The lecture is mainly discussing that why people read less literature today than they used to. Thus, the lecture totally disagrees with what are stated in the passage.
First of all, in contrast to the argument stated in the passage that without literature,people will lose more benefits, the professor says that there are many high-quality books such as science writing, history and political analysis. These books are also good books to stimulate people’s imagination.
Secondly, the lecture contradicts the point made in the passage that reading less literature means the declination of culture. The professor argues that nowadays the culture has been changed. There are so many different forms to express culture other than novels and poems.
Finally, while the passage states that the literatures are lack of audience, the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor says there might be the author’s fault. Today’s literatures which are difficult for readers to understand would lose their readers.
In sum, the contents in the reading passage are totally refuted by the lecture and the lecture advocates totally different ideas on the topics made in the reading passage.
The lecture is mainly discussing that why people read less literature today than they used to. Thus, (是因果吗?)the lecture totally disagrees with what are stated in the passage.
First of all, in contrast to (what)the argument stated in the passage that without literature,people will lose more benefits, the professor says that there are many high-quality books such as science writing, history(historical) and political analysis. These books are also good(总觉得该换高级词。。) books to stimulate people’s imagination.8 o/ f+ S8 ]3 Q. G4 t
Secondly, the lecture contradicts the point made in the passage that reading less literature means the declination of culture. The professor argues that nowadays the culture has been(culture主动) changed. There are so many different forms to express culture other than novels and poems.: c5 K; _* _% A5 k$ R4 m; e7iFinally, while the passage states that the literatures are lack of audience, the lecture maintains a different point of view. The professor says there(this) might be the author’s(authors') fault. Today’s literatures, which are difficult for readers to understand would lose their readers.(people's appetite之类,最好不重复); Y5 a- |) F H; i" A
5 [' S, d' K4 X8 Q
In sum(不确定有没有in sum), the contents in the reading passage are totally refuted by the lecture and the lecture advocates totally different ideas on the topics made in the(of) reading passage.(如果再加上具体写出前三段的总结,我觉得更好一些)