半夏之北的作文 为4.10二战做准备~~

半夏之北UID: 2517498

2月16号 （08.08.08NA）
University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study。
写了45分钟，果然两个月不写都快忘光了~~
没有修改过的：

According to the local media,some people suggest university students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of their study.So recently ,the issue of
whether it is necessary for university students to learn basic science classes even if it has nothing to do with their major has been posed to people.Those who believe this opinion argues that learning the basic science will contribute to their further study and finding a beneficial job.However,as far as i am concerned,I don't agree with this statement as it will waste time and cause the dissatisfiction aboat the university from students.



To begin with,when some basic science classes become the mandatory classes,it will waste time and money.Clearly,attending the basic science classes will cost time and money since students need to spend time on it and they also need to pay the tuition fees.on the contory,learning something about basic science won't facilitate students who don't study this major to learn their own major,on the controy,it will make them spend less time on studying further aboat their own major.As a consequence,the paying and the gaining is not balanced.A vivid example can be found from one of my friend who
tatolly hates learning
everything about science but love to study chinese literure deeply,if the universtity force her to learn about science,i am pretty sure that she even cannot understand what the teacher is talking about as at high school she cannot understand that.So,for them attending these classes just wastes their time and interferes them to study what they like.it is obviously our surroundings abounds with these examples.



Furthermore,forcing students to attend basic science classes which they don't like will cause complainments.Everyone has different gifts when they was born,so learning basic science will not suitable for everyone.It will be a disater for someone who can not calculate the angles in the triangel to
learn about liner algebra .moreover,as they are in the university ,if they attend these classes,they need to sit for the exams.with no interest and knoeledge about science,they will certainly have much conplainments about the university as it will be difficult for them to pass the exam and failing in the exam will cause them a lot of troubles such as loseing the chance of obtaining the schorship.Ann,One of my roommates,regerets choosing the accounting as her major pretty much as she hate to learn math from the primary school.I can hear that she always make complaints about the university.However,this major is chosen by herself,imagine when the students are forced to learn something they don't like.These conplaines will have negtative effect on the relationship between students and universities which will not comtribute to the development of both of them.

Admittedly,there are some advantages aboat participating in the basic science classes.As when students study more further about their own major ,they will find many subjects will cross,learing it may help them to have a better understanding of their own major.What's more,with the increasingly firce competition,mordern society needs the individuals who have compound knowledge,consequecely,it will make them find a job easier.

Judging from all evidence offered,we may safely arrive at the conclusion that university should not force the students to attend the basic science classes.Though the advantages that taking basic science classes leads to are considerable,they cannot compete with the benefits that giving students more freedom when the disadvantages which are wasting time and destorying the relationship with students and universities are taking into account.Woth respect to these drawbacks, i deem that providing these basic science classes for students who have interest in these can make contributions to improve the situation.

半夏之北UID: 2517498

修改过的：
According to the local media, some people suggest university students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of their study.So recently, the issue of that has been posed to people. Those who believe this opinion argues that learning the basic science will contribute to their further study and finding a well-paid job. However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with this statement as it will waste students’ time and cause the dissatisfaction about the university from students.

To begin with, clearly, when some basic science classes become the mandatory classes, it will waste time and money since students need to spend time attending these classes and they also need to pay the tuition fees. Learning something about basic science won't facilitate students who don't study this major to learn their own major, on the contrary, it will make them spend less time on studying further about their own major. As a consequence, the paying and the gaining is not balanced. A vivid example can be found from one of my friend who totally hates learning everything about science but love to study Chinese literature deeply, if the university forces her to learn about science, I am pretty sure that she even cannot understand what the teacher is talking about as she cannot understand that from high school. So, for this kind of students attending these classes is just wasting their time and hinders them to study what they like. It is obviously our surroundings abound with these examples.

