tomatoo的独立作文

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 4 天前 16:48 | 只看该作者 BY lxg198607

本帖最后由 lxg198607 于 2010-1-29 16:53 编辑 I agree with the statement that usually having meals with family members really means too much to everybody. People are always so busy with their working and studing that they have no much time for spending （直接用spent应该跟方便吧。。）with their families. So often eating at home with families is absolutely good for promoting happy and harmonious familiy.: ^4 Y2 A) X) ` u5 }* K& [5 O8 S# y, ~; A% R8 w First of all, if we were children, we will be （是不是要用虚拟语态，我对语法也不太熟悉，你最好查一下书）looking forward to spend more time with our parents and grandparents. Because we want to talk with them about our studies, ideas, dreams, future and so on, and then get some suggestions from them. We also have so many questions and dilemma to ask them for some help. Familiy members are always the first choice to ask for because they are our nearest and dearest. However, the adults are always focus on their jobs during the working time so that children have few oppotunites to get together with adults. The children’s most expectant time is the dinner hour when they could spend with families. children really need to communicate with adults. With more communication between children and parents, the children will grow up more healthily and happily. So the adults really need to eat at home with families as possible as they can.9 |( N# U4 [+ i) y Secondly, if we were the parents, I mean the middle generation, we also want to have more chances to have dinner with our children and our parents. We are under too much strain these days, so we really need to relax ourselves. But how to relax? The best way is to spend more time with our families, because they could make us feel comfortable easily. For example, when we come back home from office everyday, our children always give us a sweet kiss after I open the door. The table is always full of our favorite food (这句给我感觉不太对，像是食物充满了桌子，而不是你想要表达的桌子上全都是iwo喜爱的食物)which are cooked by our elder （这可去掉吧，家长肯定比我们年长啊。嘿嘿）parents, etc.. All of these can help me feel light-hearted and happy. That is why the dinner time with families is so attactive and important.2 a6 U9 w9 }' n0 M/ p) H Finally, if we were the grandparents, we will intensely desire the dinner time. Because we always feel lonely, especialy those whose lose their spouses. We just want to spend more time with those children and the grandchildren. In many areas, we can not keep up with the times, but the only thing we are confident （这后面应该介词吧，改sure不知怎样）is that we can cook the delicious food for the children. Meanwhile, we need more care from the children too. We hope that they could pay more attention（s） to us which can make us feel much better. But the fact is middle generation(不知道有没有这用法) are not live together with the elder generation, the elder generation can only expect to have dinner with the children to increase the times they get together. So I will never emphasize the importance of dinner time enough. Regardless of how old you are, what you do,where you are, please eat with families as possibe as you can." }. r1 |, b& m6 f, g) i4 Z- E suggestions: 全文写的很不错，例子丰富，句式多样，基本找不出什么语法错误。

mlgb,    i am tortured by  ibt

tomatooUID: 2754865

BY EDDIE 1.28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for families to regularly eat their meals together.5 ~8 a0 {, v* \/ t  u I agree with the statement that usually having meals with family members really means too much to everybody. People are always so busy with their working and studing that they have no much time for spending with their families. So often eating at home with families is absolutely good for promoting happy and harmonious familiy. (开头表达主旨鲜明，我喜欢) k- w First of all, if we were (still) children, we will (would) be looking forward to spend more time with our parents and grandparents. Because we want to talk with them about our studies, ideas, dreams, future and so on, and then get some suggestions from them. We also have so many questions and dilemma to ask them for some help. Familiy members are always the first choice to ask for because they are our nearest (closest) and dearest. However, the adults are always focus on their jobs during the working time so that children have few oppotunites to get together with adults (them). The children’s most expectant time is the dinner hour when they could spend with families. children really need to communicate with adults (此句开头的children与前句开头的children有点重复了，不妨把这句改写一下). With more communication between children and parents, the children will grow up more healthily and happily. So the adults really need to eat at home with families as possible as they can. (句式显得有点单一，有些句子可以改写一下，有些前后两句主语都是一样的，这样就给人一种重复的感觉)+ e0 P3 |" w7 c Secondly, if we were the parents, I mean the middle generation, we also want to have more chances to have dinner with our children and our parents. We are under too much strain these days, so we really need to relax ourselves. But how to relax? The best way is to spend more time with our families, because they could make us feel comfortable easily. For example, when we come back home from office everyday, our children always give us a sweet kiss after I (前后指代不一致，we) open the door. The table is always full of our favorite food which are cooked by our elder parents, etc.. All of these can help me feel light-hearted and happy. That is why the dinner time with families is so attactive and important. $ }+ y' R$ H9 J. _, a 1 G7 F4 [$ j1 k$ |* K Finally, if we were the grandparents, we will intensely desire the dinner time. Because we always feel lonely, especialy those whose lose their spouses. We just want to spend more time with those children and the grandchildren. In many areas, we can not keep up with the times, but the only thing we are confident is that we can cook the delicious food for the children. Meanwhile, we need more care from the children too. We hope that they could pay more attention to us which can make us feel much better. But the fact is middle generation are not live together with the elder generation, the elder generation can only expect to have dinner with the children to increase the times they get together. So I will never emphasize the importance of dinner time enough. 6 J! I5 n1 n" l# q/ K/ J Regardless of how old you are, what you do,where you are, please eat with families as possibe as you can.3 h# d. w8 C0 X, Y0 v# k! @ 结构很新颖，能站在三个不同家庭角色的角度上陈述问题，开头主旨鲜明，不错！只是感觉语言表达稍微单一，特别是句式，还有有些意思表达冗赘，感觉稍微简洁一些好！加油！

