1006G[redemption]备考贴 by lcv8006/小痴

lcv8006UID: 2452096

第五次作业

TOPIC: ISSUE136 - "The absence of choice is a circumstance that is very, very rare."
WORDS: 560
TIME: 00:60:00
DATE: 2010-1-29 21:50:23
提纲：
没有选择和选择一样，都是一种很普通的现象。
分论点1，什么是选择？生活中充满选择（超市例子）
分论点2，现代社会，选择非常重要
分论点3，尽管选择很重要，但没有证据表明没有选择的现象就很稀少（超市例子，）

There is no one deneying the fact that choice is a usual thing in our life, and you may meet many situations
that you have to make your choice.Yet does it mean that the circumstance of absent choice is very rare? I don't think it's a reansonable assignment. As for me, I think the absence of choice is also a normal situation just like the presence of choice.

First of all, we should understand what is choice, why we have to choose, and how to do it. Choice, I maintained, is a special situation that you have to select one or several
things from
a group of them based on your background such as the age, finance, education, or interesting and so on. For example, when we visiting a supermarket, maybe we want to buy some food for our family. But it is unrealiable to take all food in the market to our cart taking into account of the people's number of our family and the money in our wallet. So we must draw the conclusion according to the fact that how much food is enough and which kind of food that my baby would like and other reasons like these . Then, we have completed a choice. Thus, there are various kind of choice in our life, it is a choice that we vote to a candidate for president. and it is also a choice that we choose a perfer cloth in shopping. Making a choice, which has been existed nearly every aspect of our life.

Furthermore, with the rapid progress of science and technology, how to make a correct choice as soon as possible has been an important ability in the modern society, a information exploration society. There are millions of information have been produced every second. We have no time to select as the old methods. And what we can do is just look and choose, as some people has said “ even a wrong answer is better than missing”.

On the other hand, although the presence of choice has been an essential circumstance in human society, there is no evidence confirmed the fact that the absence of choice is very rare. For example, we live in a small town with only one supermarket, then we have no choice to buy something from it. Or we go into a supermarket with one buck for food, we have to take the cheapest food without choosing. Of course, we can make our means to do some to get the select chance. However, there is something that we never can choose. It is undisputable that we can not choose our parents,our families, our nations, and our skins, which have been determined when we were born. At the same time, no one want to select only one things when facing the friendship, kindness, warm-heart, honest…all positive morals of human nature. There must be somethings that we can not make a choice and we would rather have no choice. Thus, the absence of choice would not becoming rare in our life.

In conclusion, choice is becoming more and more vital in our human lives, yet there must have some thing that we can not choose.

娃娃衫公主UID: 2677493

好像我那次应该改丹心的~~不过无所谓，一起进步哈


How to deal with the world’s most persistent social problem? To build up a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving it. At first glance, the issue seems to be appealing, yet is it proper to put such a heavy burden on a group of young men? As for me, a global university, to some extent, would be a good idea to settle some social question by enhancing the communication of young people. But it must be a idealist’s thinking to solve the world’s social problem entirely depending on it. 【论点】

First of all, it is a significant idea to build a global university. No one can deny the fact that there are a great deal of conflicts in the world nowadays coming from misconceived and lack of communication. And I don’t think there are some people want their children to inherit such mistakes. Thus, a global university, many students with various backgrounds, coming from multiplex cultures, and saying a different language lives in which. It would be a momentous chance to build up the friendship among adolescents all over the world. And it would be an available passport to solve some social problems of the world. （两句连为一句，这样你的文章的句式看起来或者能更有变化）

Nevertheless, in view of the persistent social problems, some of them are not formed only by misconstrued（misconstruction）. It would be some history reasons and some beneficial contention, such as the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and Somali pirates. And some of them may be caused by mistake, but it cannot be resolved just by sufficient communication. （这个推论太跳跃了，建议再详细一点）So it is （a）weakness to construct a globe university facing with such questions. 【这段你根本没有证明，problems caused by some history reasons and some beneficial contention就不能通过global university 解决】

