ARGUMENT143 [REBORN FROM THE ASHES] TASK ONE by 中原527

中原527UID: 2707367

很典型的注水肉................
Based on a recent report on the United States economy, the author presented his contradicted opinion that we were misleading by the recent article said that many competent worker who lost
jobs as a result of downsizing face serious economic hardship, usually for years, before finding other suitable employment. But there are some doubtful points in the recent report the author offered.
Above all, it can’t offer the precise statistics about every events such as the increasing number of new jobs and the number of extinction of jobs. There are no evidences to prove that the number of new jobs is more than the extinction of jobs. And the report used the hazy data instead of the exact data the argument should indicate, for instance," many of those who lost their jobs have found new employment", but no one can know the truth about there are how many people who have found out the jobs. The recent report the author relied on was unwarranted without the powerful statistics to support the view of him.

Then the argument above is weakened by the fact that it does not take into account the different groups of workers who may be hided in the statistics. Two-thirds of the newly created jobs that tend to pay above-average wages, which have been offered by industries, did not suit the workers who had lost jobs , but the workers who were seeking for the first chance such as the graduated students. Focusing on this crucial group which have no attention on them in the argument, it is the one of rips in the topic. There are some reasons of the fact that many unemployment had no jobs all the same. Because of the advancement of science and technology, the ability of the unemployment can not meet the requirement of new jobs or the age restriction and so on. So that the jobs might mostly were offered to the next generation of people who need the work, not the old unemployment. Assumed the point that far more jobs have been created than have been eliminated has been proved indeed,
but the author ignored another possibility that the increasing number of the population of which the workers need the jobs might exceed the incremental data of new jobs have been created. If it is real , the number of unemployment is increasing still.
In conclusion, the author couldn’t contradict the truth about downsizing, since this report he depended on can't provide any effective or actual information against the misleading report. The latent danger of downsizing in the United States still exists , so that we should recognize the real fact and take action to increase the employment status.
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=921368&highlight(讲述如何深刻驳倒阿狗，理论虽然如此，还得我们在实践操作中磨练)
感觉比ISSUE13难写多了....不知道为啥....到写的时候深感读过的草木作文贴的重要性....
实在是不知道怎么有更多的话来辨析阿狗....