Furthermore, forcing students to attend basic science classes which they don't like will cause complaints. Everyone has different gifts when they were born, so learning basic science will not suitable for everyone. For instance, it will be a disaster for someone who cannot calculate the angles in the triangle to learn about liner algebra .Moreover, as they are in the university, if they attend these classes, they need to sit for the exams. With no interest and knowledge about science, they will certainly have many compliments about the university as it will be difficult for them to pass the exam and failing in the exam will cause them a lot of troubles such as losing the chance of obtaining the scholarship. Ann, one of my roommates, regrets choosing the accounting as her major pretty much as she hates to learn math from the primary school. I can hear that she always make complaints about the university. However, this major is chosen by herself, imagine when the students are forced to learn something they don't like. These complaints will have negative effect on the relationship between students and universities which will not contribute to the development of both of them.

Admittedly, there are some advantages about participating in the basic science classes. As when students study further about their own major, they will find many subjects will cross. Learning it may help them to have a better understanding of their own major. What’s more, modern society needs the individuals who have compound knowledge, consequencely, it will make them find a job easier.

Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that university should not force the students to attend the basic science classes if they are not part of the field of the study. Though the advantages that taking basic science classes leads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that giving students more freedom when the disadvantages which are wasting time and destroying the relationship with students and universities are taking into account. With respect to these drawbacks, I deem that providing these basic science classes for students who have interest in these can make contributions to improve the situation.

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

夏北怎么4月考啊

我是chineseladyUID: 2662783

跟我一天得了

Mason.PDUID: 2592013

According to the local media, some people suggest university students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of their study. So recently, the issue of that has been posed to people. Those who believe this opinion argues that learning the basic science will contribute to their further study and finding a well-paid job. However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with this statement as it will waste students’ time and cause the dissatisfaction about the university from students.   ?9 e* u% m! Q

begin with, clearly, when some basic science classes become the mandatory classes, it will waste time and money since students need to spend time attending these classes and they also need to pay the tuition fees. Learning something about basic science won't facilitate students who don't study this major to learn their own major, on the contrary, it will make them spend less time on studying further about their own major. As a consequence, the paying and the gaining are not balanced. A vivid example can be found from one of my friend who totally hates learning everything about science but love to study Chinese literature deeply, if the university forces her to learn about science, I am pretty sure that she even cannot understand what the teacher is talking about as she cannot understand that from high school. So, for this kind of students attending these classes is just wasting their time and hinders them to study what they like. It is obviously our surroundings abound with these examples.（大赞，思维啊逻辑啊超好，transition words用的尤其赞！我还不知道可以这样举例的，不过这例子确实很好。）
3 S, U* C/ \! O
. @2 M) F- K* x4 J4 t
Furthermore, forcing students to attend basic science classes which they don't like will cause complaints. Everyone has different gifts when they were born, so learning basic science will not suitable for everyone. For instance, it will be a disaster for someone who cannot calculate the angles in the triangle to learn about liner algebra（线性代数？nice） .Moreover, as they are in the university, if they attend these classes, they need to sit for the exams. With no interest and knowledge about science, they will certainly have many complaiments about the university as it will be difficult for them to pass the exam and failing in the exam will cause them a lot of troubles such as losing the chance of obtaining the scholarship. Ann, one of my roommates, regrets choosing the accounting as her major pretty much as she hates to learn math from the primary school. I can hear that she always make complaints about the university. However, this major is chosen by herself, imagine when the students are forced to learn something they don't like.（这种假设式的正反论证也相当好，学习了） These complaints will have negative effect on the relationship between students and universities which will not contribute to the development of both of them.

Admittedly, there are some advantages about participating in the basic science classes. As when students study further about their own major, they will find many subjects will cross. Learning it may help them to have a better understanding of their own major. What’s more, modern society needs the individuals who have compound knowledge. consequencely, (In consequence)it will make(这词俗，换enable) them find a job easier.

