1006G敛寒影的备考日记---为理想奋斗是件愉悦的事！

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.20
Comment:

This article introduces a new research on the combination of fiber optics and genetic engineering.

With the optogenetic we can gain control over specific classes of neurons, developing a series of study on the brain's inner working mechanism.The author recommends two aspects in applying this technology.One is to intrigue the neural cell so as to study how neural miswiring underlies neurological and mental disorders,the other is to stimulate certain cells that you want to target in order to switch neurons on or turn them off.Though the description,we know that because of the advantage of the optogenetic that it is light-sensitive and tiny,fired as soon as exposing to light in just a few milliseconds,it is widely used and solving big problems in neurology study.

That is what I learned from the article. The development of science research is at a growing tendency on the molecular level,and the research methods is becoming more precise.I like the last sentence in the article. I’m not writing ethics papers, but I think about these issues every day, what it might mean to gain understanding and control over what is a desire, what is a need, what is hope.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.21 Comment:


This essay introduces EMPs,which can shape and punch holes through industry’s metallic heavyweight—steel and hardened steel, including stainless steel. And, besides punching holes in steel, such a machine could also be used to form shapes out of the metal without the need to use a mould. The shortcoming is although stamping is quicker than Laser,it is material costing.So the EMP should decrease production costs.None but improving its practicality,should the EMP be applied widely in other fields.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.22

The purpose of the example is to show that contradictions, inconsistencies, and paradoxes are perfectly acceptable.

Is it true, as he says, that we are not free to be ourselves because we are constrained by the times and culture we live in?

Although conformity can be interpreted as a loss of freedom, without it society would be reduced to chaos.

However, many times our dissatisfaction with the demands of society is because we have forgotten the benefits of conformity. Whenever we join a group, we share in the benefits, advantages, and power. And conformity is the price we pay to gain admission to that group.

By conforming to mutual expectations, they can transform a living hell to an earthly paradise. Such is the power and freedom we can gain by conforming to the greater good. When we learn to do so because of our concern for the rights of others, we grow in spiritual awareness and help to make the world a better place.

Every man is more than just himself; he also represents the unique, the very special and always significant and remarkable point at which the world's phenomena intersect, only once in this way and never again." So, to relinquish our identity by following the crowd is to deny the world of our potentially unique contribution.

We owe all progress, discoveries, and breakthroughs to those few men and women who had the courage to be different. Their differences made all the difference to the world.

Comment:

The author claim that the contradictions are reconcilable,which recalls me one philosopher’s saying that the two aspects of inconsistency is interacted with each other,accelerating progress.Referring to conformity and individuality,the freedom and restriction is both necessary.

As the author states,we always complain that we are not free to be ourselves because we are constrained by the times and culture we live in, but without conformity,been interpreted as a loss of freedom,society would be reduced to chaos.

In my opinion,freedom is an conception relative to limitation.Without restriction,we have no feelings of freedom,and the truly freedom we should persue(pursue) is rebuilt on the basis of confine of law and formula.

The author points out several pieces of advantage and disadvantage in conformity and individuality.
Conform to mutual expectations, we grow in spiritual awareness and help to make the world a better place.At the same time,we get more pleasure and much more power solving problems.Contrarily,it means relinquish our uniqueness,which we owe all progress, discoveries, and breakthroughs to those few men and women who had the courage to be different. Their differences made all the difference to the world.

We are in such a society that everyone chase for novelty and innovation,and the individual development has been emphasized so high that team cooperation has been neglected.As a result of that,most children lack the character of torlerance(tolerance) and the ability of teamwork,which most of achievement relies on.We should not ignore conformity and meantime,we should enough individual development.Like the author said,dare to be youself,and I would like to add an attributive that under certain rules.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.23
Comment:

The banks got state-backed deposit-guarantee schemes,allowing creditor borrow money cheaply. The assets of America’s banks are now as big as its GDP,taxpayers in most rich countries are underwriting systems several times larger than their economies. Such a levy addresses some of the problems that arise from the blanket guarantee, but in the long run it would be best to withdraw it. All big banks would have an implicit guarantee, but it would not cover their entire balance-sheets.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.24

notorious声名狼藉的

agitate for鼓动

drop out of不参与，退出

subjected to使服从，使遭受

scrutiny详细审查

strikingly醒目地，引人侧目地

vitriolic刻薄的，讽刺的

starts off开始

take stock of估计，观察

plight状态，困境

resounding共鸣的，彻底的，十足的

Men need to be part of that struggle, directing some of their own ambitions in the direction of good parenting, so that the raising of families is accepted as something that demands equal input and that is valued in society, particularly by governments and employers.

Care in the family need not be like that, but valuing everything in monetary terms has diminished humanity, importing elements of the production line to birth, life and death.

Everybody today seems to be in such a terrible rush, anxious for greater developments and greater riches and so on, so that children have very little time for their parents. Parents have very little time for each other, and in the home begins the disruption of peace of the world.

