- 最后登录
- 2012-9-14
- 在线时间
- 26 小时
- 寄托币
- 156
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-3
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 4
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 90
- UID
- 2676637

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 156
- 注册时间
- 2009-8-3
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 4
|
TOPIC: ARGUMENT237 - The following appeared as part of an article in a local Beauville newspaper.
"According to a government report, last year the city of Dillton reduced its corporate tax rate by 15 percent; at the same time, it began offering relocation grants and favorable rates on city utilities to any company that would relocate to Dillton. Within 18 months, two manufacturing companies moved to Dillton, where they employ a total of 300 people. Therefore, the fastest way for Beauville to stimulate economic development and hence reduce unemployment is to provide tax incentives and other financial inducements that encourage private companies to relocate here."
WORDS: 455
TIME: 00:40:00
DATE: 2010-3-2 15:27:44
In the article of local Breauville newspaper, the author aims to convince us that Breauville should promote the tax incentives in order to stimulate economic development and thus reduce unemployment. To support his/her recommendation, a similar and successful example of the city Dillton is attached to the article. The recommendation seems advisable, however, after scrutinizing it, several critical flaws can be found to undermine the lines of reasoning when the author tries to prove it.
In the first place, the author unfairly attribute the heating economics and reducing unemployment to these new incentives that taken place in the city of Dillton. There should be many factors that may influence the economics and the job market such as some certain holidays and the construction of a new airport, the corporate tax is not the only nor demanding factor that will not firmly decide how the development of economics would be. The author demonstrate that two companies have moved into the city after these incentives take effect aiming to certify that the new principle works perfectively, nevertheless, he is not succeed in doing so. The two companies do not certainly means a raise in number, it may be more years before, so from my consideration, no compares no judgments. Although it is really a boom in the number of companies, the evidence cited in the article also shows that 300 people is employed, which can not be a tremendous improvement in certain big city as New York. Unless these possibilities are proved unreasonable, it is still vague for us to convince the assumption.
Secondly, the author commits the fallacy of false analogy. In the article, he/she believes that Breauville city can be compared with Dillton in all aspects while no substantial evidence is given in the article. As discussed above, many factors will influence the effect of these incentives, maybe the problems lay in Breauville are not the high tax but the environment, the level of education, and so forth. Without taking these factors into consideration, the conclusion is unreliable.
Finally, no evidence shows that Breauville city is suffered in a glooming economics and low employment. Even so, the author fails to consider the cost of such incentives is affordable and acceptable, or may it exist a better solution to the problems that will provide a win-win situation. After such consideration, we can conclude that the suggestion can be advisable and suitable to Breauville.
In sum, the recommendation rests on certain unreliable assumptions that render it unconvincing as it stands. To rectify these flaws, the author should provide more evidence to illustrate why the experience of Dillton can apply to Breaucille city and whether exist other alternatives that may also result in the improvements with lower cost. |
|