） agree with the speaker because success(successful) leaders do no withhold all information which is no good(用词太基础） for themselves or their government. If a government hides less information,the public thinks it is more demorcratic and will doubt less thus the government is more trustworthy, even the information is about financial problems, forest fires more related to social stability ,or epidemic and crime more related to individuals.What is more, although that the public knowing much information which is not good may make political leaders suffer criticism, and various complains and opinions will come out in（out of?） the society,it will also encourages leaders to think out(“想出”的直译，还是“仔细考虑”的意思？） the ways to solve problems to keep their prestige as well as different ideas will accelerate solving problems to make the society in order（感觉上不恰当）.People should have right to know truth because they play main roles in society,political leaders need them when meeting problems while not dealing with them alone.it is a right for them to know what difficulties the nation meets and also an obligation to find ways to solve them（与前面在句子结构上衔接不恰当，also是形容什么的？）.
    On the contrary,No autocratic leaders succeed in propagating supreme because even they can force the public to conform their govenments ,the discrepancy and resistance creates（注意create的用法，是不能当不及物动词用的） in the public.The result is always that these leaders all fall off from  the top power. Desirable leaders never do such fool things.They know how to keep the society in harmony and make a good relationship to(with) the public
    In sum,Though in some special period and situations,politicals need withhold some information.The public prefer to see the government with its leaders hide less information  andn trust people more because  it is a good reflection of a democratic society.

juventuslandUID：2631955

刚刚自己终于认真的把第二次作业写好了。。结果发现老大已经把我的初成稿改好了啊。。。。好感动，大家都好勤劳。
"It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders（政治领袖） to withhold information from the public."

    The author claims that as desirable political leaders,they never tell all information to the public.I essentially agree with it.
    There are no political leaders who are so honest that they never tell lies.They succeed in the competition for the position by satisfying most citizens’ want both with physical and moral  support.They know how to concede some information and tell white lies to gain more votes before they become leaders.When they should bear responsibilities as political leaders.Keeping the public from knowing some information which is for the purpose of making the society stable becomes necessary by all apearences.Sometimes  they can prevent panic from spreading  uncontrollably by withhold information via telling white lies.If they tell everything they know,the information may be contorted by some media or some groups of conspirations to mislead citizens. For example,the H1N1  influenza epidemic spreads over the world.The government should  not exaggerate its threatening which  may roll the society,what is worse,for instance,what will happen if everyone knows the government will lead a stealth to destroy a terrorist base or assassinate someone?
    I essentially agree with the speaker because success leaders do no withhold all information which is no good for themselves or their government. If a government hides less information,the public thinks it is more demorcratic and will doubt less thus the government is more trustworthy, even the information is about financial problems, forest fires more related to social stability ,or epidemic and crime more related to individuals.What is more, although that the public knowing much information which is not good may make political leaders suffer criticism, and various complains and opinions will come out in the society,it will also encourages leaders to think out the ways to solve problems to keep their prestige as well as different ideas will accelerate solving problems to make the society in order.People should have right to know truth because they play main roles in society,political leaders need them when meeting problems while not dealing with them alone.it is a right for them to know what difficulties the nation meets and also an obligation to find ways to solve them.
    On the contrary,No autocratic leaders succeed in propagating supreme because even they can force the public to conform their govenments ,the discrepancy and resistance creates in the public.The result is always that these leaders all fall off from  the top power. Desirable leaders never do such fool things.They know how to keep the society in harmony and make a good relationship to the public
    In sum,Though in some special period and situations,politicals need withhold some information.The public prefer to see the government with its leaders hide less information  andn trust people more because  it is a good reflection of a democratic society.

