【草莓酱拌饭组】作业 第一个A和第一个I,A 17和I 15

ealainUID: 2692003

NO17
.The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Walnut Grove
town newspaper.
"Walnut Grove's town council has advocated switching from EZ Disposal
(which has had the contract for trash collection services in Walnut Grove
for the past ten years) to ABC Waste, because EZ recently raised its
monthly fee from $2,000 to $2,500 a month, whereas ABC's fee is still
$2,000. But the town council is mistaken; we should continue using EZ. EZ
collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects only once. Moreover,
EZ-which, like ABC, currently has a fleet of 20 trucks-has ordered
additional trucks. Finally, EZ provides exceptional service: 80 percent of
respondents to last year's town survey agreed that they were 'satisfied'
with EZ's performance."

正文
Only grounded on a series of uncertain causation and dubious evidence, the author educes a conclusion that Walnut Grove's town should continue using EZ, not ABC. To attest the conclusion, the author points out evidence that EZ collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects only once. In addition the author sets the result of last year's town survey of 80 percent of respondents were 'satisfied' with EZ's performance. Furthermore, the author asserts that EZ -which, like ABC, currently has a fleet of 20 trucks-has ordered additional trucks. However, this alone neither forms a logical argument for the conclusion nor provides cogent help for making the argument tenable. In my view, three logistic problems exist in this argument.

First of all, the author points out that EZ collects trash twice a week, while ABC collects one. ABC's alternative may consider that trash collected one time is enough. The author does not provide enough evidence to prove that there are large numbers of trash have to collect twice a week. On the contrary, this is may be why EZ recently raised its monthly fee from $2,000 to $2,500. In addition, Walnut Grove had the contract for trash collection services for the past ten years, this induce that they do not know ABC. And the author do not supply adequate evidence to support that ABC's collect trash method can not fit Walunt Grove's need. Therefore, just by collect trash times in a week to choose collect trash firm is not wise.

Secondly, the author sets the result of last year's town survey that 80% of respondents felt content with EZ's serves. To this argument, there are several problems. First, the number of person join in the survey is not large. This may not inquiry the persons who are not satisfied with EZ. Second, the people attend the survey is not representational. Because the survey is surveyed last year. May be some people want to change firm this year. Last the people attend the survey does not use ABC's serves at all. The reasons mentioned front, the author does not give enough information to show the Walnut Grove persons' thought. So the survey surveyed last year can not become  causations to choose collect trash firm.

Finally, the author asserts that EZ has order more trucks on the basement of 20 trucks. Although EZ wants to buy trucks, no evidence to say these new trucks which will use to collect trash. Maybe EZ want to exploit new realm. Even these new trucks would use to collect trash, no evidence to prove EZ need more trucks only for Walnut Grove, not other towns. Thus more 20 trucks also can not judge which one to be selected.

ealainUID: 2692003

I 15

Do society steady have a recourse to response of the largely of human behavior? The author claimed so. Deal with the extremes of human behavior well is one reason for the stability of a society, but other reasons (such as economy, history, religion and so on) also very important for the stabilization of a society. So, my view is a good and peace society require many, not only the reaction of  ultra beings action.

Economy grow quickly quite useful for a peace society. Economy is the groundwork of other regions. AS economy move away from the normal track, other domains is cut down, and with it the confidence that food will supply sufficingly, recess will enough,  salary will disburse on time will be no reliable? All these make human feel inquietude. If a person has no money and feels very very hungry, for living he has to steal or heist food. This is economy caused. If economy develop speedily, everyone have a  comfort life, on one would make a joke of his heart's-blood.

History also can influence a society tranquilization. The problems bequeathed by history can  bring war between tow nations. Take South Korea and North Korea for example. In the feudalism period, two nations are unifier. As some changes happened, two countries are not consistent and argue for every aspect. China has a motto "father's debt should reimburse by his son". It means previous generation left knottiness, their sons should pay responsibility for it. These contradictions affect two homes. And this conditions could continue several generations. This instance is not exit between tow homes, but also appear many homes. If we could solve these inconsistencies when it happened, no rancor left, society could quiet and peace.

Religion destroy a society steady. Faith is a holy spirit. From the religion of a country to the belief of a person, they have their gospel. If the difference between two religions, astaticism factor may produce. It can bring brawl even war. Television and broadcast often report news about Israel and Palestine mostly on war. The root of the war is religion. If the faith of two counties is same, they would live peace and happy. I like football, and I am a fan of  Manchester Union. I often tangle with fans of Arsenal. The ability of self-control for me is well, but others may not. So we can see football blackguards fight during every World Cup and Europe Cup.

Incontestable, a society proper respondence to the pesky human action, it also can keep a society steady. If a natural disaster break out one day, but the society don't do effective things to prevent it. It may be bring terrible calamity. Face natural tragedy, only individual power would no effect at all.

Finally, I want to say that we all dream to live and work in peace and contentment. A rapprochement society is needed. In order to come true this dream, only dealed with the extremes of human behavior is not enough, other ingredients (economy, history, religion) also momentous. Therefore a steady-going society demand many aspects. How a society responds to the extremes of being behavior is only one side.

ealainUID: 2692003

写的时候 纠结死了 查了字典
又模仿别人的模板  
总之 第一次作业 感觉自己很失败

阅读方面做的不好
AWintro 才读了一遍  不过体会很多
使得我对AW 的认识 好像和以前不一样  那种感受 好像是 以前都听别人怎么说AW 应该怎么做
自己也那样认为
认真的读了一遍 感觉 虽然别人说的有道理 但好像又不是那样一回事  有自己理解的东西在里面
这周 得继续研究AWintro

debate 看了组长布置的模板  这周 自己没有写 虽然说时间也不多 但是主要原因 感觉自己实力问题

不过我 会继续努力 ！！！
加油！！！ (*^__^*) 嘻嘻……