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 3 天前 12:33 | 只看该作者

要用虚拟语气，if we were the children, we would 桌上放满食物用：The table groaned with food. or  The table spread with food. 加强句式多样性！

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 4 天前 14:59 | 只看该作者



tomatoo1,29writing

1.29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems present and future is it necessary to understand the past? While some people emphasize great importance of keeping up with times, others argue that the significance of learning the past in problem solving should not be rejected or neglected. To examine whether it is necessary to deal with difficulties and make decisions, we have to look carefully into further details. There are circumstances where the history can help us understand and appreciate the mores and values which could prevent the repeating mistakes. Based on these values and ideals, people can determine how to manage those problems similar with the past. As the President Abraham Lincoln said:” We know nothing of what will happen in future, but by the analogy of past experience.” Here is an example. After the western developed countries experienced economic crisises many times, they studied these events and analyse the reasons. According to learn from the past, the cycle of the economic crisis is longer and longer. So understanding past successes and failures enable people to confront their challenges more advisably to some extent. At this point, it is necessary to learn the past. On the other hand, there also are inverse conditions. Just because the world is changing all the time and the differences between individuals are tremendous, the past answers are totally inadequate for our current and future questions.. In the past, the medical science is not developed, people could just deal with diseases according to their experience. But now it is not necessary to use those old methods because the medical science can easily help patients recover in many diseases. The point worth mentioneing is that if the past experience is not scientific or even wrong, you can imagine what the results will be if we formulaically abide by the past solutions. What is more, if we always copy the history without thinking and creating, maybe the human beings’ civilization would stop. All of the above tells us learning the history in a wrong way is deleterious. In conclusion, we need to have our own judgement when to understand the past is necessary and how to learn.

收藏

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 3 天前 13:32 | 只看该作者 BY 小心littleheart