W
Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that university should not force the students to attend the basic science classes if they are not part of the field of the study. Though the advantages that taking basic science classes leads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that giving students more freedom when the disadvantages which are wasting time and destroying the relationship with students and universities are taking into account. With respect to these drawbacks, I deem that providing these basic science classes for students who have interest in these can make contributions to improve the situation.
文章写得相当流畅，我要是托福考官就给你满分了，不过我自己也是第一次学写独立作文，我有2个疑问。托福作文的例子可以相当随意，很生活化是么？另外，独立作文没有文字上限要求么？（大赞你的打字速度。我45分钟也只能敲出这么多字）

半夏之北UID: 2517498

4# 我是chineselady
害怕准备不好啊，我都不敢想二战失败了怎么办......

半夏之北UID: 2517498

2.16所学习到得词语和表达
spring out
fundamental
it is the vast extent of
sophisticated theory
generalists通才 specialist 专家
embrace the rich thinking
in retrospect to history回顾历史
no pragmatic实用主义 building
a beacon信号灯 to guide us

半夏之北UID: 2517498

2月17号 （08.03.01NA）
To solve problems present and future is it necessary to understand the past.
正好30分钟
没有修改过的：

According to the local media,many people are debating the function of history,so recently,the issue of whether it is necessary to understand the past when we solve problems present and future has been posed to people.someone who believes this statement argues that history can provide us much valueable experience which can aviod us making some mistakes.However,as far as i am concerned,Idon't agree with opinion as studying the past will cost us time and energy and situations is changing all the time.



To begin with,it is clearly that we need to spend much time on studying the past if we want to find the similar issues which can provide us experience.As we know,finding the similar issues though millions of historical issues is a tough task for people as human beings has  existed on this planet for millions of years.Even though we have computers now,it is still necessary for people to analyse something which the computers cannot.Moreover,we cannot just copy the methods what our ancester used,we need to pick out which is useful for us to solve the problems present and future.Obviously,doing these tasks still need more time ,energy and money.An vivid example can be found from the flooding issues.People want to solve the flooding problems all the time.Imagine now the Yangzi River has some flooding problems ,we cannot use the menthods which were used to treat with the Huang River.And also,in different parts of the Yangzi River,the geography situations is quiet differnt ,in consequence ,we need to find the just same part of it.No doubt,this process will cost us a lot of time.If wen can use this time,maybe we have already solve the problem.Our societ abounds with these examples.



futhermore,the situation is changing all the time ,it is not quiet certain that the historical experience will give us some valuable suggestions and the problems what we face now mayebe not appear in the past.Just like ,in ancient time people use birds to exchange information but now we use internet,so many historical experience will not benefit to us. with the development of society and technology,some important issues such as the environmental problems.It is manifest that in the past our ancesters didn't use the chemical material often and the global warming didn't exist in the past but it is the one of the most significant problems human beings need to face.As a result,if we want to solve this problem ,we cannot find some useful information in history bacasuse it didn't exsit in the past.



Admittedly,the historical experience will provide us some information which can enable us to adoid some mistakes.In the industrial age,most countries  developed their economics at the cost of the pollutions of the environment which is a warning for some developing countries that they cannot do the same way and need to protect the envoronment.



judging from all evidence offered,we may safely arrive at the conclusion that though the advantages that studying the history leads to are considerable ,they cannot compete with the benefits that focusing more on the comtemperrary issues brings out,when the disadvantages which is studying the history will cost more time and energy and maybe it cannot apply for the comtemprary situations,are taking into account.With respect to these drawbacks,i deem that studying the past and concentrate on the present issues at the same time will improve the situations.

半夏之北UID: 2517498

修改过的：
According to the local media, many people are debating the function of history, so recently, the issue of whether it is necessary to understand the past when we solve problems present and future has been posed to people. Someone who believes this statement argues that history can provide us much valuable experience, which can avoid us making some mistakes. However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with the opinion as studying the past will cost us much time and energy and situations are changing all the time.