Moreover, Every nation has its own circumstance, and few problems allow for any permanent situation. Obviously, the social problems are totally different in different countries, even in different regions in one country. It is hard to define what the major problem in a country is. For some nations, it is indisputable that there are millions of people who still have（lead） a miserable life and have to face the dangers of starvation and explosure. Thus to survive is their most social problem（错句）. However, for some other countries, it is unbelievable to image the lack of food, water and cloth. The people in these countries has often put more energy on other problems, such as how to reduce crime, educate their children and others. Just as an old Chinese idiom saying（goes）: “ each family has its own problem”. Likewise, the biggest problem of the world is to prevent wars in last century, but it is how to substantially develop nowadays. So it is impossible to solve all problems without according to the accurate situation of each country. And there are no such effective methods which have worked in one country must be useful in another country. Even if there is such a global university, how can we be sure that the advice from the student in the university is useful and reasonable
at any situation.
From what have been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion: although there are some benefits to build up a globe university, it is uncertainty to pin all hopes on it.
文章中有语法和词汇的小错误~~
第二段论述不够详细，观点站不住脚
结尾略显单薄，建议你能绕几下在推出观点，这样也能显得考虑更周全

lcv8006UID: 2452096

第六次作业
改娃娃衫公主
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1054088&page=2#pid1773558482

ahmxwdUID: 2390552

112 "Some educational systems emphasize the development of students' capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, but students would benefit more from an education that also taught them to explore their own emotions."


Should we pay more attention to the logical thinking progress, or the exploration of their 【指代错误】own emotions? As far as I am concerned, I think the education to seek after emotions equates with [equate用法错误，be equal to更好]the development of logical thinking ability.

First of all, it is very important to train the students to quest【这是个名词】 for their own emotions. Because if 【去掉】only when they know how to explore their own emotions that they would know how to control their emotions. And no one can deny the fact that it is a momentous component of a successful career or a useful life to dominate his feelings freely. For example, with the rapid progress of science and technology, it is impossible for everyone to live without medicine since they are born. yet do you know each useful components in the medicine is filtered from several millions compounds, with the cost of nearly one billion dollars and almost ten years. We can image that the scientists would meet how many difficulties.【chinglish】 They would be angery[angry], disappointed and discouraged. And they would be deceived by some activity compounds with unhopeful effects, even they have spent several millions dollars on it for several years.[这个猜测缺乏依据，需要进行说明或是论证] So, how to command their emotions and keep a positive feelings to continue their research are indisputable【应该是indispensible吧？】 lessons for【to】 every scientist. And they would benefit a lot from it if they got the education of exploration their own emotions in their campus. 【缺乏依据，建议再对原例子进行深入分析，阐明如何benefit】

Moreover, without the education of 【on】how to search after their emotions, the students wouldn’t extricate themselves from impulsive trip. And it must be noted that a large number of crimes and errors are caused by impulse in our social, especially for young people.

However, although it is necessary to expanse the education of the exploration emotions, which doesn't encounter 【？】the development of reasoning and logical thinking. The ability of reasoning and logical thinking is a basic capacity in students’ future work. For instance, in the science research and company management, it is necessary to attain the nature from phenomena【Chinglish】, and find the mechanism that exists. Just like Mendeleev, a famous chemist in Russia, who had invented Periodic Table of Elements. He forecasted several elements which hadn’t been found at that time by analysized the known elements which have been proved by the later scientists’s discovery. Thus a qualified student would got systematic education of the reasoning and logical thinking.

From what has been discussed above, we can safely【建议删掉】 draw the conclusion: the capability of reasoning and logical thinking are equal with【to】 the training of searching after students’ own feelings. Both of them would be taked into account in the education.


评:
1、在举例方面应该多加注意自己对所举例子的分析，不能脱离例子所要说明的观点
2、有些语句有着明显的中式英语的痕迹，建议多读一些好文章或是好句型进行学习
3、优点是注意到了层次关系，和例子与文章的结合

after17UID: 2681985

TOPIC: ISSUE136 - "The absence of choice is a circumstance that is very, very rare."
WORDS: 560
TIME: 00:60:00
DATE: 2010-1-29 21:50:23
提纲：
没有选择和选择一样，都是一种很普通的现象。
分论点1，什么是选择？生活中充满选择（超市例子）
分论点2，现代社会，选择非常重要
分论点3，尽管选择很重要，但没有证据表明没有选择的现象就很稀少（超市例子，）

There is no one deneying the fact that choice is a usual thing in our life, (有了and是不是逗号可以去掉？)and you may meet many situations
that you have to make your choice.Yet does it mean that the circumstance of absent choice is very rare? I don't think it's a reansonable assignment. As for me, I think the absence of choice is also a normal situation just like the presence of choice.开头点明论点，选择和没选择是一种普遍现象。

