61第一次写issue 自己改了下 没方向 求拍 谢谢

lost11UID: 2736683

TOPIC: ISSUE61 - "High-profile awards such as the Nobel Prize are actually damaging to society because they suggest that only a few people deserve such recognition."


Is it true that because only a few people deserve the high-profile awards as Nobel Prize are detrimental society? Although I utterly admit the speaker's argue that it is hard for everyone gain such prize, we should put our eyes on fruit what the laureate contribute to society and their research is much more benefit to improve our life, furthermore the people who concentrate on the high-profile awards should change their attitude to such prizes.

Admittedly, only a few people deserve such recognition and there may many others devote all of their life but obtain nothing. The major important thing we should classify is, due to these awards such as Nobel Prize are on the acme of the mountain that incite lots of scientists, pacifists and a crowd of artists try their best to climb such a high mountain, and work for the well-being of human's development. It is entirely not necessary of Nobel Prize is as prevailing as health-care. We can imagine that if everyone can obtain such prize one time even more, how can it incite every one of us to pursue the goal and pursue the more peaceful, technological and convenient world? On the other hand, though it cannot as prevail as health-care and only a few people deserve such recognition, that it is possible for everyone get benefit from the fruit of the research. Thus although not everyone deserve such prize, every one of us can get profit from the research.

Another point need to be point out is even only a few people deserve such recognition, everyone have equal right to pursue it. Putting our eyes on Hawking a paralyze man and walking by wheelchair, living by a special equipment, writing by his wife. Such a man spend all of his life on his scientific research, during the road to success how many frustration he confronted may only the ordinary life as using own hands to write . He can deserve Nobel Prize, we also have chance to gain it. The only different thing is he devout himself to delve his project but we only stand aside and complaint about why only such a few men obtain it. Hence before claiming that Nobel Prize is actually damaging to society because only a few people deserve it, we had better introspect ourselves whether they really deserve it or not and if we have the same chance to pursue it.

Before I come to my conclusion, it is necessary to point out that the fundamental aim of such awards. The most majority aim of the Nobel Prize is award that people who make effort to leading our social more harmonious, promoting the human being development and protecting our environment and rational utilize them, but not call our attention to their high-profile. A scientist always will spend most of his (her) life and need a lot of found bolstering his (her) research, most of them are really loyalty to their research but rare focus on the requite. Madam Curie is the convincing example, her research made her losing her life at an early age and during her life, her children played with her medal as their droll. We can see what she pursued is not the high -profile of the prize but the research which she pursued all life. Thus we should change our attitude to high-profile awards, it is not only a requisite for one's effort of the research but an incentive mechanism for everyone else to make endeavor for stabilizing our society.

In conclusion, before asserting that only a few people get the high-profile awards are damaging to society, we should ponder if the effect of the research brings more beneficial to social than so called high-profile and if we should change our mind about the aim of the awards. The last but not the least we should introspect ourselves if we have the same chance to get such price then we can do our best to chase it.