[Big Fish]ISSUE69 by-bobbiezz

BobbieZZUID: 2756583

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
=====================================================================

Should government pay attention on the research and development that not clearly in the human-beings further? The statement states opposing opinion. I agree with the statement in one side that if the research could be useless for public, the government should pay their inadequate goods and materials and even focus on the immediate event. Moreover, they can not only focus on reality, but subsidize to several science are have advantage to our offspring.

Firstly, government should solve the emergency at first time, such as H1N1, one kind of disease of cold but can claim people's lives. If countries also sponsor more scientists and money on the research about further, it could be worse than this situation. When public faced the emergency incident could hurt their lives and property, the leadership should follow closely on that at once. It can be also proof in the earthquake in Chile, when local people were damaged in the terrible disaster; the United Nations gave their hand to location at first time. People could feel warm and sprits from other ones.

Furthermore, sometimes pay much treasure on unclearly regions could be waste money and scientist in new technologies. Several scientists research their scholar work just indoor, they pay no attention to reality so that their work be proof have few useless for human beings both nowadays and futurity. Assets have wasted in those areas. In addition, if scientists would like to do some research on new-technologies, which can be harm for present and our later periods, it would be the worst things for all around world. So I disagree with some research like fire and bomb and another war vehicle. For world peace government should not pay more attention on implement of war.

However, not all restrictions on scientific development can not be placed, most promise and hopeful scientific knowledge, people could not realize their advantages, nevertheless, after a few year later, those truth could be proved open to the public. The space technologies, now we could not found it has utility for ourselves, however, if people do more deeply and widely thought. The advantages of it could be point out. Nowadays the earth has too large amount of people that share limit sources and the number of progeny are increasing everyday. Perhaps after hundreds year, the resources of earth such as patron, water, forest may be used end. So our government tries to find out the best way to solve the problem, the space sciences is one of the solving way. Although we could not see the clearly results in present time, public should support the scientific research.

In sum up, government should pay their narrow sources on the most useful belongings. The immediate public event ought to be focus on at first. In addition, for the later period development, the scientific should be also contributed to in some vista respects. The other restrictions and harmful sciences should not be support in more assets.

rokre2ttUID: 2714355

TOPIC: ISSUE69 - "Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
=====================================================================

Should government pay attention on the research and development that not clearly in the human-beings further? The statement states opposing opinion. I agree with the statement in one side that if the research could be useless for public, the government should pay their inadequate goods and materials and even focus on the immediate event. Moreover, they can not only focus on reality, but subsidize to several science are have advantage to our offspring.

Firstly, government should solve the emergency at first time, such as H1N1, one kind of disease of cold（对H1N1,flu更准一点吧） but can claim people's lives. If countries also sponsor more scientists and money on the research about further, it could be worse than this situation. When public faced the emergency incident could hurt their lives and property, the leadership should follow closely on that at once. It can be also proof in the earthquake in Chile, when local people were damaged in the terrible disaster; the United Nations gave their hand to location at first time. People could feel warm and sprits from other ones.

Furthermore, sometimes pay much treasure (many treasures) on unclearly regions could be waste (wasting) money and scientist in new technologies. Several scientists research their scholar work just indoor, they pay no attention to reality so that their work be proof（proved） have few useless for human beings both nowadays and futurity. Assets have (been)wasted in those areas. In addition, if scientists would like to do some research on new-technologies, which can be harm for present and our later periods, it would be the worst things for all around world. So I disagree with some research like fire and bomb and another war vehicle(tool). For world peace government should not pay more attention on implement of war.

However, not all restrictions on scientific development can not(是can吧) be placed, most promise and hopeful scientific knowledge, people could not realize their advantages, nevertheless, after a few year later, those truth could be proved open to the public. The space technologies, now we could not found it has utility for ourselves, however, if people do more deeply and widely thought. The advantages of it could be point(ed) out. Nowadays the earth has too large amount of people that share limit sources and the number of progeny are increasing everyday. Perhaps after hundreds (of)year(s), the resources of earth such as patron, water, forest may be used end(换成up). So our government tries to find out the best way to solve the problem, the space sciences is one of the solving way. Although we could not see the clearly results in present time, public should support the scientific research.

In sum up, government should pay their narrow sources on the most useful belongings. The immediate public event ought to be focus on at first. In addition, for the later period development, the scientific should be also contributed to in some vista respects. The other restrictions and harmful sciences should not be support in more assets.

感觉好像前三段一直在说的是另一个issue题目，那个关于当前和长远利益的题，然后从第四段才开始明确到关于政府限制，似乎和题目不怎么贴合。个人感觉
文中有一些小语病， 可能是限时写有些仓促吧