冬涧苦雪的作业贴——Issue习作

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

8.7 习作
Issue49

Does opponents' idea deter one's progress? Does supporters' idea help one's advancement? Though it is possible, never comes it for sure.

Initially, we should admit that there is such a possibility that the same ideas and positive critics can help progress, while different opinions inhabit from advancing. This phenomenon comes from humans' nature that approaching to the advantage and avoiding from the disadvantage. That is to say, when a person gets appreatiation towards their struggle from others, they tend to fell satisfied and desire to go on and obtain more agreements. And at the same time, their confidence and interest on this field which he or she is working on will be escalated. Then getting progress is a normal thing. On the other hand, when harsh and severe reactions flush into one's mind, there is a very strong psychological reflection that he has no gift on this area or get more and more confused on teh way to progress. Thus, it do make sense to construct a positive relationship between others' opinions and the condition of one's progress.

However, even though the assertion appears to happen in the reality, it is never certain to say that opponent's ideas can prevent one from progressing.

For one thing, what the press from disagreement will affect has something to do with one's attitude towards them. To the optimists, stress may represent motivation. With the failure, stronger determination, courage, and new ideas about how to promote will come together. But to the pessimists,  counterviews are direct cause of suspicion, disappointments and even stop. Actually, it's the pessimistic attitude and vulnerable self that beat them, rather than others' ideas.

For another thing, what cannot be omitted is the active effect to progress. Just like one important principle in Maxims’ philosophy, a contradiction is the source of progress. People get larger opportunity to do better after considering various opinions including mass negative voices. After all, in the procedure of wording hard, one apt to be more and more confident in the pattern of him, ignoring a lot of normal and even obvious mistakes. Only with the help of others' critics, can one get clear with the fault. One practical experience of my friend, Lisa just demonstrates the point. Based on exceptional rich experience on making magazines, Lisa gets a internship chance as iebook editor in a famous magazine company. When she shows the first sample edition to her friend, surprisingly, handful of defects came except for the merits. After negotiating with her friend and correcting it carefully, the edition was passed smoothly. Just think about it, where is the success of the first sample without the opponents' suggestions? So, even good advices are harsh to the ear, progress often come after them.

Eventually, there is one significant point. Even though different ideas prevent one from advancing, it doesn't mean people will advance in agreements. In the fact, progression has matter with many elements beyond others' idea, such as gift, psychological quality, and degree of struggling, working conditions. With the synthesis function with all the factors can help one to advance.

Thus, for improving, one should set up a strong inner spirit, rather than dependent on others' views. The ability of analysis  and insistent is really crucial to get substantial progress.

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

8月8日
issue习作28 国家实力

When we tend to measure the strength of a country with some single indicator, this idea falls in the mistake of overly simplifying a complex issue. Actually, there appears a difference in weighing a national power from different ages. And there hasn't been a surest indicator referred in the issue speaker to represent a great state, neither the elites’ contributions nor people's welfare.

In the antique times, state leaders' occupy of lands, commanders' triumph in battlefields, and contributions from artists and scholars, all the individuals' feat, may be significant to represent a powerful state. Just imagine that, why we will only think of the great men like Socrates, Plato, Aristotle when it comes to the ancient Greek? Why we will mention the Alexander the Great when referring the ancient Rome? Also, Qin ShiHuang, Tang Taizong will come to our minds when dating to the Ancient China. Nevertheless, few will relate the state strength and the welfare of the people living in those ages. It's clear to assume, even if not the surest indicator, the great men's contribution is a better indicator than society's welfare to stand for a country's power.

When it comes to the present times, even though general welfare of people become more and more important, it's far from existing as the surest indicator to weigh a nation's power. Since the democracy started to occupy nearly each contemporary nation, mass' opinions has been a strong element to determine the leaders’ standing. As a result, welfare, the determination factor to people's satisfying degree to a governments has been a strong issue in contemporary society to compare with each other. However, can we assume that welfare can stand for national power the best? That means that a country can be either stronger or weaker depending on the level of welfare. The likelihood is the opposite one from observation of the present economic situation in the Europe. Faced with sluggish economy, the high-level welfare lead the Greek into intense budget deficit and moribund economy, whereas the Germany remain well because of moderate declination in welfare years ago intendedly. So it seems too arbitrary to view welfare as the most certain signal to represent state's power.

However, what on earth is the so-called indicator? Is there an accurate index number to refer? None. Not the GDP, not the CNP, but a comprehensible consideration from the healthy economic, transparent government, stable society, society's welfare, freedom culture which pursues the truth, to the friendly relationship with foreign countries. It is all these factors word together but not any single one that constitutes a substantial powerful country.