To begin with, it is clearly that we need to spend much time on studying the past if we want to find the similar issues which can provide us useful experience. As we know, finding the similar issues though millions of historical issues is a tough task for people .Even though we have computers now, it is still necessary for people to analyses something which the computers cannot do. Moreover, we cannot just copy the methods which our ancestor used, we need to pick out the method which is useful for us to solve the problems present and future. Certainly, doing these tasks still need more time, energy and money. A vivid example can be found from the flooding issues. People want to solve the flooding problems all the time. Imagine now the Yangzi River has some flooding problems, we cannot use the methods which were used to treat with the Huang River. And also, in different parts of the Yangzi River, the geography situations is quiet different, in consequence, we need to find just the same part of it. No doubt, this process will cost us a lot of time and energy. If we can make full of use this time, maybe we have already solve the problem. Our society abounds with these examples.



Furthermore, the situation is changing all the time, it is not quite certain that the historical experience will give us some valuable suggestions and the problems what we face now maybe not appear in the past. Just like, in ancient time people used birds to exchange information but now we use the internet, so many historical experience will not benefit to us. with the development of society and technology, some tough problems such as the environmental problems appear. It is manifest that in the past our ancestors didn't use the chemical material often so the global warming didn't exist in the past but it is  one of the most significant problems human beings need to face now. As a result, if we want to solve this problem, we cannot find some useful information in history because it didn't exist in the past.



Admittedly, the historical experience will provide us some information which can enable us to avoid some mistakes. In the industrial age, most countries developed their economics at the cost of the pollutions of the environment which is a warning for some developing countries that they cannot do the same way and need to protect the environment.



Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that though the advantages that studying the history leads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that focusing more on the contemporary issues brings out, when the disadvantages which is studying the history will cost more time and energy and maybe it cannot apply for the contemporary situations are taking into account. With respect to these drawbacks, I deem that studying the past and concentrating on the present issues at the same time will improve the situations.

armstrongUID: 204256

2月17号
（08.03.01NA）& F9 o# ]0 k& Q+ w+ R% m
To solve problems present and future is itnecessary to understand the past.
正好30分钟( ~8 r$ Y; c% P" h6 p. V6@# M. F
没有修改过的：5 u$ [- Z; D% E  B4 i



According to the local media(
不太理解), many people are debatingthe function of history, so recently, the issue of whether it is necessary tounderstand the past when we solve problems present and future has been posed topeople. Someone whobelieves this statement argues（罗嗦了，简洁点，据说ETS比较讨厌模板，一句话里面没有什么具体内容竟是模板了，someone believe） that history can provide usmuch valuable experience, which can avoid us （怎么看就是别扭，us）
making some mistakes.However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with the opinion as studying the past will cost us muchtime and energy and situations are changing all the time.（很好表明了自己的观点，看看下面是否支持的好）
8 o7 e1 j, A" a$ U9 r
* c5 T2 c6 X. R) F, r
To begin with, it is clearly that we need to spendmuch time on studying the past if we want to find the similar issues which canprovide us useful experience（这个句型我们下来讨论一下，好像一般语法和文章上都说定语从组可以简洁的分词结构，当然你这里不错）. As we know（觉得有点口语化了）, finding the similar issuesthough millions of historical issues is a tough task for people .Even though wehave computers now, it is still necessary for people to analyses（analyze） something which thecomputers cannot do. Moreover, we cannot just copy the methods which ourancestor used, we need to pick out the method which is useful for us to solvethe problems present and future（我感觉，说说我的感受，你圆周句用的少，应该长短结合，如果长时间用定语从句会很boring的）.Certainly, doing these tasks still need more time, energy and money. A vividexample can be found from the flooding issues. People want to solve theflooding problems all the time. Imagine now the Yangzi River has some floodingproblems, we cannot use the methods which were used to treat with（用词不太准却，treat一般对人，招待啊，治疗啊，用occur） the Huang River. And also,in different parts of the Yangzi River, the geography situations is quietdifferent（varied）。 in consequence, we need tofind just the same part of it. No doubt（口语化），
可以这样说 it is not doubt that
, thisprocess will cost us a lot of time and energy. If we can make full of use thistime, maybe we have already solve the problem. Our society abounds with theseexamples.( 你是论证了你的ts，但是，觉得很罗嗦，我觉得concise的语言是ets rater比较喜欢的)
6 r: T+ f; d) ~" a# d
8 I0 d8 W, C' c5 H0 w( J, A
2 Z2 q" W1 ]7 R, Z
Furthermore, the situation（the problem always evolves） is changing all the time, itis not quite certain that the historical experience will give us some valuablesuggestions and the problems whatwe face now maybe not appear in the past. Just like(口语词汇太多了), in ancient time peopleused birds to exchange information but now we use the internet, so manyhistorical experience will not benefit to us. with the development of societyand technology, some tough problems such as the environmental problems appear.It is manifest that in the past our ancestors didn't use the chemical materialoften so the global warming didn't exist in the past but it is  oneof the most significant problems去掉s human beings need to facenow. As a result, if we want to solve this problem, we cannot find some usefulinformation in history because it didn't exist in the past.
) V. `! Y2 u1 M% d( c
这段论证的不错，