First of all, we should understand what is choice, why we have to choose, and how to do it. Choice, I maintained maintain, is a special situation that you have to select one or several
things from
a group of them based on your background such as the age, finance, education, or interesting and so on.分论点一什么是选择，接着举例解释。 For example, when we visiting a supermarket, maybe we want to buy some food for our family. But it is unrealiable to take all food in the market to our cart taking into account of the people's number of our family and the money in our wallet. So we must draw the conclusion 我觉得这里用的不合适 according to the fact that how much food is enough and which kind of food that my baby would like and other reasons like these . Then, we have completed a choice用词不搭配. Thus, there are various kind of choice in our life, it is a choice that we vote to a candidate for president. and it is also a choice that we choose a perfer cloth in shopping. Making a choice, which has been existed nearly every aspect of our life.

Furthermore, with the rapid progress of science and technology, how to make a correct choice as soon as possible has been an important ability in the modern society, a information exploration society与前面略显重复. There are millions of information havehas been produced every second. We have no time to select as the old methods. And what we can do is just look and choose, as some people has said “ even a wrong answer is better than missing”. 分论点2选择很重要
[分论点3]
On the other hand, although （although多余，前面已经有转折词了）the presence of choice has been an essential circumstance in human society, there is no evidence confirmed the fact that用法很好 the absence of choice is very rare. For example, we live in a small town with only one supermarket, then we have no choice to buy something from it. Or we go into a supermarket with one buck for food, we have to take the cheapest food without choosing. Of course, we can make our means to do some to get the select chance. However, there is something that we never can choose. It is undisputable（ indisputable） that we can not choose our parents,our families, our nations, and our skins, which have been determined when we were born. At the same time, no one want to select only one things when facing the friendship, kindness, warm-heart, honest…all positive morals of human nature. There must be somethings that we can not make a choice and we would rather have no choice. Thus, the absence of choice would not becoming rare in our life.不能选择怎么和不会有很少选择有关系了？这段的论述关系没看懂。

In conclusion, choice is becoming more and more vital in our human lives, yet there must have some thing that we can not choose.

语言很流利，注意一下有些词的用法和搭配。结构论述清晰。两次举例都是超市，是不是第二个例子换成别的什么？这样更有说服力。整体来说写的很好。

lcv8006UID: 2452096

改丹心第三次作业
http://bbs.gter.ce.cn/bbs/viewth ... age=2#pid1773561369

lcv8006UID: 2452096

第七次作业
TOPIC: ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."
WORDS:465

DATE: 2010-2-2 21:23:49

Is it really the surest path to success for any enterprise to refresh the leadership every five years? As for me, I think it would be an effective method to
maintain the normal alternation of the leadership in any organization, however, there is no reasonable evidence proved that the period must be five years.

First of all, it would be more easy to lead to stubborn head for an organization with a permanent leadership. Some one would say that the people in power would become more experience and skillful with a long-time leader office. Nevertheless, no one can deny the fact that everyone would be old. With the increasing of experience and age, it is becoming harder and harder to receive new information and ideas for them. And it has become one of
the most vital ability for a leader to obtain new views and make the correct choice as soon as possible with the rapid progress of our society. For instance, in a company, it is difficult to image that a CEO can not use computer nowadays. It is also unimagation that the leader of a economic committee doesn’t know what is the network economy. And it would be a disaster that there is a policymaker with a stone-head. A new people will bring new vision. The update of leadership will maitain the activity of the enterprise.

Moreover, an unchanged leadership will cause dictatorship, which is the derivation of corruption. There are a great number of examples in view of this point. Such as Suharto, the second president of Indonesia, who had held his office for more than 30 years. In such a long time period he has been the most famous embezzler in the world for grafting countless number of money. Thus, the elimination of corruption radically should begin from the update of leadership.

On the other hand, is it perfect that to alter the learship every five years? Is there enough evidence supported the period? I believe the term would be different in different enterprise, and it seems, to some instant, a little absolutly for five years. The office term should be determined according to the various situation in every profession. For example, in the United States, the president’s term is 4 years. Which has been decided by taking into account the responsibility of the president ,the continuity of the policy and a lot of other reasons. But as the manager of a corporation, whose term is determinded by his achievement, the environment of the company and other things.