1.29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To solve the problems present and future is it necessary to understand the past?   |- J7 h1 Q+ G; R8 {1 p1 { While some people emphasize（the） great importance of keeping up with times, others argue that the significance of learning the past in problem solving (直接去掉，否则不通顺)should not be rejected or neglected.（在这句话中，while放到逗号后面可能比较好吧，因为不可能文章一上来就开始转折啊）To examine（identify） whether it (指代不明)is necessary to deal with difficulties and make decisions（at present and in future）, we have to look carefully into further details., a' ^  p2 n! f: K# ~1 p & j, E5 I8 r! ` There are circumstances (situations) where the history can help us understand and appreciate the mores and values which could prevent the repeating (same ) mistakes. Based on these values and ideals, (这两个词好像不太恰当吧) people can determine how to manage those problems similar with the past (situation). As the President Abraham Lincoln said:”  We know nothing of what will happen in future, but by the analogy of past experience.” Here is an example.' ?7 H$ E% V( w0 DAfter the western developed countries experienced economic crisises (depression) many times, they studied these events and analyzed the reasons. According to learn (learning) from the past, the cycle of the economic crisis is longer and longer (will be better). So understanding past successes and failures (in the past) enables people to confront their challenges more advisably to some extent (好词). At this point, it is necessary to learn the past.. c  Y% s) W' q; [$ t  m On the other hand, there also are inverse conditions. Just because (Owing to) the world is changing all the time and the differences between individuals are tremendous, the past answers are totally inadequate for our current and future questions (issues).. In the past, the medical science is not (less) developed, (resulting in that) people could just deal with diseases according to their experience. But now it is not necessary to use those old methods because the medical science can easily help patients recover in (from) many diseases. The point worth mentioning is that if the past experience is not scientific or even wrong, you can imagine what the results will be if we (when) formulaically abide (abiding) by the past solutions. What is more, if we always copy the history without thinking and creating (strengthening), maybe the human beings’ civilization would stop. All of the above tells us learning the history in a wrong way is deleterious.7 q& |2 D% n, ] a6 e4 `7 J' W ( d: [! k1 s/ A1 m8 G  S) y In conclusion, we need to have our own judgment when to understand (understanding) the past is necessary and how to learn (去掉，否则不通)$ N3 f/ j3 u: x7 M& k 楼主整体思路比较清楚，结构层次也分的很好~就是语言语法应该在加强一下~呵呵~~注意每个句子结构的完整性以及主谓齐全~还有最重要的是意思通顺~~不然可能不知你所云~~加油~~

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 3 天前 16:15 | 只看该作者



tomatoo1,30writing

1.30 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money on improving public transportation than on improving accessing internet. Since the Chinese population experiences sustainable and rapid growth, it is eager to ameliorate the mass transit condition. On the other hand, on no account can we fall behind other countries in the field of high technology such as the internet. It seems so arduous to decide what to leave out and what to leave in, actually it is not. The public traffic investment from governments must come first based on the following causes. To begin with, the public conveyance is more crucial to people’s daily life comparatively. Because according to Maslow’s hierachy of needs thoery, to pursue the success in high technology such as the internet is the higher level need. We must meet the lower level need first. As we know, so many Chinese have no private transpot that they have no choice to depend on the public ones. As the common people, who must go out to earn their living, they need to commute between home and office. As the ordinary salaried persons, who must keep down the cost of living, they need to choose the cheapest vehicle such as the buses, the subway,etc.. So the mass transit situation is closely related to the general public’s daily life. But the public transpot system is insufficient to supply the demand under the circumstance of the excessive population growth. The traffic jam is potluck; the traffic accidents are also frequent; and so on. So a need for support from the administration is really more desperate. Another worth mentioning is that it is much better to advocate individuals to get their personal computers than private cars. If people can get personal computers to improve the accessing internet by themselves, the government can spend more money insupporting the public transpot. Because encouraging people to get their own computers can definitely help people advance on going internet, while encouraging people to get their own vehicles will bring more serious traffic problems. More cars not only lead heavier traffic, but also contribute to the polluted air by giving off harmful gas. This is the very problem because we can wait if we can not go internet nowadays, but we will be never able to enjoy the fresh and healthy air. So give the financial support to the mass transpot as many as possible. In conclusion, government choosing to pay more attention to the public transit is more advisable which means the country spend more money on the public transport is a better usage rather than on accessing internet.

收藏 分享 评分

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 前天 13:50 | 只看该作者 BY lxg198607

