第二次习作a17 希望G友多指点 共同进步

nvligreUID: 2689384

The editor of the Walnut  Grove town nespaper claims that it may be wrong about selecting ABC Waste .He lists a few advantage for EC Waste to support his viewpoint .It is seem to be reasonable  .however,close scrutiny reveals that the evidences give above provide little credible support for the editor's assertion.
     First,a threshold problem with the editor relys on a unproved premise that the Walnut Grove's town council choosen ABC instead of EC waste just for the price .It is entirelypossiblity that ECwaste is a traditional landfill company and this company still adapt old methods to disposal trash .while ABC Waste is a high technology company .It is not only disposal trash  but aslo detach recyclable goods .therefor it is saved a lot of resources for social .the editor fails to take into above accounts in the letter.
      Next ,the editor makes some comparison betwween EZ and ABC .he claims that EZ collects trash twice a week ,and has a flect  of 20 trucks .The editor may overlook some reasons.firstly,ABC collects only once a week would meet public' need .secondly,the editor only mention EZ' trucks instead of mentioning ABC'.thirdly,it could mot provide the same service as it did several years ago when it charged 2000 dollars per month .EVen if it certain improve its service without meeting to charge more 500 dollars per month .
      Finally.the last year's town survey indicated that 80 percent of repondents were satisfiesd with EZ's performance .Although a 80 percent seems significant,the editor fails to indicate what portion ,the less reliable the results.
      In sum ,the recommendation is not well supported.To bolster it the letter's edtior must provide specific evidence that Walnut Grove would benefit from EZ.To better assess the strengh of the recommaendation Iwould need more information between EZ and ABC about  their disposal method ,management and scope.