In conclusion, the refresh of the leadership would be a normal rule in our society. And for the people in power, it is a momentous plan to realize how and when to step down.

lcv8006UID: 2452096

状态前所未有的烂。同志们使劲拍

lcv8006UID: 2452096

Argument
137The following appeared in an editorial in the Mason City newspaper.

"At present, Mason City residents seldom use the nearby Mason River for any kind of recreational activity, even though surveys of the region's residents consistently rank water sports (swimming, fishing, and boating) as a favorite form of recreation. Since there have been complaints about the quality of the water in the river, residents must be avoiding the river because they think that it is not clean enough. But that situation is about to change: the agency responsible for rivers in our region has announced plans to clean up Mason River. Therefore, recreational use of the river is likely to increase, so the Mason City council will need to increase its budget for improvements to the publicly owned lands along the Mason River."
提纲：
1，调查的真实性和普遍性问题
2，其他原因导致没人去玩
3，缺乏证据表明是水脏导致不去玩。也没有弄干净了就去玩的理由。而且清理河水还只是计划
The argument recommends to increase the buget to improve the publicly owned lands along the river. To support this claim, the author points out that there is going to be an increasing number of people play water sports with the water becoming cleaner in the river. At first glance, the author’s reasoning seems to be appealing, but on examination of it proves to be deeply problematic. We may find that the argument is flawed in several aspects which render it unpersuasive as it stands

First of all, the author recite the surveys to sustain his opinion, however, the reality and generalization of the surveys are open to question. Samples for the surveys should be statistically reliable. Unfortunately, from the surveys we find little sign of such procedures for sampling. Lacking information about the number of residents surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if there are 100 residents were questioned but only 3 people responded, the conclusion that water sports is a favorite recreation form would be highly suspected. At the same time, the author fails to indicate the way the survey conducted. If these questions of survey were leading, people might echo with expected answers, thus the result would be greatly unconvincing.

Secondly, the author draw the conclusion that the residents avoid the river for the water is not clean enough from the complain of some residents. Nevertheless, the argument fails to consider other possible alternative explanations. For instance, the river is not prefer for water sports. It would be too danger to swimming, too shallow to boating, and few fish in water.
In addition, there is no evidence to indicate that the quality of the water is not suitable for water sports. Maybe the complains of the water is which is not clean enough for drink. Of course, there is also no evidence to point out that the water sports would be population nearby the river after the cleanning up of the river. Especially, as to clean up the river is only a plan that the agency responsible for rivers announced, it is too eager to conclude according to a hypothesis.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To strengthen the argument, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the specific date of the residents surveyed, the concrete situation about the river and the definite plan of the cleanning work.

after17UID: 2681985

第七次作业
TOPIC: ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."
WORDS:465

DATE: 2010-2-2 21:23:49

Is it really the surest path to success for any enterprise to refresh the leadership every five years? As for me, I think it would be an effective method to maintain the normal alternation of the leadership in any organization, however, there is no reasonable evidence proved that the period must be five years.

First of all, it would be more easy to lead to stubborn head for an organization with a permanent leadership. Some one would say that the people in power would become more experience and skillful with a long-time leader office. Nevertheless, no one can deny the fact that everyone would be old. With the increasing of experience and age, it is becoming harder and harder to receive new information and ideas for them. And it has become one of
the most vital ability for a leader to obtain new views and make the correct choice as soon as possible with the rapid progress of our society. For instance, in a company, it is difficult to image that a CEO can not use computer nowadays. It is also unimagation （unimaginable ）that the leader of a economic committee doesn’t know what is the network economy. And it would be a disaster that there is a policymaker with a stone-head. A new people (people不可数去掉 a )will bring new vision. The update of leadership will maitain the activity of the enterprise. 这段很好的论证了新领导的好处。举得例子很有说服力

Moreover, an unchanged leadership will cause dictatorship, which is the derivation of corruption. There are a great number of examples in view of this point. Such as Suharto, the second president of Indonesia, who had held his office for more than 30 years. In such a long time period he has been the most famous embezzler in the world for grafting countless number of money. Thus, the elimination of corruption radically should begin from the update of leadership.

On the other hand, is it perfect that to alter the learship every five years? Is there enough evidence supported the period? I believe the term would be different in different enterprise, and it seems, to some instant, a little absolutly（absolutely ） for five years. The office term should be determined according to the various situation in every profession. For example, in the United States, the president’s term is 4 years. Which has been decided by taking into account the responsibility of the president 这句读起来怪怪的,the continuity of the policy and a lot of other reasons. But as the manager of a corporation, whose term is determinded by his achievement, the environment of the company and other things. 这一段写的有点散~

In conclusion, the refresh of the leadership would be a normal rule in our society. And for the people in power, it is a momentous plan to realize how and when to step down.