But today it is time to discover their own distinctive futures, an inclusive future for all, not the future of men.

I can think of no better example than...

...what all that entails

Yes, it is entirely possible for a society to make a number of options legally available to all, while these opportunities remain effectively out of reach for many.

It was indeed...

These assessments might seem slight, but...

The traditional role of motherhood, they find, must be slotted within career breaks, then juggled in ever more complex organisational demands of combining salaried work with domestic cares.

The debate, I should add, is not seeking to determine...As has been established, and I would not quibble with any of the evidence on ...But that is not the proposition.

Since that is the proposition I will confine my remarks to debating that point and that point alone.

Comment:

I am firmly captivatd by Mr Donkin's debate starting off with a ateping up and legible position punching into the key problems of this debate.A series of rhetorical questions forcefully claimed that viewing whether women are better off than past is not necessarily about pay and careers but about perceptions, and self-perceptions at that.Avoid talking the ecnomical position of female in society,he cinsidered that the equal educational opportunities and safeguards in the employment system protecting women are evidence to prove that women in the developed world have never had it so good.Mr Donkin spent a mass of words emphasized that happiness and contentment over a lifetime was brought by playing a good role in family concerning on looking after children and eldly.The connotation in Mr Donkin's debate is that combining salaried work with domestic cares,females fulfil an economic role in society while gain enjoyment in family,which means females' self-fulfillment.

Mrs Neill's debate takes Mr Donkin's statement as a target and directly aim at incomplete part of his debate.Taking the example from marriage to reproductive rights,which exhibited women were not being taken seriously in the workplace, in all industries and at all levels.Mrs Neill objects Mr Donkin's claim that this developed society supplies more opportunities for female compareing with past.She rebuts that women's choices are severely constrained in reality,the real reason for women are starting their business is because they hit the glass ceiling at work, not because of some burning desire to be entrepreneurs.

Although there seems exist orthodox conception about raising children as an innate job for female in Mr Donkin's point of view.But it is real that everybody today seems to be in such a terrible rush, anxious for greater developments and greater riches and so on, so that children have very little time for their parents.Of course,it is not relative to mothers,but conscientious to fathers,but women are more careful and circumspective than men do,we calling on these business women spenting more time taking care of children and staying with their family.In Mrs Neill's debate,she indicates that the economical and political position of females should not be ignored,especailly in the example of women's fundamental right to abortion,she concluding that we women want full equality.What an excellent debate it is.I consent with Mr Donkin that the answer depends on the way an individual woman understands her role in society. We can not deny women have been given more choices than ever,but there exist inequity for females' right still,and the women's struggle, the women's movement must carry on.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.26

up in the air悬而未决.

Plausible theories abound. As people grow richer, food becomes relatively cheaper. Time grows more precious: hence the lure of fast food.


Comment:

The irregular pace of life and anomalistic diet custom lead most American people favour quick and convenient food,which is imperfect in nutrition and easily getting fat.Sorts of surveys convey that America's obeisity rate is increasingly growing if they continuously consuming more calories than burning off.The health reforms making the costs of obesity a bit expensive could slow the rate at which they are rising.

Referring to the several methods government taken to rein in calorie in food,they may operate in short term but in the long run.I consent with the author that Eating is social,and your friends' custom influenced you most.People guzzle more if they have overweight friends and relatives, and less if they don't.It is cardinal to prompt awareness of people the balanced diet is necessary for healthy.Picking less calories in supper and less sugary food,and taking exercises more often,that is the golden rule.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.26

up in the air悬而未决.

Plausible theories abound. As people grow richer, food becomes relatively cheaper. Time grows more precious: hence the lure of fast food.


Comment:

The irregular pace of life and anomalistic diet custom lead most American people favour quick and convenient food,which is imperfect in nutrition and easily getting fat.Sorts of surveys convey that America's obeisity rate is increasingly growing if they continuously consuming more calories than burning off.The health reforms making the costs of obesity a bit expensive could slow the rate at which they are rising.

Referring to the several methods government taken to rein in calorie in food,they may operate in short term but in the long run.I consent with the author that Eating is social,and your friends' custom influenced you most.People guzzle more if they have overweight friends and relatives, and less if they don't.It is cardinal to prompt awareness of people the balanced diet is necessary for healthy.Picking less calories in supper and less sugary food,and taking exercises more often,that is the golden rule.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.27

The first technological revolution in modern biology started when James Watson and Francis Crick described the structure of DNA half a century ago. That established the fields of molecular and cell biology, the basis of the biotechnology industry. The sequencing of the human genome nearly a decade ago set off a second revolution which has started to illuminate the origins of diseases. Now the industry is convinced that a third revolution is under way: the convergence of biology and engineering.


The coming convergence of biology and engineering will be led by information technologies, which in medicine means the digitisation of medical records and the establishment of an intelligent network for sharing those records. That essential reform will enable many other big technological changes科学技术进步 to be introduced.


