- 最后登录
- 2021-2-22
- 在线时间
- 4673 小时
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 声望
- 762
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 阅读权限
- 50
- 帖子
- 907
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 6161
- UID
- 2565872
 
- 声望
- 762
- 寄托币
- 12296
- 注册时间
- 2008-10-30
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 907
|
According to the local media (Where exactly is YOUR 'local'? XD), nowadays many defects but in advertisements these products look really effective have been disclosed (I'm basically not getting this sentence at all. It seems to be a random assemble of two sentences: 'nowadays many defects have been disclosed' and 'in advertisements these products look really effective'.). As a result, the issue whether advertisements can make products seem better than they are sparks a heated discussion. Someone who objects to this opinion believes that people have already known that producers will use some methods to make their products look better, so they don’t believe them. Nonetheless, as far as I am concerned, I agree with this statement because of the advanced technology and the effect of famous super stars.
To begin with, with the development of technology, increasing numbers of methods can be used to make their (Whose?) products look better in the advertisements. In the modern society, the most frequent way by which we can see the advertisements is through television, in which we can't see the products by ourselves. In consequence, it provides the producers a chance to hide the defects with some special technology (This seems to imply that if you're able to see the actual products by yourselves, you'll be able to see the defects - I would pretty much doubt this. It'd be safer to say that TV ads make it HARDER to see defects.). Cite my own experience as an example. When I was at in high school, there were many whelks (You probably got this word through some online dictionary - but this is a medical term. The common meaning of 'whelk' is the edible French snail. The common word for that condition on your face is 'pimple', or 'acne'.) on my face and I needed to find a way to make them disappear. One day, I just saw some advertisements on the television which were introducing a product to solve this problem; they showed two pictures to display the effect of their products. When I saw this (If you used 'advertisements', then be consistent with the plural forms.), I really believed their products were effective in this field, but actually, it (Again, you were using 'products'.) was not. They just used the technology--Photoshop to make the consumers believe them. Our society abounds with these examples as the media can offer an opportunity for producers to use the advertisements to hide the defects (That example you gave is not really about a 'defect', which normally refers to a mechnical or electrical glitch. The kind of advertisements you have cited should be said to 'exaggerate their products' effectiveness' rather than to 'hide defects'.).
Furthermore, nowadays, clearly, (When you have three single words separated by commas, it's often a sign of an unorganized sentence.) the effect of super stars in the advertisements is pretty common. Many people, especially teenagers, are just going after their idols especially teenagers. It is obviously that super stars have a deep influence on people in the society. Precisely, their actions and words have the power which can to lead people to do something. When they use some products or say that some brands or products are effective, most people will believe that and have the same opinion with them. According to the statistics, the research (Which statistics and which research? Even if you do want to put in fake data, at least cite some reasonable sources.) shows that super stars can facilitate the producers (I finally realized that you have been using 'producers' to mean 'manufacturers'.) to sell more products, namely 30% (So every single product's sale will go up exactly 30% under the influence of a super star? That's the kind of fake data that is too generalized to be true.). A vivid example can be found from a brand of sugar (You could at least say '..a brand of sugar in my country', so that your example's validity is not floating in the thin air. Again, fake data and fake examples are extremely easy to detect for a seasoned reader: they tend to be very repetitive and do not provide many details other than those that are directly related to the topic in discussion, and whatever details they do provide tend to be very obscure.) : after they hire a super star to represent their products, an increasing number people start to consume their products as consumers think their products are of with better quality.
Admittedly, the individuals (Who?) have already known that some methods in advertisements and cheated by some producers (This is not a complete sentence.). For instance, nowadays, just few people will believe what they see from the contrast photos? as they have already known the Photoshop. Some lies will make the consumers cannot believe them and don't not think their products are better than others. (Such uses of negatives on verbs are very awkward to read. You should use direct negative verbs like 'distrust', or move the negative away from the verb like 'think their products are not better than others', as much as possible.)
Judging from all evidences offered, we may safely arrive at a conclusion that advertisements can make their products look better. Moreover, I deem that the producers should improve the quality of their products and use some advertisements to promote sales at the same time, which can finally increase their sales for a long time. (The question is not asking you about how to increase sales 'for a long time'. I understand you're trying to 升华, but to think that 升华 will make your essay appear deeper and more mature is a misconcept, because you'll never have the time or space to elaborate on your 升华 and illustrate your point well. An unillustrated and hurried point is no point at all, therefore this 升华 effectively amounts to nothing. Instead, it shows that you have no firm grasp on the actual question.)
总结:
这位童鞋你的语法,尤其是句法,要好好注意一下。句子写得很散,而且词序的使用非常中式,请多考虑句子的组织以提高流畅度。另外一个就是举例方面,考官一般不会管你的例子真假,但假例子因为有时它的问题不是假,是空,在内容上如果和你的topic没有太大的区别,在语言能力方面会让你受到限制。具体说就是像第二个论点(Furthermore那段)的那种,你翻来覆去就是在说product, sell, super star,前面论述的关键字是这些,例子的关键字还是这些,所以一看就是空例子,效果和没有例子一样。。其实如果题目没有特别叫你use specific examples的话,你索性连例子都可以不举的,这样的空例子举起来的效果还不如不举。所以就是要注意让自己的文章要一直言之有物。 |
|