8.28日 Narashy 作文

NarashyUID: 2602795

Integrated：

The reading passage talks about the reasons of explosion in Tunguska and points out that it could not been the asteroid. While in the lecture, the professor shows a different opinion for the following reasons.

First, she casts doubt on the evidence of lacking trace, where she says it has been so long before people begin to explore the place and the fragment of the asteroid probably has been destroyed by nature force. The Canadian Explosition in the reading is not convincing in that experts rush to the place in less than 2 weeks which is not comparative to Tunguska's case.

Secondly, she also points out that lacking of crater does not mean there has been no asteroid, which directly contradicts the reading passage. She holds the view that the asteroid could have been exploded in the low atmosphere resulting no significant crater on the surface of earth.

Finally, the professor cast the doubt using the fact that the explosion could not have been concentrated in one point if it was caused by gas. The existance of such place directly contradicts the gas hypothesis.

In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contradicts the reading demonstrates that the reason of gas is in doubt.

NarashyUID: 2602795

Independent:

People seldom reach an agreement on even trivial cases such as whether children should do exercises regularly. When they face this dilemma, some people hold the view that doing exercise regularly is good for children's health condition and can bring children more fun. While other people believe that exercising regularly may cause the children lose their interest in such activity and may even hurt them by accident. With all aspects carefully considered, I'd rather agree with the former.

Exercising does a great job in everyone's daily life. It's is widely accepted that doing sports regularly can improve our health condition, better prepare us for further physical challenge and prevent us from the disturbing of all kinds of diseases. Although sometimes we see that people may get hurt on in exercising and even severe injury, this is the minor phenomenon. By carelly prepaired and obeying the rules, we can definitely avoid these tragedies. Some attention should also be paid to the frequency of the exercise in order to keep the children enthusiastic all the time. As you know, interest is the best teacher to learn.

More importantly, doing exercise is not only a method to keep physical healthy, but also a mean you can have your emotion relaxed. I still remember the days that we were prepairing for the Enterance Exam of High School. With great stress, we kept doing lots of work everyday. However, what we persist more is the Exercise Moment everyday afternoon. Boys rushed into the football game while girls did joging or played table tennis. Smiles appealed on everyone's face and we all felt that the fatigue, tired are all gone and more energetic to do our work.  I can hardly imagine how stressed we would become without these relaxation.

In a word, regular exercise is definitely indispensible for kids, especially who are in the stage our growing and experiece pressure in study. Doing exercise is absolutely a good way to promote health and relax.

liunian1031UID: 2670872

The reading passage talks about the reasons of explosion in Tunguska and points out that it could not been the asteroid. While in the lecture, the professor shows a different opinion for the following reasons.


$ L) C5 X2 n7 D% k
First, she casts doubt on (好词~~~学习了~) the evidence of lacking trace, where she says it has been so long before people begin to explore the place and the fragment of the asteroid probably has been destroyed by nature force. The Canadian Explosition in the reading is not convincing in that experts rush to the place in less than 2 weeks which is not comparative to Tunguska's case.2 \, Y, r. J" X* @0 T
3 S5 k4 _! q) x4 W- C: Q. Y

Secondly, she also points out that lacking of crater does not mean there has been no asteroid, which directly contradicts the reading passage. She holds the view that the asteroid could have been exploded in the low atmosphere resulting no significant crater on the surface of earth.（这一段的听力有些没听懂，后面的low atmosphere是这个道理么？貌似还有俩句其他的话~）

Finally, the professor cast the doubt using the fact that the explosion could not have been concentrated in one point if it was caused by gas（这句话听得很全~）. The existance of such place directly contradicts the gas hypothesis.（但是第三段也貌似没有全听懂吧~~还提到了tree什么的~可以多说一下）


s9 O4 v: G# \4 k5 B
In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contradicts the reading demonstrates that the reason of gas is in doubt.





呵呵，语法我不会，所以挑不出错误~~只能看内容~~
总体没大毛病，就是感觉和我一样越写越少……应该是也有些部分没听懂吧~~

qz163zUID: 2599115

The reading passage talks about the reasons of explosion in Tunguska and points out that it could not been the asteroid. While in the lecture, the professor shows a different opinion for the following reasons.(我个人认为把教授观点写出来会好一点，更清晰明了)

First, she casts doubt on the evidence of lacking trace, where she says it has been so long before people begin to explore the place and the fragment of the asteroid probably has been destroyed by nature force. The Canadian Explosition in the reading is not convincing in that experts rush to the place in less than 2 weeks, which is not comparative to Tunguska's case.

Secondly, she also points out that lacking of crater does not mean there has been no asteroid, which directly contradicts the reading passage. She holds the view that the asteroid could have been exploded in the low atmosphere resulting no significant crater on the surface of earth.（很好很强大）


Finally, the professor cast the doubt using the fact that the explosion could not have been concentrated in one point if it was caused by gas. The existance of such place directly contradicts the gas hypothesis.（还是没点清楚，至少树木引起爆炸的那个例子要说说）

In conclusion, the point made in the lecture contradicts the reading demonstrates that the reason of gas is in doubt

总觉得你写的没把教授说的东西说清楚，都只点了个大概，例子最好越清楚越好
不过实力很强大，鉴定完毕！！！