Comment:

The convergence of biology and engineering in medicine means the digitisation of medical records and the establishment of an intelligent network for sharing those records,which supplies such a state convenient communicating between doctors and patients. This new technology brings lots of benefits,not only help doctor grasp patients’ situation more accurately and detailedly,the available information to patients also make them be wary of their own health affairs and empowering them to play a bigger part in managing it. The coming convergence of biology and engineering will be led by information technologies,as long as they will produce better outcomes and offer value for money for insurers and health systems.


In my opinion, the convergence of biology and engineering in medicine could promote big progress with the patients’ database gathering together,convenient to delve ahead,especially the states supplied to communicate accelerating the process doctors solving difficult illness cases.However,we cannot avoid the negative influence that brings to,for instance,the security of patients’ personal information,the big costs in spreading of this technology,the technology of information management.Overall, the convergence of biology and engineering will have a great future,and more positive aspects than disadvantages.

敛寒影UID：2613052

1.28 Yet, as Braque would surely agree, there are certain areas knowledge that only serve to reify our reality, saving us from delving into the fantastic chasm of questions arising from art. This specific area is of course science. One can often become lost in art, in a never ending series of inquiries as to how such a sculpture or painting could be physically possible. Although, science will reassure us as to what is possible and what will remain limited to a picture, or expression of thought or questioning. And last, what the reassurance of science, as well as, the nature of art entail in their representational and informative nature. Dance and the Theater, a place where art has flourished, is an example of how deceit and manipulation have manifested themselves in an art form that is revered, and held to be a distinguishing skill; acting. These are both examples of what art has done to upset the view that one has on the way things work. It may be thought that this form of art would only serve as a method of human expression, and would actually be pure and true in revealing something about human nature, but this is not necessarily the case. The social science of psychology tells us that each individual has a different perception of complex messages, such as those offered by a theatrical performance, only proving that the art has served as a way to upset a person’s interpretation by saying that it is wrong. Thus it is that a problem of knowledge when dealing with the arts is the interpretation of the arts by others. It is difficult to conceive how the various parts can fit together as a real three-dimensional object, and yet it exists in the art of humanity. Some would say that these works of art are explainable through dimensional theory and extensive analysis, but this still does not deny how upsetting the concepts these pictures present. The explanation of arts is what we see as most reassuring, even if it takes a method that is not traditionally associated with the arts. Science is not usually in the forefront of one’s mind when viewing a work of art, yet there is explanation for some of art’s implications through science, and refutation of some of the implications of art, on reality. The triangle exists in the second dimension, but when placed into the third dimension (which is what our brains try to do once it is viewed) simply can not happen when realistically applied. Furthermore, it is more important for your visual system to adhere to these constraints than to violate them because you have encountered something that is paradoxical, unusual, or inconsistent. This kind of reassurance is exactly what Braque is suggesting art cannot definitively support, due to the processes that science endures it is seen as a more legitimate and trustworthy method of assurance. Although art may upset, and science may reassure, this does not necessarily imply that one could do the other and vice versa反之亦然. Though, with art of this nature, one does not have to deal with metaphors暗喻, or abstract concepts, the picture is straight forward, telling what is, not what is subjective.The views on art only further prove its subjectivity, and how it can never be as reassuring as science.There is a wide variety of opinion and lack of continuity regarding artistic concepts, yet science seems to find a way to transcend this subjectivity. Science can reassure because its axioms exist in nature, where art will eternally be left up to individual interpretation. Braque does indeed show us how art can truly be upsetting, while leaving the reassurance to a reliable natural given that we find in science. Comment: Science can explain the fatastic chasm of questions of art,telling us what is possible and what will remain limited to a picture.The author adduce two examples of what art has done to upset the view that one has on the way things work.One is people dances in attempt to cause rain,the other is the ghost of Oedipus come back to haunt his children,both instilling in dividuals a mystical image of what could be. Following,through two instances of impossible triangle impossible staircase,the author substantiate that it is a problem of knowledge when dealing with the arts is the interpretation of the arts by others. In the third part of this essay,the author is to prove the claim that although art may upset, and science may reassure, this does not necessarily imply that one could do the other and vice versa. This is a article converge science and art,the standpoint is easy to understand rather than the whole article.I acquired ample illustration from this article,calrifying the structure of this essay firstly,then comprehending and digesting the content.

敛寒影UID：2613052

要回家了，家里断网。。
在此小别寄托，小别REBORN。。
一个月后回归！
XDJM们加油！我也继续努力！

敛寒影UID：2613052

祝2月上战场的G友们发挥出历史最高水平，
虎年要虎虎生威哦！:victory:

敛寒影UID：2613052

回来了~~
才发现很多大家都已经考完了，怪不得群里静悄悄的~~
开始倒计时20天
给自己加油！