- 最后登录
- 2010-11-6
- 在线时间
- 161 小时
- 寄托币
- 439
- 声望
- 12
- 注册时间
- 2010-1-26
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 396
- UID
- 2754865
 
- 声望
- 12
- 寄托币
- 439
- 注册时间
- 2010-1-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
发表于 4 天前 18:03 | 只看该作者 BY mpromanus
Arts and athletics are both a parts of human being’s culture. Governments should support both of them. In my opinion, governments should spend more money and pay more attention about to athletics according to the social situations these days.
" {, E' n4 d5 O
At present, people would like to spend their own money to prompt the arts development of arts. That means governments could spend less money on it. Because after the material requirements? (What are 'material requirements' anyway? If you use 'the', you need to be specific, and I suppose you mean 'material needs'.) are satisfied, people are more likely to persue the spiritual needs. Under this situation, people would like to spend more energy and money on arts. As we know, more and more people are interested in music, literature, films, sculptures, paintings and etc.. Let us take the films as a exmaple: the film Avatar was a huge box office hit. (Keep in mind that conjunctions are needed when you try to put sentences together to form one larger sentence.) This tells us two things: first, this kind of arts is really very flourishing; second, people are willing to spend money on it. So governments can spend less money on arts comparatively. (This point is well argued, but, even though government can spend less money on arts, it doesn't mean they'll spend more on athletics. They can spend more money on anything that's not arts. Your question contains two keywords - arts and athletics - for comparison, therefore you need to keep both in sight. It's not enough to argue from one single keyword's perspectives. Without athletics in the picutre, this point is not a complete, valid argument that's able to address the full question.)
) b5 x; |. b2 O! G
On the opposite, people are not doing very well in athletics. They not only they cannot remmerring? to do some excercises to keep healthy, but also they do not want to spend money on it. On the one hand, more and more delicious and attractive food make (Again, I see this very awkward use of 'make'. If you make someone do something, it means you force him. Use more human, active sentences like 'food is getting more and more delicious and attractive, therefore people cannot help but eat excess..') people can not help but eat excessively food. This leads to many serious diseases like adiposity (This is the medical term for 'fat', and 'adipose' is a generic term for 'animal fat'. The standard term for 'being too fat' is 'obesity'.). On the other hand, people are always busy, working hard to accommodate to (This doesn't mean 'adapt'.) the vertiginous environment. So they have no time and energy to care for their health. In addition, most of people are under subhealth condition? (Did you just try to translate 亚健康?). But they do not want to improve their health condition because they always think that they are young and can hold their own untill they get old or fall ill. Under these circumstances, the government should advocate people to pay more attention to the health condition, and the financial surpport is definitely a very good way. (This part of your logic doesn't stand either. People need athletics, yes, because they're not very healthy, but that doesn't mean people don't need the arts, or they need the arts less than they need athletics. As I've said, the question has two keywords, and you need to keep both in mind constantly. Arguing from one single keyword's perspective doesn't address the question adequately enough.)/ n1 @! P. `3 o3 Y0 _5 I7 L
With that said, governments should shoudler the the responsibility to improve people’s health condition. One of the significant things for governments to do is spending more money in support of athletics.1 q/ }3 l* e& T8 h: y1 z
- h' L- k4 h- j
总结:- d% V& v# v) U
语法和词汇还好,没有非常严重的问题,注意一下联结和拼写。。; F9 ^1 y! }; B# \
# L, M% ~8 K2 o, e8 Y9 b# F
逻辑方面,其实你的想法都很好,例子也举得不错,但由于问题是比较性的,所以你的论述也应该以比较性的方式展开,而不是一段光写艺术,一段光写体育。这样子给人留下的反驳空间太多了。另外一个问题就是,题目给了一个such as state-sponsored Olympic teams,你有没有想过为什么?这个特别指出的存在说明这个问题里的athletics并不仅仅是全民运动提倡健身那种体育,而是包括代表国家行为的职业体育,这个范围就更加广了,论述的时候就更需要功力。所以题目的潜台词要特别地注意。
|
"Reading maketh a full man,
conference a ready man,
and writing an exact man."
-- Francis Bacon, <Of Studies> |
|
|