Since the Chinese population experiences sustainable(这个词是否可以用在人口增长上我持保留意见，大多都是形容经济) and rapid growth, it is eager to ameliorate the mass transit condition. On the other hand, on no account can we fall behind other countries in the field of high technology such as the internet. It seems so arduous to decide what to leave out and what to leave in, actually it is not. The public traffic investment from governments must come first based on the following causes.- x6 d+ j/ _: c" N( X + f" M* f( ~3 ~, V$ p To begin with, the public conveyance is more crucial to people’s daily life comparatively. Because according to Maslow’s hierachy of needs thoery, to pursue the success in high technology such as the internet is the higher level need. We must meet the lower level need first.（这个Example不错） As we know, so many Chinese have no private transpot that they have no choice（感觉可以去掉） to depend on the public ones. As the common people, who must go out to earn their living, they need to commute between home and office. As the ordinary salaried persons, who must keep down the cost of living, they need to choose the cheapest vehicle such as the buses, the subway,etc.. So the mass transit situation is closely related to the general public’s daily life. But the public transpot system is insufficient to supply the demand under the circumstance of the excessive population growth. The traffic jam is potluck; the traffic accidents are also frequent; and so on. So a need for support from the administration is really more desperate.' B4 H# I. o8 [. O; ?; ~0 | }3 L # k' c3 f1 s6 Q7 ~: Z& Q2 m# F" a7 w# d: T Another worth mentioning is that it is much better to advocate individuals to get their personal computers than private cars. If people can get personal computers to improve the accessing internet by themselves, the government can spend more money insupporting the public transpot. Because encouraging people to get their own computers can definitely help people advance on going internet, while encouraging people to get their own vehicles will bring more serious traffic problems. More cars not only lead heavier traffic, but also contribute to the polluted air by giving off harmful gas. This is the very problem because we can wait if we can not go internet nowadays, but we will be never able to enjoy the fresh and healthy air. So give the financial support to the mass transpot as many as possible.! C  Y. ~/ k8 {+ `# B% ~# ]/ c 4 I, _( Z6 Z0 t& w# T4 A0 K; N6 V  Y g2 ~) w4 Q n5 t) S' J' S* N3 o. T pay more attention to the public transit is more advisable which means the country spend more money on the public transport is a better usage rather than on accessing internet.: I3 i) ?3 T! z1 i) X0 _ Excellent job... but there is something i want to point out is your third paragraph seems not to closely related to your ideas. It is more like a solution to this problem but not a support of your main idea.

mlgb,    i am tortured by  ibt

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 前天 20:48 | 只看该作者 BY  皇甫秋荻

本帖最后由 皇甫秋荻 于 2010-1-31 20:49 编辑 Since the Chinese population experiences sustainable and rapid growth, it is eager to ameliorate the mass transit condition. On the other hand, on no account can we fall behind other countries in the field of high technology such as the internet. It seems so arduous to decide what （which） to leave out and what （which）2 g1 X( v% F# b1 a. r# y to leave in, （while） actually it is not. The public traffic investment from governments must come first based on the following causes.; P1 O6 Y8 B. R3 c3 _ To begin with, the public conveyance is more crucial to people’s daily life comparatively .Because according to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs thoery （theory）, to pursue the success in high technology such as the internet is the higher level need. We must meet the lower level need first. As we know, so many Chinese have no private transpot 2 p: Y  C: K3 U; d( W$ K6 Q$ x （transport）that they have no choice to depend on the public ones. As the common people, who must go out to earn their living, they need to commute between home and office. As the ordinary salaried persons, who must keep down the cost of living, they need to choose the cheapest vehicle such as the buses, the subway,etc.. So the mass transit situation is closely related to the general public’s daily life. But the public transpot （transport） system is insufficient to supply the demand under the circumstance of the excessive population growth. The traffic jam is potluck; the traffic accidents are also frequent; and so on. So a need for support from the administration is really more desperate.% }( ]4 @! l; x' k + v$ K& j, G/ D* B. l+ X5 N' O8 R Another worth mentioning is that it is much better to advocate individuals to get their personal computers than private cars. If people can get personal computers to improve the accessing internet by themselves, the government can spend more money （on）insupporting the public transpot （transport）. Because encouraging people to get their own computers can definitely help people advance on going internet, while encouraging people to get their own vehicles will bring more serious traffic problems. More cars not only lead heavier traffic, but also contribute to the polluted air by giving off harmful gas. This is the very problem because we can wait if we can not go internet nowadays, but we will be never able to enjoy the fresh and healthy air. So give the financial support to the mass transpot as many as possible. w7 X) Q6 a0 I3 l  P( M In conclusion, government choosing to pay more attention to the public transit is more advisable which means the country spend more money on the public transport is a better usage rather than on accessing internet.（此句读不通，In conclusion, choosing to pay more attention to the public transit is more advisable which means$ w0 @: Z6 H* {! W, e- R spending more money on the public transport is a better usage rather than on accessing internet.）- W7 v$ J! p/ z( T! H" F* L 总结：tomatoo的同义转换用的非常的棒！是本文的亮点。: U6 v6 ~! _4 M* Q/ n- J& d& s       但是，有些句子的表达过于复杂，导致一套句子出现多个谓语的情况（咱俩正好相反，我是写的过于简单。哎。共勉！！！）+ f, c1 [/ Z0 V4 X" v4 W" t       tomatoo还要细心，不要再犯单词拼写的错误哈~~~ / Q$ W9 W2 e: q9 x, z4 m. S& O       加油~！

