进军美利坚8.26作文

Amber0926UID: 2555355

网速很头疼，半夜才传上来。。。
In the lecture, the professor disagree with the opinion that made in passage. He believes that the theory of giant-impact is quite reasonable.

First of all, the reading passage casts doubt on that the earth lost so big piece of its mantle would causing a huge hole on the earth. However, the professor maintains that the rock plants have been collision each other millions of years,so the trace of impact hardly found on the surface of the earth and many plantes' map have been changed, causing the impact merk have been disappeared. So the professor contradicts what the passage indicates.

Moreover, the passage points out that the moon and the earth are different in composition,such as water percent.
In contrast, professor states the fact that the moon collapse from the space rock, so the heat made it molten and the temperature of the moon is so high, so the water may be evaporate from the moon. This is another part the lecture denies.

Finally, the professor refutes the passage by stating that in fact, the density of the earth' surface is lower than that of the earth's core. while moon is part of the earth's surface, so the density of the moon similar to that of the earth's surface. That's why the density of the moon is lower than that of the earth. So the lecture totally disagree with the viewpoints
made in the reading.

ly8768UID: 2452066

In the lecture, the professor disagree(s) with the opinion that made in passage. He believes that the theory of giant-impact is quite reasonable.

First of all, the reading passage casts doubt on (the fact)that the earth lost so big piece of its mantle would causing a huge hole on the earth. However, the professor maintains that the rock plants have been collision(这个改为：rock plants collided other other billion years ago) each other millions of years, so the trace of impact (is，没be动词了)hardly found on the surface of the earth and many plantes'(planets’) map have been changed, causing the impact merk(mark) have been disappeared. So the professor contradicts what the passage indicates.

有些句型用的比较奇怪

Moreover, the passage points out that the moon and the earth are different in composition, such as water percent. In contrast, professor states the fact that the moon collapse from the space rock, so the heat made it molten(应该是evaporated) and the temperature of the moon is so high, so the water may be evaporate from the moon. This is another part the lecture denies.

Finally, the professor refutes the passage by stating that in fact, the density of the earth' surface is lower than that of the earth's core. While moon is part of the earth's surface, so the density of the moon similar to that of the earth's surface. That's why the density of the moon is lower than that of the earth. So the lecture totally disagrees with the viewpoints made in the reading.

注意下句子的语法问题