紫日的综合写作

volksrenUID: 2189399

The lecture is mainly about the issue that company should not change work time from five days to four days, which disagree the statement in the passage.
Firstly, in the passage, it is said that hiring more staff to ensure the same amount of work  would not result in additional pay roll costs. However, in the lecture, the speaker holds the opinion that hiring more staff would spend extra money for training , medical care and require more computers and space for them to use, which would lead to cut the profit of a company.
Secondly, in the passage, the speaker believes that a shorter workweek would reduce the unemployment rate. On the contrary, in the listing passage, the speaker raises the opinion that the employees with a four-day workweek will complete the job of a five –day workweek, which means that the company should not hire extra people so that it should not affect the unemployment rate.
Finally, in the passage, it is claims that employees with a four-day work week would have more free time to improve the quality of their lives. However, in the listening passage, the speaker say that it may be reduce the quality of the life because it will have a bad effect on promotion of the employees and even lose one’s job when the economy is not in good condition. Because many company requires the employees to work five days a week to supervise and manage the project continusely.
In sum, the contents in the reading passage are totally refuted by the lecture and the lecture advocates totally different ideas on the topics made in the reading passage.

Alice520UID: 2480263

第一段应该是 disagrees吧
三段都用 in the passage，。。。这样看着挺整齐的但是貌似不太好吧 呵呵 句式变换一下看着还新鲜

第三段的listing 拼错了吧~
第三段 少了一点 unpleasant的那点
so that it should not affect the unemployment rate 这句是不是可以不要了
我觉得前面表达的很清楚了已经~

第四段
it is claims  病句哦~
你第三点写的很全啊~ 比我的好多了~ ^_^

总体写的很好~ 看着简单明了~