结构和逻辑都很清晰。注意下拼写和词的用法

lcv8006UID: 2452096

改娃娃衫公主
第七次作业issue
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... age=3#pid1773573998

lcv8006UID: 2452096

7 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper.

"In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearview town council, because the current members are not protecting our environment. For example, during the past year the number of factories in Clearview has doubled, air pollution levels have increased, and the local hospital has treated 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses. If we elect Ann Green, the environmental problems in Clearview will certainly be solved."
提纲：
1、证明现在的镇议会没有保护环境的结论有问题
A 工厂数量翻番与空气污染水平加剧并没有必然联系。
B 医院调查证据的可信度有问题。而且就是出现病人增加，在没有明确数据的支持下，25%没有说服力。而且呼吸系统疾病不一定都与空气污染有关。
2、不能因为Ann是绿党成员就说她一定能改善环境。没有证据证明她能够改善环境。
The letter concludes that the residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green for she can solve the environmental problems of their town. To support this claim, the author points out that the current members of the Clearview town council are not protecting their environment, and Ann Green is a member of the Good Earth Coalition. At first glance, the author’s reasoning seems to be appealing, but on examination of it proves to be deeply problematic. We may find the argument is flawed in several aspects which render it unpersuasive as it stands.

At the beginning, only according to the examples that the author recited, it is difficult to draw the conclusion that the current town council does not protect the environment of Clearview town. Firstly, the author attempts to establish a causal relationship between the fact that the number of factories in Clearview has doubled and the claim that the air pollution levels has increased. This argument, nonetheless, is based on an oversimplified analysis of the cause of air pollution and the presumptuous correlation accordingly is unacceptable. Actually, there may be other factors that could have contributed to air pollution, such as the increasing population of the town, and the global greenhouse effect. And if the factory is working for refuse reclamation, which would benefit the environment protection.

Secondly, the reliability and generalizability of the hospital survey are open to question. The author indicates that there are more 25% respiratory patients than before during last year. However, he doesn’t provide the actually number of resporatory patients before last year. For example, if there are 4 patients in the year before last and there are 5 patients in last year. Is it reliable to conclude the result that the increasing air pollution casued more respiratory illness? Moreover, Even if there is an obviously increased number of respiratory sick, there may be other factors that could have caused it. Such as the acute change of weather, the circumstance of living, and some unhealthy living habits. Thus, from what the author has indicated, it is weakness to claim that the council does not protect the town’s environment.

In addition, there is no evidence provides that if Ann Green becomes the mayoral, the enviornment will be solved. the author indicates no other information but she is a member of a enviornmental protection organization tosupport his argument, nevertheless, no one can deny the fact that to make a commitment is one thing, to keep it is far more difficult. There is no indication that she might fulfill her promise. Consequently, the author could not make any prediction.

To sum up, the recommedation is ill conceived and poorly supported . Regardless of who the author is, he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore many aspects of his or her conclusion. To strengthen the argument, the author must consider and rule out more evidences about the above-mentioned possibilities.