. O! ]; I, Q- R( @- ?$ S2y9 f
（让步了，好）Admittedly, the historical experience will provide us someinformation which can enable us to avoid some （repeat same）mistakes. In the industrialage（revolution）, most countries developedtheir economics at the cost of the pollutions of the environment （with ignoring the sustainabledevelopment）
which is a warning for some developingcountries that they cannot do the same way and need to protect the environment.. q) Y! o, o# ^1 J! P$ ~* w) r
( ]+ S5 S. C- ?5 h1T  R
4 W0 y: G* ]/ z2 ~4 a
Judging from all evidence offered, we may safelyarrive at the conclusion that though the advantages that studying the historyleads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that focusingmore on the contemporary issues brings out, when the disadvantages which isstudying the history will cost more time and energy and maybe it cannot applyfor the contemporary situations are taking into account. With respect to thesedrawbacks, I deem that studying the past and concentrating on the presentissues at the same time will improve the situations.（说实话模板的痕迹比较清晰，呵呵，其实有模板也好，心里不慌了，我觉得有些罗嗦的模板可以不要，不用凑字数，ets不在乎字数，比如不是有个GRE写作还没写完，还是满分吗？
我觉得ibt写作需要特别特别低级详细的detail，只要有detail，就行）另外的建议，可以尝试把定语从句改写，练习圆周句，长短结合才能好啊。

armstrongUID: 204256

上传个附件吧，

半夏之北UID: 2517498

2.17所学到的
concede
plunged into the trap again
exhausts---damage
it is necessary to take a comprehensive plan and avoid solving a certain problem at the expense of creating another problem.
spark more innovative and effective measures
currently--present
predecessors--ancestors
Columbus discovered America and agured that the earth must be round.
seismology  地震学

hulinlin24UID: 2731389

According to the local media, many people are debating the function of history, so recently, the issue of whether it is necessary to understand the past when we solve problems present and future has been posed to people.（这个好像是purple的自用模板哦） Someone who believes this statement argues that history can provide us much valuable experience, which can avoid us making some mistakes. However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with the opinion as studying the past will cost us much time and energy and（这个可以替换成as well as，与前面的and可以区分） situations are changing all the time.  v* W) Q# e( T; G3 [# g
* C7 a* _1 m' Q9 }1 I$ l
( \) z) l, h5 L2 f) R5 q- m0 Y
7 V6 ~; C; y+ k$ W3 J