让生如夏花之绚烂，死如秋叶之静美！

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 前天 15:03 | 只看该作者



tomatoo1,31writing

1.31 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual. I do believe that it is impossible for social individuals to solve the problems of enrironmental. The reasons are as follows. First of all, many environmental deteriorations which are not caused by human beings will continue to worsen no matter how hard the whole society try, not to mention the social individuals. As we know, desertification has been estimated that more and more of earth’s land surface is threatened by this process, and parts of it result from the natural processes. Obviously, the individual, even the whole of mankind can do nothing about it, because they even can not solve the ones are caused by humans. Under this circumstance, the individual is to desertification what the moth to fire. Secondly, those environmental problems which do come from the people’s activities can only be overcomed by the whole society, not the individual. The issues including global warming, shortages of resouse, air pollution and water pollution, etc.,are too difficult for individual to prevent. For instance, the global warming mainly caused by the carbon dioxide needs efforts between countries, not individuals. You can imagine what is the result if others are blind to the gas emissions while you are reducing the times you drive you car as possible as you can. It means nothing. The gas emissons will still increase and the global warming will be more and more serious. So it is necessary for governments to cooperate with each other. Another point worth mentioning is that the views stated above do not mean that the individuals is not significant for protecting our environment. On the contrary, it is the individuals contribute to the whole society. Whether the goverments or orgnizations work effectively, it depends on the each individual. So the individuals need to try their best to obey those policies made by administration while the goverments advocate or even force people to make efforts together. To sum up, the environment issue caused by humans is better to solve by governments than by the individuals. And the individuals are supposed to work in conjunction with the governments.

收藏 分享 评分

我负责努力赚钱，也负责美丽妖娆。

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 昨天 10:05 | 只看该作者 BY jbc88

1.31 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual. I do believe that it is impossible for social individuals to solve the problems of enrironmental. The reasons are as follows（去s）.6 k0 m2 @8 U. @/ c' c% S ' b# i6 F6 h+ f/ BFirst of all, many environmental deteriorations（好词） which are not caused by human beings will continue to worsen no matter how hard the whole society try, not to mention the social individuals. As we know, desertification has been estimated that more and more of earth’s land surface is threatened by this process, and parts of it result from the natural processes. Obviously, the individual, even the whole of mankind can do nothing about it, because they even can not solve the ones are caused by humans. Under this circumstance, the individual is to desertification what（likes） the moth to fire.(好比喻) ~! U/ y# E4 q7 b 9 b. b" ~( k( {0 { Secondly, those environmental problems which do come from the people’s activities can only be overcomed by the whole society, not the individual. The issues including global warming, shortages of resouse, air pollution and water pollution, etc.,are too difficult for individual to prevent. For instance, the global warming mainly caused by the carbon dioxide needs efforts between countries, not individuals. You can imagine what is the result if others are blind to the gas emissions while you are reducing the times you drive you car as possible as you can. （so）It means nothing. The gas emissons will still increase and the global warming will be more and more serious. So it is necessary for governments to cooperate with each other. J! k9 ^! d* b2 Z: K* u5 D+ j Another point worth mentioning is (that the views stated above do not)建议删去 mean that the individuals is not significant for protecting our environment. On the contrary, it is the individuals contribute to the whole society. Whether the goverments or orgnizations work effectively, it（they） depends(depend) on the each individual.# f2 S8 ?' Q9 y1 a/ R8 z  K So the individuals need to try their best to obey those policies made by administration while the goverments advocate or even force people to make efforts together- X% h6 c$ L* {0 z% U7 D$ o4 ^   h& ^" J8 v! O To sum up, the environment issue caused by humans is better to solve by governments than by the individuals. And the individuals are supposed to work in conjunction with the governments.- i( ]" {% T( L: w5 V 0 ~) P: N& c, @ 切入点很好，分为人为的和非人为的，让文章写起来轻松了。句式也很多变。 缺点：直到第2段都很好，第3段开始引入政府和个人，结尾段则彻底说了政府和个人。建议在开头直接将政府和个人提出来。在论述，保持文章的整体性。

