- 最后登录
- 2013-11-30
- 在线时间
- 327 小时
- 寄托币
- 757
- 声望
- 44
- 注册时间
- 2009-12-29
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 30
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 632
- UID
- 2743584

- 声望
- 44
- 寄托币
- 757
- 注册时间
- 2009-12-29
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 30
|
69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
We modern people benefit from the fruits of science researches a lot, with cellphones making it possible to talk remotely and computer simplifying everyday work and other numerous facilities making our life easy. However, some researches, at the same time, endangered the security of the whole society and challenge the masses' moral toleration which may result in social turbulence. Since the government bears the responsibility to protect its citizens, it should place moderate limitations on the effect-unexpected topics.
Some fields unknown for people and mostly dangerous or too moral-challenging for people should be limited. Many new trends in the advanced science branches come out every day, which may not be publicly known but have close relations with the public. These secret projects hidden from ordinary people, if let alone, may boom a bad effect in the future while restricted properly may give unexpected interests. For example, the atomic bomb studied by USA during the second war has cause a blood bath in Japan. Before this event, nobody outside Manhattan could anticipate the bomb and imagine such bleak ruins it would leave. While it was actually made and set off on a populated area with a shadow in the history. Of course, that atomic bomb was aimed to cease war, but should it be the proper choice according to that situation? Afraid not, since its desperate ruining power. And the reason why we adopt the last choice may lie in the fact we hold it and insufficient knowledge of its effect. If we had not hold this weapon, we may search for a better means from a whole perspective. What's more, nuclear weapons are becoming the pursuit of some irresponsible countries and terrorists, which may form a new threat to the security of the world. On the other hand, nuclear power stations working like a gradually exploding atomic bomb have offer a cleaner energy compared to coal and more efficiency than fire ones. In France energy of this kind takes most of its electricity supply. Thus nuclear science is both beneficial and dangerous for people, but at the beginning of its development no individual could foresee so far and have the ability to influence the field. In this case governments should play the role of prophets and play restrictions on the suspicious fields.
To what extent the restrictions would be remains a good issue too: too deep, hinder its normal development of good side while too superficial, no effect at all. Colon serves as a good example. In 1997, the first cloned sheep comes into birth with a worldwide watch and followed by a heated argument about whether we should try to colon people. This even spreads to the Congress. America made laws banning such research as it would destroy the basic human moral, respect lives. While this field develops, it’s possible that cloned organs may turn facts now. As it may also surpass someone's baseline, it may again become a hot topic. What attitude we hold to it remains to be seen. If we put too harsh restrictions, thousands of lives which could be saved may sacrifice. If we just turn a blind eye to its development, maybe out comes a disguised clonal human research. So when dealing with such problems government should ponder carefully enough for a winner-winner result.
In conclusion human in front of mysterious nature is still ignorant to some degree, and we cannot afford to pay price for wrong science research on the behalf of the interest of all the humans. So government should make the balance of whether and how to make restrictions.
自评,
开头,很棘手。中间写作时思路不流畅。想到了写不出来,而且思路转瞬即逝。结尾不知该明确改过全文思路。还是适当展开,重述观点更好。语言还是个大问题,写跟不上想。素材单一。
解决:
1多写形成风格。2I+1A
2坚决贯彻提纲,不能边写边改太多,思路要清晰,全神贯注。
3 看college writing,每日一评。精华总结思路。
4 TOEFL,词汇积累复习早起第一件事 |
|