寄托天下
查看: 1259|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[活动] 进军美利坚作文9月10日-课税作业 [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
76
注册时间
2009-8-19
精华
0
帖子
10
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-9-10 22:22:19 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
do drivers have to pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when traffic is in a great amount.


Along with the fast development of automobile industry, there comes  traffic problems. Nowadays, most of the cities are confronted with the traffic problem to some degree. In most of the big cities, driving in busy city streets in the rush hour is undoubtedly a nightmare. Time consumed on the road is not only a waste to drivers and passengers but also to the efficiency of road-use as well. A number of methods have been taken into practice in order to tackle the almost universal traffic problems, such as allowing only half of private cars onto the road every other day or building more highways or roads to release the pressure of busy city streets. Yet charging drivers who drive in busy city streets when traffic is heavy does not sound to be an efficient solution to traffic problems.

Admittedly, the new policy of paying extra fee for driving in busy city streets during certain time will decrease the amount of cars on these roads to some extent, which might further help release the traffic jam problem or reduce the possibility of car accidents. But the fact is that living in a world which moves as fast as this, most people, including me, might attribute more value on time rather a small amount of money if it could buy you an hour or more. Compared with the precious time, the effect of extra fee seems to be too weak a solvency. Therefore, I believe if drivers and passengers are aware that those charging streets might have less cars, save more time and provide you with a fluent ride, they may probably choose to go onto these special roads instead of moving around.

Even if the fee-paying policy worked in the end, new problems would be created. Suppose the extra fees have had a deterring effect and moved part of the automobiles away from busy city streets in traffic-heavy time, where should all those disappeared cars be? Of course on other roads which could take them to the same destination nonetheless. Then, can these cars be effectively split onto different roads? Is it not possible that frightened cars may rush onto their “second-best choice” thus creates more than one new “busy city streets”? In this case, traffic problems would be worsened instead of solved.

Coming to the details of the method, the feasibility of the charging policy is also questionable. According to what criteria shall the drivers pay their “busy-hour-driving fee?” Since all public roads constructions are built with the money generated from tax-payers----drivers and passengers on the road, is it fair to charge them extra fees on the streets which are directly built by them in the first place? This method might result in complaints among road-users as well.

Everyone wants a better driving condition, less traffic problems and more efficient use of time. The solution of charging drivers extra fee for driving in busy city streets when traffic is in a great amount here is not a good idea given the reasons listed above. Traffic problems, as well as noise, pollution are some of the unavoidable outcomes of the modern society. Handling the traffic problems is no easy job which needs more efforts and consideration.
已有 1 人评分寄托币 声望 收起 理由
小籁 + 5 + 2 加油!

总评分: 寄托币 + 5  声望 + 2   查看全部投币

0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

声望
1977
寄托币
37975
注册时间
2007-8-31
精华
6
帖子
266

荣誉版主 QQ联合登录 IBT Elegance US Advisor US Assistant VISA版特殊贡献

沙发
发表于 2009-9-11 10:33:55 |只看该作者
加油哈
最终究极完全奉献版--无忧签证DIY(流程详解)

美国驻华五大领事馆周边信息汇总快递

美签版发帖提问3部曲:
1  查看精华置顶帖;
2  搜索版内相关帖;
3  发表具体问题贴。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
75
寄托币
1342
注册时间
2008-12-18
精华
0
帖子
15
板凳
发表于 2009-9-11 22:02:58 |只看该作者
Along with the fast development of automobile industry, there comes  traffic problems. Nowadays, most of the cities are confronted with the traffic problem to some degree. In most of the big cities, driving in busy city streets in the rush hour is undoubtedly a nightmare. Time consumed on the road is not only a waste to drivers and passengers but also to the efficiency of road-use as well. A number of methods have been taken into practice in order to tackle the almost universal traffic problems, such as allowing only half of private cars onto the road every other day or building more highways or roads to release the pressure of busy city streets. Yet charging drivers who drive in busy city streets when traffic is heavy does not sound to be an efficient solution to traffic problems. 第一段稍微有点长...! o!。。。 h; i6 t- G4 e  V

Admittedly, the new policy of paying extra fee for driving in busy city streets during certain time will decrease the amount of cars on these roads to some extent, which might further help release the traffic jam problem or reduce the possibility of car accidents. But the fact is that living in a world which moves as fast as this, most people, including me, might attribute more value on time rather a small amount of money if it could buy you an hour or more. Compared with the precious time, the effect of extra fee seems to be too weak a solvency. Therefore, I believe if drivers and passengers are aware that those charging streets might have less cars, save more time and provide you with a fluent ride, they may probably choose to go onto these special roads instead of moving around. 这个思考很深入  不错

^
Even if the fee-paying policy worked in the end, new problems would be created. Suppose the extra fees have had a deterring effect and moved part of the automobiles away from busy city streets in traffic-heavy time, where should all those disappeared cars be? Of course on other roads which could take them to the same destination nonetheless. Then, can these cars be effectively split onto different roads? Is it not possible that frightened cars may rush onto their “second-best choice” thus creates more than one new “busy city streets”? In this case, traffic problems would be worsened instead of solved.



G: S: O
Coming to the details of the method, the feasibility of the charging policy is also questionable. According to what criteria shall the drivers pay their “busy-hour-driving fee?” Since all public roads constructions are built with the money generated from tax-payers----drivers and passengers on the road, is it fair to charge them extra fees on the streets which are directly built by them in the first place? This method might result in complaints among road-users as well.



Everyone wants a better driving condition, less traffic problems and more efficient use of time. The solution of charging drivers extra fee for driving in busy city streets when traffic is in a great amount here is not a good idea given the reasons listed above. Traffic problems, as well as noise, pollution are some of the unavoidable outcomes of the modern society. Handling the traffic problems is no easy job which needs more efforts and consideration.

分析的很好,句子也比较流畅。就是开头结尾稍微可以简洁一些,把中间段落写充实一些。

使用道具 举报

RE: 进军美利坚作文9月10日-课税作业 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
进军美利坚作文9月10日-课税作业
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1005638-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部