tomatooUID: 2754865

发表于 昨天 13:11 | 只看该作者

本帖最后由 baitao8866 于 2010-2-1 19:25 编辑 3 M, I5 `1 m) T: l8 O' U# @ 1.31 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual. Q8 I I do believe that it is impossible for social individuals to solve the problems of enrironmental. The reasons are as follows.（还是那天和duck说过的一样，开头最好不要这么生硬，最好交代一下背景，这方面我觉得开头和结尾时要准备模板的，中间不用。有这些程式，可以把题目和你的文章平滑连接，行文显得流畅，自然。当然了，我看120上的文章都是你这样的，不过我也不知道到底他那样子是否就能得到高分。） k1 P( u7 z( ?  g0 z5 M First of all, many environmental deteriorations which are not caused by human beings will continue to （be）worsen no matter how hard the whole society try, not to mention the social individuals. As we know, desertification has been estimated that more and more of earth’s land surface is threatened by this process(More and more land are being under the threaten of the process of desertification,总觉得上面那个句子怪怪的...), and parts of it result from the natural processes. Obviously, the individual, even the whole of mankind （补一个逗号）can do nothing about it, because they even can not solve the ones are caused by humans.（第一，because最好另起一句第二，因果关系不成立...不能解决人类创造的麻烦就不能解决大自然的问题吗？人类的进化史就是对大自然的改造史...就直接说现在改造耗资巨大没有哪个国家能承受起就好了） Under this circumstance, the individual is to desertification what the moth to fire.（individuals to desertification is what ...这个比喻是啥意思啊？是渺小的意思吗？西红柿姐姐告诉我~ ） : D' T1 w, H Secondly, those environmental problems which do come from the people’s activities can only be overcomed(overcame) by the whole society, not(rather than)( s) O, e5 I) U, k9 K& Q the individual. The issues including global warming, shortages of resouse, air pollution and water pollution, etc(我觉得枚举有点多了，反而影响句子结构，因为主语谓语隔太远了~).,are too difficult for individual to prevent. For instance, the global warming (这个which不能省)mainly caused by the carbon dioxide needs efforts between（这个介词我有些怀疑，就是国家之间的努力？国家之间是哪？不过我也不确定能不能这么用） countries, not individuals. You can imagine what is the result if others are blind to the gas emissions while you are reducing the times you drive you car as possible as you can. It means nothing. The gas emissons will still increase and the(situation of) global warming will be more and more serious. So it is necessary for governments to cooperate with each other." （结尾这个总结最好加上而不是个人，点一下题） Another point worth mentioning is that the views stated above do not mean that the individuals is not significant for protecting our environment. On the contrary, it is the individuals （who）contribute to the whole society. Whether the goverments or orgnizations work effectively, it depends on the each individual.So the individuals need to try their best to obey those policies made by administration while the goverments advocate or even force people to make efforts together.(这句话最好和前面断开); f6 Z- }1 ^9 O1 D% L, m ( V" e/ H1 x/ D( f3 d$ }+ ~+ | To sum up, the environment issue caused by humans is better to solve by governments than by the individuals. And the individuals are supposed to work in conjunction with the governments

tomatooUID: 2754865

to baitao:

Under this circumstance, the individual is to desertification what the moth to fire.（individuals to desertification is what ...这个比喻是啥意思啊？是渺小的意思吗？西红柿姐姐告诉我~ ）

呵呵，我是想说，个人去救环境问题的力量，如去救火的飞蛾。好像有点changlish,呵呵！

tomatooUID: 2754865

2.2 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is being in a group led by a tourist guide.

At first thought, traveling followed the tour guide seems more efficiently and effectively. If we think it over, however, the journey spend just with family is the fantastic one.

One the one hand, traveling with family members can definitely help us relax the pressures which are from the severe competetitions in our lives. During this kind of journey, we can decide everything at will, like where to go, when to start, how long to stay, etc.. For instance, I am going to have a three-day’s trip, I can drive my own car, taking my whole family, to wherever we want. If we are attracted by a beatiful clear lake when driving though it, we can immediately cease going without thinking. What is more, if it is really too fascinating to leave, we can give up our original destination to spend three days on enjoying it. See? This is free, which is the very meaning of traveling. On the contrary, you will never taste such kind of freedom when traveling with a lot of strangers led by the guide. The only thing we can do is in a hurry. From our home to the travel agency, then to the destination, then the next destination…, we need to in a hurry on all these ways. Under this circurmstance, all I get is anxiety.

