According to the professor in the lecture that she hold the point that Marco Polo has been to china.
The speaker in the listening argues that name is necesery for a person like Marco Polo.But this point disagrees with statement demonstrated in the reading that the name about China correspond used by Marco Polo samed as Persian historian Rashid al-Din.
According to the lecturer professor siad tea was not popular in that time.Marco Polo is much earlier than that time.The reason which refuses the point that no traveler to China would like to miss the Chinese love of tea in the reading.
In the listening, the professor says that Marco Polo may used a fake name in China rather than his true name for it is much safer. which differs from the reading in that the reading states record of the Chinese and Mongols had no evidence that he served at the court of Mongol ruler.According to the professor in the lecture that she hold the point that Marco Polo has been to china.
第一次写……