Virtual_ProUID：2560768

The author claims that as desirable(题目中原文desirable是用来形容后面的句子的，这里换作形容领导人，是否恰当？） political leaders,they never tell all information to the public.But I think the conclusion needs more reasonable analysis.
    Political leaders often keep the public from knowing some information for the purpose of keeping the society stable.Sometimes what they do can pretend(假装？or prevent?) panic from spreading  uncontrollable(uncontrollably).We also can say they tell white lies what can keep people away from depression and stress to the public.（感觉这个从句很别扭,what 和 to the public是否用的不恰当？）If they tell everything they know,the information may be contorted by some media or some groups of conspirations to mislead citizens.For example,the H1N1  influenza epidemic spreads over the world.The government should tell the truth so that can improve people’s awareness of defending the flu（注意defend作为及物动词的用法，可以defend your country，不可以defend your enimy）,and do not exaggerate its threatening(minacity) which will make the society in a panic.(这里感觉很奇怪，前面论述的是不能够告诉公众全部的信息，但是这里却举例说明应该告诉公众一些信息。感觉论据不是用来支撑论点的。）
    However, sometimes leaders hold much information while it（不能用it指代前面的句子，如果是指代information，也不恰当） contributes to（有助于？） people’s hostility and social turbulence. If a government hide less information,the public thinks the government is more demorcratic.People will doubt less thus the government is more trustworthy,even that  is about financial problems, forest fires more related to social stability,or epidemic more  related to individuals.What is more, though if the public know more information,political leaders may suffer criticism, and various sounds and opinions will come out in the society.criticism will also encourages leaders to think out the ways to solve problems.And different ideas will also accelerate solving problems,therefore makes the society in harmony.People should have right to know truth,they play main role in society,when meeting problems,it is a right for them to know and also an obligation.
    No leaders succeed in propagating supreme because even they can force the public to conform their govenments ,the discrepancy and resistence confrontery creates in the public.The result is always that these leaders all from power.So desirable leaders will not do such fool things.They know how to keep the society in harmony and make a good relationship to the public.
    In sum,Though in some special period,political may withhold some information.The public prefer see the government with its leaders hide less information because  it is a good reflection of a democratic society and  a harmonious society.

juventuslandUID：2631955

终于考完了。。。虽然几天后又下一门。。。然后2天后又下一门。。。不过总归好点了。。。。先去背单词看难句。。。背范文明天。。。第二次作业写的很烂，自己修改。。明天。。。明天。。再写3提纲吧。。。考试实在是很繁重。。。不舍得绩点的说

juventuslandUID：2631955

今日日志大头条。。。
俺电脑进水硬盘坏了。。估计明天才能人来修好。。。换硬盘重装系统。。。真是个悲剧。。我亲爱的数据啊。。。今明两天只能借同学电脑上网了。。。不能很多时间。。干脆好好准备后天的考试了，。。。

juventuslandUID：2631955

11点断网。。所以把作业先发上，没来得及怎么修改。我已经发现我写政治类的提纲和文章时都有言之无物的问题。。。需要以后练。。。还是那句话。。。虽然我的基础在小组中算差，但慢慢赶，我相信我能

juventuslandUID：2631955

The author claims that as desirable political leaders,they never tell all information to the public.But I think the conclusion need more reasonable analysis.
    Political leaders often keep the public from knowing some information for the purpose of keeping the society stable.Sometimes what they do can pretend panic from spreading  uncontrollable.We also can say they tell white lies what can keep people away from depression and stress to the public.If they tell everything they know,the information may be contorted by some media or some groups of conspirations to mislead citizens.For example,the H1N1  influenza epidemic spreads over the world.The government should tell the truth so that can improve people’s awareness of defending the flu,and not exaggerate its threatening which will make the society in a panic.
    However, sometimes leaders hold much information while it contributes to people’s hostility and social turbulence. If a government hide less information,the public thinks the government is more demorcratic.People will doubt less thus the government is more trustworthy,even that  is about financial problems, forest fires more related to social stability,or epidemic more  related to individuals.What is more, though if the public know more information,political leaders may suffer criticism, and various sounds and opinions will come out in the society.criticism will also encourages leaders to think out the ways to solve problems.And different ideas will also accelerate solving problems,therefore makes the society in harmony.People should have right to know truth,they play main role in society,when meeting problems,it is a right for them to know and also an obligation.
    No leaders succeed in propagating supreme because even they can force the public to conform their govenments ,the discrepancy and resistence confrontery creates in the public.The result is always that these leaders all from power.So desirable leaders will not do such fool things.They know how to keep the society in harmony and make a good relationship to the public.
    In sum,Though in some special period,political may withhold some information.The public prefer see the government with its leaders hide less information because  it is a good reflection of a democratic society and  a harmonious society.