寄托天下
查看: 1484|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[a习作temp] 评作文啦!argument39 让板砖来的更猛烈吧 [复制链接]

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
342
注册时间
2009-1-25
精华
0
帖子
4
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-20 22:11:31 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
39.The following appeared in a memorandum from the president of Humana
College.

"Last year the number of students who enrolled in long-distance degree
programs at Omni University increased by 50%. During the same year, Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for
dormitory and classroom space, most likely because instruction in the
long-distance programs takes place via interactive video computer
connections. In contrast, over the past three years, enrollment at Humana
College has diminished and costs of maintaining buildings have risen.
Thus, to increase enrollment and solve the problem of budget deficits 财政赤字at Humana College, we should initiate and actively promote long-distance degree programs like those at Omni."

去年报名参加Omni大学远程教学系统的学生人数上升了50%。同年,Omni用于宿舍和教室的开支比前一年显著下降,很可能是因为远程教学通过互动电脑录像授课。比较而言,在过去三年中,Humana学院的报名人数下降了,而且用于房屋维护的费用上升。因此,为增加报名数量并解决Humana学院财政赤字问题,我们也应该开展并积极推广与Omni一样的远程教学系统。
原论点:
1 OMNI开支下降是因为远程人数增多(攻击点,A远程人数开始较于正常学生数量就非常少,即使增长50%也不多,B暗含正常学生减少,没来由C与前一年比较下降并不说明少,可能前一年房屋大修开支非常大,而此年开支较之多年平均偏高却低于去年D暗含 宿舍教室开支减少则赤字问题减轻,可能网络布设宣传费用很高)
2HUMANA赤字 的问题可以通过OMINI的方法来解决(攻击点,A 暗含赤字主要源于房屋维修支出增多,不一定 。B 即使A成立, 两者仍不具有可比性,a房屋维修不等同于宿舍教室开支,b远程教育适合omini却不一定适合HUMANA,两学校侧重不同,前者文类后者理工类,前者教学质量好,后者差。C即使B,未必解决赤字问题,赤字问题主要原因可能在其他,分进出来讲,如行政管理失误,过度投资,人员过多,改善教学质量等
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
342
注册时间
2009-1-25
精华
0
帖子
4
沙发
发表于 2009-11-20 22:12:08 |只看该作者

正文 ARGU39 528字

本帖最后由 jessicamarine 于 2009-11-20 22:20 编辑

Providing an imitation solution, the president's suggestion seemed reasonable on the first glance. However, further analysis reveals several logical problems as below.
To begin with, whether Omini's experience should be called as a success is unknown. The great decrease in house expenditure from the prior year does not necessarily mean that the housing cost last year was lower than the average. It is entirely possible that both the two years housing expenditure are higher than the average for some reason. If so, the cost decline make no sense to the author's suggestion. Even if the housing cost this year is lower than average, the president's assumption that the decrease should be attributed to the increase of long-distance students is still open to doubt. Maybe the base number of long-distance students is poorly small compared to the whole number, making the 50% increase make little influence on the students number, let alone cutting down the housing cost.
Even assuming it's the increase of long-distance students that resulted in Omini's housing cost decline, we just cannot accept the optimistic analogy that the program will also help Humana increase its enrollment and solve the budget deficit problems. As we all know, things are different. The long-distance program's success for Omini does not necessarily mean that it's also a good choice for Humana. Maybe, Oimini is a university famous for economics, while Humana is an engineering college. Obviously, few people will choose a long-distance course for engineering. Or maybe, Omini has a good reputation while Humana is not, In any of these cases we see little chance of Humana's success in long-distance degree program. In fact, it is not wise to limit our attention to the long-distance teaching only, instead we should pay more attention to why the enrollment students decreased and what we can do to solve that. For example, better advertising and enrollment policy may contribute to a more significant increase on enrollment. Anyway, without ruling out these possibilities, the president just cannot convince me that Humana will win an increase in enrollment simply with a long-distance degree program.
Moreover, the president unwarrantedly assumes that the decrease in enrollment and increase in maintenance fee should be accused as the main cause for its budget deficit. However, this is not necessarily the case. Other negative factors such as improper policy,, poor investment, imperfect management should also be taken into account. To sum up,  just  imitating the long-distance degree program without a thoroughly analysis and effective measure eradicating the cause for the deficit, we see little chance for truly solving the deficit problem.
In summary, the president's suggestion is unconvincing. To better support it, the president must provide sufficient evidence that students enrolled in long-distance program make up a significant proportion and  the housing cost this year is lower than average due to that. To better evaluate it, we need more information about Humana, what is it like at all and whether it's courses are  fit for a long-distance degree program , etc. We would also need to know how much the enrollment and housing cost problems weighed in the deficit problems. Only in this way can we accept the president's suggestion.

ARGUMENT39.doc

21 KB, 下载次数: 4

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
5
寄托币
342
注册时间
2009-1-25
精华
0
帖子
4
板凳
发表于 2009-11-20 22:15:08 |只看该作者
都想拿板砖拍自己,嗨,还是功底太薄,根本找不到感觉

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
143
注册时间
2009-10-5
精华
0
帖子
0
地板
发表于 2009-11-22 22:11:46 |只看该作者
我再来拍拍~
感觉a写得挺有条理的,各点都说到了。可以再说说,基于interactive video的远程教育项目反而会增加财政负担。
欢迎回拍~
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... 6amp%3Btypeid%3D102

使用道具 举报

RE: 评作文啦!argument39 让板砖来的更猛烈吧 [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
评作文啦!argument39 让板砖来的更猛烈吧
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1031457-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部