- 最后登录
- 2013-4-11
- 在线时间
- 503 小时
- 寄托币
- 1306
- 声望
- 139
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-6
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 22
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1261
- UID
- 2707493

- 声望
- 139
- 寄托币
- 1306
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 22
|
本帖最后由 名字是个词儿 于 2010-1-4 16:12 编辑
TPO9-5
Listen to part of a lecture in a geologyclass.
So, continuing our discussion of desertlakes, now I want to focus on what’s known as the Empty Quarter. The Empty Quarteris a huge area of sand that covers about a quarter of the Aribian[Arabian] Panisular[Peninsula半岛]. Today it’s pretty deserlet[desolate 荒芜的], barren, and extremely hot, but there’ve been times in the past when monthon[monsoon季雨] rains soped[soaked 渗透] the empty quarter, andturned it from a desert into grass land that was dotted with lakes and homed[home to] various of animals(6. 主旨题). There were actually two periods ofrain in lake formation, the first one began about 37000 years ago, and thesecond one dates from about 10000 years ago.
Excuse me, professor, but I’m confused, whywould lakes form in a desert? It’s just sand, after all.
Good question, we know from modern date[day] desert lakes, like Lake Arian[Eyre], south Australia, that under the rightconditions, lakes do form in the desert. But the Empty Quarter lakesdisappeared thousands of years ago, they left behind their bed or basins aslimestone formations that we can still see today. They look like low-line[low-lying], white or grey builts[builds], long narrow hills or flat tops, barely ameter high, a recent study of some ofthe formations presents some new theories about the area’s past. Keep in mind,though, that this study only looked at 19 formations, and about a thousand hadbeen documented, so there’s a lot more work to be done(7. 细节陈述). Accordingto this study, two factors were importantfor lake formation(8. 题干定位) inthe Empty Quarter. First, the rain that fell there were terancial[torrential 奔流的,猛烈的], so it would have been impossible for all the water to soak intothe ground. Second, as you know, sanddunes contain other types of particles 颗粒 besides sand including clay and silt 淤泥.(8. 正确选项改写) Now, when the rain fell,water ran down the sides of the dunes 沙丘, carrying clay and silt particles with it, and wherever theseparticles settled, they formed a pan, a layer that water couldn’t penetrate 渗入. Once this pan formed, further run-off collected and formed a lake.
Now, the older lakes, about half theformations, the ones that started forming 37000 years ago, the limestone 石灰石 formations we see, they’re up to a kilometer long, but only a fewmeters wide, and they’re scattered 分散 along the desert’s floor in valleys between the dunes, so thetheory is the lake’s form there, on the desert floor, in these long narrowvalleies[valleys]. And we know because of whatwe know about similar ancient desert lakes, we know that the lakes didn’t lastvery long, from a few months to a few years on average. As for the more recentlakes, the ones from 10000 years ago, well, they seem to have been smaller, andso may have dried out more quickly. Anotherdifference very important today for distinguishing between older lake beds andnewer ones is the location of the limestone formations(9. 列举). Themore recent beds are high up on the dunes. Why these differences? Well, there’resome ideas about that, and they have to do with the shapes of the sand duneswhen the lakes were formed. 37000 years ago, the dunes were probably nicely roundedat the top, so the water just ran right down their sides to the desert floor.But there were thousands of years of wind between the two rainy periods,reshaping the dunes, so during the second rainy period, the dunes were kind of chopped upat the top, full of hollows 洼地 and reges[ridges], and thesehollows would have captured the rain right there on the top.
Now, in a grass land of lake ecosystem, we’dexpect to find fossils from a variouty[variety]of animals, and nonmoon’s[numerous] fossilshave been found, at least at these particular sites. But where did theseanimals come from? Well, the theory that’s been suggested is that they migratedin form nearby habitats, where they were already living, then as the lakesdryed[dried] up, they died out. The study makesa couple of interesting points about the fossils, which I hope will be lookedat in future studies. At older lakesites, their fossil remains form hypopotemyses[hippopotamuses],water bufflo[buffalo],(9. 列举) animals that spend much oftheir lives standing in water, and also fossils of cattle. However, at the sites of the more recent lakes, there’s only cattlefossils(9. 列举),additional evidence for geologists that these lakes were probably smaller,shallower, because cattle only use waterfor drinking, so they survive on much less(10. 细节。 对比). Interestingly, there are plantments[clams and], nailshells[snailshells], but no fossils of fish, we are not sure why. Maybe there was a problem with the water,may it was too salty(11. 细节。逻辑因果), that’s certainly true with other desert lakes.
8题错,听原文时没有记下clay and silt,也没听出来sand dune,只记下了sand。所以没辨认出正确选项B。并且原文的逻辑关系没记好,所以不清楚选项D是否属于定位处。 |
|