issue 167 第二篇习作 有拍必回（虽然不咋会改）多谢了！

zpeng1024UID: 2640077

Issue 167 it is impossible for an effective political leader to tell the truth all the time. Complete honesty is not useful virtue for a politician.

The speaker alleges that complete honesty is not a useful virtue for a politican for the reason that a effective politician can not tell the truth all the time . Although usually the politician is required honesty to face the citizenry as to his or her motives and agenda, on balance i agree that a effective politician does not need complete  honesty, since the honesty is not the criterion of a successful political leader.

One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker is that a politician's job is to build, maintain, and expand the wealth, prosperity and political influence of his nation, district, country,state. This is his or her prime concern. Moreover, the criterion of a effective leader is whether or not the politician can fulfill these obligation, other than be honesty or not  We should realize that attaining those goals require them to make choices that are outside the boundary of morality. Thus, in order to gain and maintain the political leadership to severe the ultimately interests of the public, some measure of pandering the electorate and the one who can provide the financial suppotrt  is necessary, and some dishonest means to fulfill the politician's job is permissible.

Another reason for my agreement lies in the fact that the complete honesty is not effective at all in politics , in addition, nobody can be honest to any individual if he is viewed as a politician. In the first place, consider, for instance, if the president Bush would be honest to answer how the US get the information as well as the army's strategies to deal with the terrorists who plotted the 9.11 terror, it will surely fail. In the second place, a politician must be loyalty to the stages or the country which he or she representatives, and if the politician always be honest to the other stages or the country, it is doubtful whether he or she can be elected by his electorate.

Have recognized that the inherent nature of politics asks for a certain amount of dishonesty, however this dishonesty may lies in the means and process to the ultimate goal, it is no doubt that legitimate political leadership requires honest with the citizenry as to the leader's motives and agenda. In other words, moral leaders think in terms of a obligation approach to honesty, while the political leader thinks in terms of consequence or a utilitarian approaches to honesty. For example, dealing with the economical crisis in 2008, China put four thousand billion RMB to boost the market, the politician should be honest to tell how the four billiion was distributed.

In conclusion, dishonest is often necessary to gain the political power and to sever the interests of the public given that the inherent nature of politics.
And be honest or not is indeed not the criterion of a effective leader. However, in any democratic society a politician should be honest to tell the citizenry his political motives and goals, otherwise he would ultimately forfeit his leadership.   
提纲：1 政治家的作用
2 如果彻底诚实带来的后果
3 在某些地方例如施政的目的和动机方面要诚实   

123runfordreamUID: 2697608

Issue 167 it is impossible for an effective political leader to tell the truth all the time. Complete honesty is not useful
virtue for a politician.

The speaker alleges that complete honesty is not a useful virtue for a politican for the reason that a effective politician can not tell the truth all the time . Although usually the politician is required honesty to face the citizenry as to his or her motives and agenda, on balance i agree that a effective politician does not need complete  honesty, since the honesty is not the criterion of a successful political leader.(since后面把你本身要表达的观点扭曲了。是complete honesty or the honesty？)

One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker is that a politician's job is to build, maintain, and expand the wealth（maintain wealth?三思…）, prosperity and political influence (？这个太抽象了吧。政治影响力的目的又是什么？) of his nation, district, country, state. (这个观点我持保留意见。说的比较抽象。概括的说其实领导人的作用就是协助维持社会秩序，帮助提高地区或者国家的经济，这本身已经很概括了，你仅从财富方面来讲更狭小了一点。个人觉得举出的例子最好能跟你下文可能出现的某些没有办法诚实公布给公民的例子靠近。)This is his or her prime concern. Moreover, the criterion of a effective leader is whether or not the politician can fulfill these obligation, other than be honesty or not  We should realize that attaining those goals require them to make choices that are outside the boundary of morality.(those goals 都会触犯到morality的底线吗？) Thus, in order to gain and maintain the political leadership to severe the ultimately interests （语法错误！）of the public, some measure (可数名词)of pandering the electorate and the one who can provide thefinancial suppotrt  is necessary, and some dishonest means to fulfill the politician's job is permissible.

Another reason for my agreement lies in the fact that the complete honesty is not effective at all in politics , in addition, (这个词组这样用还有待我的确认) nobody can be honest to any individual if he is viewed as a politician. In the first place, consider, for instance, if the president Bush would be honest to answer how the US get the information as well as the army's strategies to deal with the terrorists who plotted the 9.11 terror, it will surely fail. In the second place, a politician must be loyalty to the stages or the country which he or she representatives, and if the politician always be honest to the other stages or the country, it is doubtful whether he or she can be elected by his electorate.

Have recognized that the inherent nature of politics asks for a certain amount of dishonesty, (语法错误)however this dishonesty may lies in the means and process to the ultimate goal, it is no doubt that legitimate political leadership requires honest with the citizenry as to the leader's motives and agenda. In other words, moral leaders think in terms of a (冠词！！) obligation approach to honesty, while the political leader thinks in terms of consequence or a utilitarian approaches to honesty. For example, dealing with the economical crisis in 2008, China put four thousand billion RMB to boost the market, the politician should be honest to tell how the four billiion was distributed.(这个例子可以继续拓展，深入。比如这笔钱的去处公开的好处以及不公开可能引起的问题。)

In conclusion, dishonest is often necessary to gain the political power and to sever the interests of the public given that the inherent nature of politics.
And be honest or not is indeed not the criterion of a effective leader. However, in any democratic society a politician should be honest to tell the citizenry his political motives and goals, otherwise he would ultimately forfeit his leadership.   
提纲：1 政治家的作用
2 如果彻底诚实带来的后果
3 在某些地方例如施政的目的和动机方面要诚实

先说说你整篇文章可以避免的是问题，小到冠词副词的使用，大到句子的语法问题都必须先解决。其次你的行文不够严谨。开头提出你对观点的认同，但随后的解释逻辑比较混乱。我能建议你可以思考的这些问题你也提及了——1，完全诚实的利弊。2，在哪些问题上必须完全诚实哪些不能够这么做？为什么？——不过主线不够有力道。这跟你提纲中的第一点是有关系的。政治家的作用和后两者的表述联系不够紧密！例子方面我个人觉得说服力可以再提升。这些仅是我的小建议。加油~~

zpeng1024UID: 2640077

2# 123runfordream
刚看到，多谢多谢了，仔细研究之