Therefore, just like we can’t weigh a problem with only one aspect, never can we only owe the national power on a single element, welfare, or individual's contribution. Only considering the synthesis factors, can we get an object and real result.

清心_巧UID：3199712

我俩互批~把昨天的也一起互批了吧^^

loveJenny0717UID：3240059

还有我的~8.7号的没人帮我批，麻烦你们帮我改一下可以不？我8.8没来得及写……:hug:还有你们的邮箱方便告诉我么？可以直接把改好的文章发给你们~

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

loveJenny0717 发表于 2012-8-8 23:53
还有我的~8.7号的没人帮我批，麻烦你们帮我改一下可以不？我8.8没来得及写……还有你们的邮箱方便告诉 ...

theopenwindow@163.com

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

清心_巧 发表于 2012-8-8 22:45
我俩互批~把昨天的也一起互批了吧^^

:handshake

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

8.9眼前利益与长久考虑

观点：未来和眼前要兼顾
（+）眼前问题具有紧迫性，要给以足够关注。
（-）考虑未来的问题相当于做各方面的战略计划，十分重要。使资源有效利用安排。发展方向明确。民众可以对政府有效监督，提高凝聚力。
（-）没有这种战略计划，现在的问题也解决不好。同时，很多未来问题很快会变成当前的棘手问题。比如资源和环境。

It is reasonable to focus on solving the immediate problems of today, but abandoning solving the future problems is far from wise. That is, we never doubt the rightness to view the current affairs important, but we doubt whether the immediate problems can be solved without considering anticipated issue. And we are also suspicious such a choice in the issue is serious to the mass in a country.

First of all, we have to admit that taking the immediate problems is crucial. Nowadays, all sorts of catastrophes, including earthquakes, floods, volcanoes, and Haiphong, are happening nearly everyday around the world. For every government, without taking these emergencies serious or taking related policies to solve them, the survival of the government is a problem, let alone the development. Take the current Europe as another example. Because almost all the countries there are surviving in the economic recession, their central policies are surely about recovering nation's economic situation and strengthen mass' confidence. That is to say, based on the urgency of current affairs, it's necessary and beneficial to focus on the problems of today.

However, we cannot separate the current affairs and the future consideration apart, viewing them as incompatible staffs. Quite the opposite, solving the anticipated problems of future is not only important, but also shares a close relationship with today problems' solving.

On the one hand, tackling with the future problems is significant. Tackling with the future problem means to make future strategies and plan in all fields, including economic, military, culture, resources, and diplomacy. For one thing, such a strategy can set a clear goal for all the members of the government. In that way, the officers get an idea about what to do, and where to go. All the energies and resources can be allocated reasonably. For another thing, knowing the government's future plan, the mass are acquired of what the government will do, and what can be taken to them, benefit or loss. Even, the people could supervise the government's manners and offer comments effectively. Therefore, the government's efficacy and causative power will be lifted, as a result of future plans.

On the other hand, ignoring the future problems, the immediate problems cannot be settled well because things are connected in the world. For example, put the future environments problems aside, Dalian government agreed the set up of Fujia chemical company, which will release much toxic gas. Yet, because the Dalian habitants paraded to reject it, the company had to be moved. Much extra fund has to be devoted. So, as you can see it, issues of today have something to do with the future problems.
Besides, some future problems, without enough attention, will become immediate problems. If the government don't consider protecting the environment for future, the mass' living quality and the reputation of the country or city will be decreased generally. Then the government will have to devote much more fund on the environment recovering. For another problem, energy crisis has been a huge issue for many countries now, because few have attended the energy limit and new energy development.

Now, we know that government should focus on solving both the immediate problems of today and the anticipated problems of the future. After all, the two elements are related with each other closely.

清心_巧UID：3199712

个人的拙见..嘻嘻

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

清心_巧 发表于 2012-8-9 13:30
个人的拙见..嘻嘻

O(∩_∩)O太感谢了，我会认真改的！加油

死胖子求上进UID：3263681

批改已发送邮件~

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

死胖子求上进 发表于 2012-8-9 23:31
批改已发送邮件~

:victory:thank you~

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

tsaoyu991UID：3207249

批改占座

问号200080UID：3358179

抱歉晚了:$

冬涧苦雪UID：3277513

问号200080 发表于 2012-8-11 01:47
抱歉晚了

问号，谢谢你，你指出的问题真的很关键，很多都是论证分析上面的！
有个问题想交流下，因为我的论点不是着眼将来优于解决当下问题，所以第二部分的论述就没有和现在做对比，着重说解决未来问题的重要性了
你指出的例子和分析连接不好，我会好好改正的，很受用噢，加油！！！