argument69 by tequilawine球拍

tequilawineUID: 2702008

TOPIC: ARGUMENT69 - Yellow~legged frogs were once common in high-altitude lakes in the Sierra Nevada mountains, but they have become increasingly rare. Trout feed on tadpoles and young frogs. Few lakes in the Sierra Nevada had any trout in them until a hundred years ago. At that time, many lakes were stocked with trout for recreational fishing, and now trout are common in virtually all bodies of water in the Sierra Nevada. Researchers removed the trout from one lake, and the frog population soon quadrupled. Since frogs are capable of moving several miles over land, removing trout from just a few lakes is clearly the way to restore the frog population to its former levels.
WORDS: 348          TIME: 00:30:00          DATE: 2010-2-6 23:33:21




We can clear know the answer of the situation now from the author is to take action to remove trout from lakes in order to restore the frog population to its former levels. Allow me to say, without more evidence and explanation, i can not agree to do such thing hastily, because we can figure out some fallacies or unilateral evidence from his illustration.




At first, what we focus on is the difference between frog and Yellow~legged frog, which i mean, author mentioned at first is the latter one, but at last from his conclusion we just learn that what it contains becomes more bigger, for common sense, you know, Yellow-frog is one of frogs. Exaggeration in its extent is not accurate for research aiming at to clarify some problems. You can not say that all prisoners are bad without considering specific diversity. You will feel wronged when someone just blame you for something you didn't do. It's the same as that.




Researchers removed the trout from one lake, and the frog population just accumulated exponentially. You want to convince me to accept the consequence without rule out or exclude some factors that maybe also most important that are in control of the amount of frogs. What about the natural environment, or the less amount of other nature enemies, or proficient food origin? We know truths or axioms are under the examination both in time and science. It maybe can puzzle us for a while, but not for ever. So believe it or not, to make it more compelling, you need dig into it more seriously.

Let's start with our last one. If you read carefully, maybe you should find that author didn't if the frogs really like to want to moving several miles over land to breed, just in the light of assumption, maybe it's a little bit ridiculous to endue them human intelligence. What we say and conclude comes from the analysis deriving from severe operation.




What we knows the correlation did exist between frogs and trout, but if the trout amount can decide the other one is still in wonder.