SasakiKojiroUID: 2678315

第八次作业

本帖最后由 lcv8006 于 2010-2-5 00:27 编辑 7 The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Clearview newspaper. "In the next mayoral election, residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green, who is a member of the Good Earth Coalition, rather than for Frank Braun, a member of the Clearview town council, because the current members are not protecting our environment. For example, during the past year the number of factories in Clearview has doubled, air pollution levels have increased, and the local hospital has treated 25 percent more patients with respiratory illnesses. If we elect Ann Green, the environmental problems in Clearview will certainly be solved." 提纲： 1、证明现在的镇议会没有保护环境的结论有问题 A 工厂数量翻番与空气污染水平加剧并没有必然联系。 B 医院调查证据的可信度有问题。而且就是出现病人增加，在没有明确数据的支持下，25%没有说服力。而且呼吸系统疾病不一定都与空气污染有关。 2、不能因为Ann是绿党成员就说她一定能改善环境。没有证据证明她能够改善环境。 The letter concludes that the residents of Clearview should vote for Ann Green for she can solve the environmental problems of their town. To support this claim, the author points out that the current members of the Clearview town council are not protecting their environment, and Ann Green is a member of the Good Earth Coalition. At first glance, the author’s reasoning seems to be appealing, but on examination of it proves to be deeply problematic. We may find the argument is flawed in several aspects which render it unpersuasive as it stands. At the beginning, only according to the examples that the author recited, it is difficult to draw the conclusion that the current town council does not protect the environment of Clearview town. Firstly, the author attempts to establish a causal relationship between the fact that the number of factories in Clearview has doubled and the claim that the air pollution levels has increased. This argument, nonetheless, is based on an oversimplified analysis of the cause of air pollution and the presumptuous correlation accordingly is unacceptable. Actually, there may be other factors that could have contributed to air pollution, such as the increasing population of the town, and the global greenhouse effect. And if the factory is working for refuse reclamation, which would benefit the environment protection. Secondly, the reliability and generalizability of the hospital survey are open to question. The author indicates that there are more 25% respiratory patients than before during last year. However, he doesn’t provide the actually number of resporatory patients before last year. For example, if there are 4 patients in the year before last and there are 5 patients in last year. Is it reliable to conclude the result that the increasing air pollution casued more respiratory illness? (感觉这样说有点牵强)Moreover, Even if there is an obviously increased number of respiratory sick, there may be other factors that could have caused it. Such as the acute change of weather, the circumstance of living, and some unhealthy living habits（稍微写几个例子会更明确）. Thus, from what the author has indicated, it is weakness to claim that the council does not protect the town’s environment.   In addition, there is no evidence provides that if Ann Green becomes the mayoral, the enviornment will be solved. the author indicates no other information but she is a member of a enviornmental protection organization to support his argument, nevertheless, no one can deny the fact that to make a commitment is one thing, to keep it is far more difficult. There is no indication that she might fulfill her promise. Consequently, the author could not make any prediction. 这段中应写到Ann Green不能解决问题的几个例子 To sum up, the recommedation is ill conceived and poorly supported . Regardless of who the author is, he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore（LZ确定这样表达对吗？） many aspects of his or her conclusion. To strengthen the argument, the author must consider and rule out more evidences about the above-mentioned possibilities. PS:感觉LZ模板用的稍稍有点多 嘿嘿。。

lcv8006UID: 2452096

第十次作业

TOPIC: ISSUE56 - "Governments should focus more on solving the immediate problems of today rather than trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future."
WORDS: 430
TIME: 00:60:00


Which is more momentous for governments to pay more attention to solving the immediate problems of today or the anticipated problems of the future? As for me, I believe, it is undisputable to try our best to resolve the immediate problems, however, we should put enough energy on the anticipated problems of the future at the same time.

First of all, the immediate problems must be resolved as soon as possible, because they are most acute questions in the society, which are concerned about the living of lots of people and social security. For example, because of the earthquake, there are millons of people in Haiti who are suffering the pain of hurt and facing the danger of the starving and exposure. It needs the struggle of government and the international society as quickly as they can do. And just like the somali pirates, if they can not be solved rapidly, would be the biggest treat of the ship-line. Thus, for any government, it is totaly reasonable to pay attention to solving the immediate problems.

However, where the immediate peoblems come from? Besides of some natural accidents, such as the Haiti earthquake and the Indian Ocean Tsunami, most of them have derived from some small things which would have been the anticipated problems that the earlier people should have solved. For instance, the Millennium Bug, a biggest question which had entangled a large number of computer scientists for nearly ten years, just derived from a desire to save the memory room of hardware of early engineers. So, when the governments focus on solving the immediate problems of today, it is equal important for the anticipated problems for they would become immdeiate
in the future.

Moreover, nowadays there are lots of anticipated problems which are becoming more and more serious. Such as our globel are warmer and warmer, the sea level is being higher than before, and the disappearance of rainforest, the shortage of enery. Many of them don’t effect our life obviously at this time, nevertheless, if there is no effort were put on them how our world would be after ten yeares or twenty years? Any government, who is blind to this point, will pay a heavy price which they cannot affort it.


In conclusion, for any government, the immediate problems are urgent, which need to be solve as soon as possible. Yet they are not contrary to the anticipated problems which the government should contribute enough effort on them. So, a successful government would keep an excellent balance between them.

lcv8006UID: 2452096

改SasakiKojiro 第八次作业
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... age=1#pid1773588635