To begin with, it is clearly that we need to spend much time on studying the past if we want to find the similar issues which can provide us useful experience. As we know, finding the similar issues though millions of historical issues is a tough task for people .Even though we have computers now, it is still necessary for people to analyses something （by themselves强调亲力亲为）which the computers cannot do. Moreover, we cannot just copy the methods which our ancestor used, we need to pick out the method which is useful（suitable) for us to solve the problems present and future. Certainly, doing these tasks still need more time, energy and money. A vivid example can be found from the flooding issues. People want to solve the flooding problems all the time. Imagine now the Yangzi River has some flooding problems, we cannot use the methods which were used to treat with the Huang River.(我觉得这个例子不够有说服力，用治黄河的办法治扬子江，这是两个概念嘛，你可以说用某个朝代治扬子江的办法用在现代就不合适了，比如现在河岸的居民很多，还要考虑季节变化什么的） And also, in different parts of the Yangzi River, the geography situations is quiet different, in consequence, we need to find just the same part of it. No doubt, this process will cost us a lot of time and energy. If we can make full of use this time, maybe we have already solve the problem. Our society abounds with these examples.$ p! j# \6 X9 w


Furthermore, the situation is changing all the time, it is not quite certain that the historical experience will give us some valuable suggestions and the problems what we face now maybe not appear in the past. Just like, in ancient time people used birds to exchange information but now we use the internet, so many historical experience will not benefit to us. with the development of society and technology, some tough(好词）problems such as the environmental problems appear. It is manifest that in the past our ancestors didn't use the chemical material often so the global warming didn't exist in the past but it is  one of the most significant problems human beings need to face now. As a result, if we want to solve this problem, we cannot find some useful information in history because it didn't exist in the past.

  h9 l$ K1 }5 Z
" D7 I0 x) E+ H, C$ m6 ?" U" i. K
Admittedly, the historical experience will provide us some information which can enable us to avoid some mistakes. In the industrial age, most countries developed their economics at the cost of the pollutions of the environment which is a warning for some developing countries that they cannot do the same way and need to protect the environment.

" c. e! Y5 g; ^, B! D" T* m7 S% B" H
Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that though the advantages that studying the history leads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that focusing more on the contemporary issues brings out, when the disadvantages which is studying the history will cost more time and energy and maybe it cannot apply for the contemporary situations are taking into account. With respect to these drawbacks, I deem that studying the past and concentrating on the present issues at the same time will improve the situations.

划线的是好词，蓝色的好的开头，红色的是需要改动的地方
Purple的作文写得很好，论述得好，特别值得夸奖的是句式变化丰富，词语的多样化，除了第二段的例子有点点小问题以为，写得非常好
第三段对于飞鸽传书被取代和地球污染的问题，我觉得很好

volksrenUID: 2189399

According to the local media, many people are debating the function of history, so recently, the issue of whether it is necessary to understand the past when we solve problems present and future has been posed to people. Someone who believes this statement argues that history can provide us much valuable experience, which can avoid us making some mistakes. However, as far as I am concerned, I don't agree with the opinion as studying the past will cost us much time and energy and situations are changing all the time.


To begin with, it is clearly that we need to spend much time on studying the past if we want to find the similar issues which can provide us useful experience. As we know, finding the similar issues though(through) millions of historical issues is a tough task for people. Even though we have computers now, it is still necessary for people to analyses(analyse) something which the computers cannot do. Moreover, we cannot just copy the methods which our ancestor used, we need to pick out the method which is useful for us to solve the problems present and future. Certainly, doing these tasks still need more time, energy and money. A vivid example can be found from the flooding issues. People want to solve the flooding problems all the time. Imagine now the Yangzi River has some flooding problems, we cannot use the methods which were used to treat with the Huang River. And also, in different parts of the Yangzi River, the geography situations is quiet different, in consequence, we need to find just the same part of it. No doubt, this process will cost us a lot of time and energy. If we can make full of use(make full use of ) this time, maybe we have already solve the problem. Our society abounds with these examples.


