- 最后登录
- 2011-11-9
- 在线时间
- 101 小时
- 寄托币
- 190
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-1
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 9
- UID
- 2454121

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 190
- 注册时间
- 2008-2-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
Do you agree with(agree with sth/sb?不能接从句吧!我记得agree on+view,这里你直接agree就可以) that parents are the best teachers? This is an interesting topic(废话,和because的内容没有因果关系) because different people hold different opinion due to their distinct experience and background(我会这样写:for the question, people with diversified background hold different opinion). In my point of view, I think(已经in my view了,不要再用I think) that parents are not definitely the best teachers, now I will present some important and persuasive views to support my statement(这半句太古板了,还不如简单点parents are not definitely the best teachers, for several reasons. 但这样这不大好).
7 ? ~2 |9 y7 `1 k% T
/ ^0 I b, Q* x& K+ }1 `
First of all, one reason can be developed to support my view(GMAT作文这样写还行,toefl里不应该写得这么正式吧,去掉) is that parents always love children very much even their shortcomings(改成love children very much and even ignore their shortcomings?), so they can not directly(easily?) discover children’s bad behavior and guide for(去掉) them. For example, most of parents give all of things children want even if they have no enough money to purchase that. Children do not cherish what they own(have) because they think it is what they should have(gain/take), thus they will form a bad habit. Sometimes when they do not have their best thing(改成achieve their dreams? Or get their favorite gifts), they could shout and scold to their parents, it’s horrible. Therefore, parents are not suitable to be a good teacher for children because they are often partial for their shortcomings(because后的班觉看不懂). (我觉得这例子有点空泛,而且不足以support你的分论点-父母过于喜爱孩子会忽略他们的缺点,从而养成不好的习惯)
. n- Y: w4 D% M' i3 ~. l$ e# j. U
* Z6 |/ K: G! f1 b1 uFurthermore, another reason to support my view is that most of time children stay in school, so parents know about their children a little(less) than teachers. Children accept education in school and they may change everyday in sprit(精神?是mental吧?) and physical body. Teacher is the person they communicate everyday, so teacher may know what they think and what their problems are. Parents are responsible for children’s rest and diet, and they have a few(little?) time to communicate with them, so they could not be mentioned as a good teacher(缺乏case来证明,不可信). # W8 @8 d(2 \ L$ O8 a4 m" w; p, s2 ?. I
# \, b" F8 J- ^6 |
Finally, parents do not learn education or psychology(too absolute!), so they do not know how to teach children very well. Even though they know their children’s character deeply, they have no correct methods to teach them, they could not(动词,be) the best teacher. For instance, they want to(require) children learn history, themselves even do not know exact time of the event or what the important meaning of the event, how can they teach the children very well?(这句建议拆开,现在语法错太多) $ Y$ d q% L* B' L& w0 u
So we can see that parents do not have the quality what a best teacher should have.
, e9 c/ p5 f; V- f5 n
) P5 ]1 Y' G( f! a1 T/ K6 m# UTo sum up, taking into account these factors discussed above, parents are the close people with children, but they could not be best teacher for them.
(我觉得整篇文章是在诡辩,没有比较好的分论点-你的分论点都不能用一句话很简洁的概括;而且证明分论点的方法只有讲道理一种,比较单薄) |
|