On the other hand, to travel with family can promote family harmony, while with strangers which would never meet again is really boring. Because we do not know each other, we have to talk with each other reserved and even do not want to communicate with each other. Moreover, different people have different habits and opinions, which sometimes may brings some conflicts, especilly in a long journey. But if we go for a travel with our dearest familiy members, the situation will be greatly distinct. We can play games, singing, even joking and talking which are really a good way to enhance the family ties. Because at ordinary time, the adults are busy with their working while the chidren are busy with they study. They have so few opportunities to communicate with each other. Luckily, we can choose to have a jouney with family to make up this pity.

In sum, spening the jouney time with family is much better than with strangers led by tour guide.

tomatooUID: 2754865

2.3 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People will feel happier when they finish a challenging or difficult work than they finish an easy work.

People in the world are playing different roles to complete their own missions, which can be divided into two groups: the challenging one and the easy one. Which kind of mission can enable people to feel happier? It is difficult to make a conclusion and depends on more details.

First of all, if we can choose a job from a challenging one and an easy one both of which are significant and pleasing, undoubtly the challenging one will earn people’s preference. Under this circumstance, challenge can always endewed people with passion, passion can help people work energetically to succeed, and success can definitely satisfiy people’s spirit needs. There exsit some other situations, however, in which the challenging will just increase people’s annoyance like that the job is really meaningless and involuntary. For instance, my elder brother, as a PhD in medicincal area, who likes doing reaserch and isn’t interested in clinic, are expected to be a wonderful doctor. Becoming a excellent doctor of course is a difficult work, but the point is he doesn’t like it at all. To my brother, this is just such a terrible thing, not mention to make him feel happy. So we need to consider that whether the assignment is important and exhilarating to examine which people prefer.

Secondly, people’s different characteristics induce different choices in the same task. Individuals who always take things as they are, will more willing to select effortless jobs, while the enterprising persons will like taking risks and fighting againest troubles. Lazy guys can be found everywhere like the gamblers in the casino. In their minds, this is the easiest way to earn money, so they are absolutely attracted by this sort of things. To them the challenge job which needs too much struggle is just the mission impossible. I bet they will never take it into accout not to mention choosing it when there is a easier one. As a result, we should learn the person’s personality before we get the judgement about which can make people happier.

Based on the interpretation above, it is rather superficial to say which kind of job can meet the expectations of people better. We are supposed to consider both the work’s features and the individual’s personality.

lxg198607UID: 2564115

At first thought, traveling followed the tour guide seems more efficiently and effectively. If we think it over, however, the journey spend (spent)just with family is the fantastic one.

One the one hand, traveling with family members can definitely help us relax the pressures which are from the severe competetitions in our lives. During this kind of journey, we can decide everything at will, like where to go, when to start, how long to stay, etc.. For instance, I am going to have a three-day’s trip, I can drive my own car, taking my whole family, to wherever we want. If we are attracted by a beatiful clear lake when driving though it, we can immediately cease going without thinking. What is more, if it is really too fascinating to leave, we can give up our original destination to spend three days on enjoying it. See? This is free, which is the very meaning of traveling. On the contrary, you will never taste such kind of freedom when traveling with a lot of strangers led by the guide. The only thing we can do is in a hurry. From our home to the travel agency, then to the destination, then the next destination…, we need to in a hurry on all these ways. Under this circurmstance, all I get is anxiety.

On the other hand, to travel with family can promote family harmony, while the onewith strangers which would never meet again is really boring. Because we do not know each other, we have to talk with each other reserved and even do not want to communicate with each other. Moreover, different people have different habits and opinions, which sometimes may brings some conflicts, especilly in a long journey. But if we go for a travel with our dearest familiy members, the situation will be greatly distinct. (这句有点怪)We can play games, singing, even joking and talking which are really a good way to enhance the family ties. Because at ordinary time, the adults are busy with their working while the chidren are busy with they study. They have so few opportunities to communicate with each other. Luckily, we can choose to have a jouney with family to make up this pity.

In sum, spening the jouney time with family is much better than with strangers led by tour guide.

全文结构清晰，逻辑也不错，美中不足的是第二个论点，为了逃避与别人的交流是否有些消极， anyway, it is a good essay, come on..