Furthermore, the situation is changing all the time, it is not quite certain that the historical experience will give us some valuable suggestions and the problems what we face now maybe not appear in the past. Just like, in ancient time people used birds to exchange information but now we use the internet, so many historical experience will not benefit to(去掉to) us. With the development of society and technology, some tough problems such as the environmental problems appear. It is manifest that in the past our ancestors didn't use the chemical material often so the global warming didn't exist in the past but it is  one of the most significant problems human beings need to face now. As a result, if we want to solve this problem, we cannot find some useful information in history because it didn't exist in the past.


Admittedly, the historical experience will provide us some information which can enable us to avoid some mistakes. In the industrial age, most countries developed their economics at the cost of the pollutions of the environment which is a warning for some developing countries that they cannot do the same way and need to protect the environment.


Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that though the advantages that studying the history leads to are considerable, they cannot compete with the benefits that focusing more on the contemporary issues brings out, when the disadvantages (which is)改成of studying the history will cost more time and energy and maybe it cannot apply for the contemporary situations are taking into account. With respect to these drawbacks, I deem that studying the past and concentrating on the present issues at the same time will improve the situations.

半夏的结尾写的灰常滴好，学习。但是我觉得整篇文章有的句子实在是太长了~~ 红色的是我觉得有问题的，蓝色的是写的灰常好滴

半夏之北UID: 2517498

Do you agree or disagree that improving schools is the most factor in successful development of country.
修改过的：

In the modern society, education is one of the most attractive topics for people to discuss. Recently, according to the local media, a new debate about education begins. The issue of whether improving schools is the most factor in successful development of country. Someone who agrees with this opinion believes that improving schools can cultivate more talents for society. However, as far as I am concerned, improving schools is an important factor in facilitating a country become marvelous, but it is not the most significant one. In my opinion, the individuals themselves and public relationship are also pretty important factors.

To begin with, It’s evident that nowadays people is the key factor in improving a society. In consequence, cultivate more brilliant people will contribute to make society prosperity. Obviously, improving schools only provide some objective facilities; the most key is the students themselves. If students don't want to study, no matter how well the facilities such as libraries and laboratories the government can offer them, they still cannot become brilliant. A vivid example can be found just from one of my high school classmates. Her parents give her the best hopes. They asked the family tutor for her and provided all material which she needs to study, but she didn't like to study .Finally, she still cannot go to university. In contrast, in the retrospect to history, Edison, one of the most innovative scientists in the 21st century, he didn't have the chance to receive some well material to study, but he still became talents and makes a big contribution to society. Our surrounding abounds with examples like that.

Another significant factor is Public relationship .It’s manifest that school is only a part of one's life, but the public relationship and communication is throughout all one's life. If the government wants to educate the individuals to become talents, absolutely, public relationship is a key factor. Moreover, in modern society, what can bring us more benefit is teamwork and the bound to maintain teamwork is the public relationship. Columbus cannot get to America only by himself. With the development of technology, increasing number of tasks become complex and need to use the knowledge from many different subjects. Imagine, a physicist needs to solve a task with some chemical problem but he didn't have a good relationship with other scientists, how can he solve this problem. What’s more, a country also needs to have a good relationship with other countries which plays a key role in improving a country as the globalization is developing all the time. Typically in economy, countries need to exchange goods to get what they want. For example, China exchanges clothes and daily necessities for iron from Australia.

Admittedly, improving schools will enable a country become successful. As if more advanced facilities can be offered to students, they will have a chance to receive a better education which will enhance the possibility that they will become talents. Through the Hope Project in China, more and more students can go to schools which will benefit their hometown.

Judging from all evidence offered, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that improving schools is not the most significant factor. Though the advantages that improving schools leads to are considerable, it doesn't take the individuals themselves and the public relationship into consideration.