- 最后登录
- 2011-9-8
- 在线时间
- 48 小时
- 寄托币
- 248
- 声望
- 16
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-12
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 163
- UID
- 2764249

- 声望
- 16
- 寄托币
- 248
- 注册时间
- 2010-2-12
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
本帖最后由 carol.lj 于 2010-4-21 08:42 编辑
改xmaszzt的
What kind of society we are striving for – more technical, more sustainable, or more harmonious- determines what kind of education we take on children who determine the destiny of society, as the dual claims provides by the author, the better socialized education has a close relationship with the better society that I fundamentally agree . So, if we have not learn how to rise children bring about a better society, what skills the children grasps by the education at present, and if the education was socialized, whether we will have a better society.[对题目做出回应,基本上赞成作者观点]
Recognized that the education is not equal to the schools, which really is the main body of the current education system. The schools, teaching the knowledge, at the same time it imitate a environment which is related to society but not really the society, in this environment, children learn some social rules to regulate their behaviors, face their challenges and resolve them during the period of(删,adolescence就青春期的意思啊) adolescence, and in this environment, children learn some basic social skills to deal with their friends, such as cooperation, compromise, acceptance and negotiation. So we can see that the purpose of the schools which gathering the children is to let our later generations adapt this society. Though the educators realize teaching
(加上plays a key role to)
is(is 去掉) merge the knowledge and the society, the ‘under-socialized’ schools is(are) not enough (添个to be constructed), as the competing pressure is stifling to model children, the standard of good or bed(bad) in school mostly focus on how is the knowledge mastered in some parts in the world for example.(这个改成陈述的语气)[这段主要讲了学校是教育体系的主体,它对孩子青春期成长有很多积极的影响,孩子青春期社会化的一个过程]
Let us change our mind[上面的结尾处说好坏的标准取决于知识在世界的一些部分中怎么被撑握,将要举例说明。但这里没有例证,感觉缺点什么] what is the effect if we make the main body of education which is the society itself? On one hand, the education should open to the society.(尽量避免用should吧) Except necessary examines, schools should support all students more opportunities to learn how to live in society and tell from right values from wrong one, more constructive, schools can offer some chance to the children such as part-time jobs, or volunteers in public sites, liking libraries, parks, and other sites which will be a valuable experience to shorten the distance between schools and society. On the other hand, the whole society should shoulder the obligations of education. Schools, families, and other public places would all play the roles to raise the children to bring a better society. This sounds frothy but it worth to win over. Maybe the families, the schools, the environment children lived in will form a network of education and everyone has a positive guided attitudes when he face a child[当面对一个孩子的时候,每个人都有一个积极有向导的态度,说啥,读不懂。。][这段开头就提出分论题:如果教育的主体是社会本身,将有哪些效果呢?大部分讲的还是学校,与第二段差不多,是不是有点重复了??]
To all, I am not worried about that if the education was socialized, we can not get the better society. We have already socialized the education for a long time, and this proved to be correct. If it says we never get a better society only by socializing the education, but this way will always be good to the children, so and the society.[教育的社会化是社会发展的动力,呼应开头]
结构上,文章的思路是这样的:
1.同意作者的观点,教育的社会化与社会的命运有关
2.孩子青春期社会化的一个过程
3.学校和社会对孩子的的社会化
4.总结,呼应开头
可以看出第二段与第三段重复了,第一段中定义了一个更好的社会,但下文很少很少说到教育社会化的程度对建设一个更好的社会有什么影响,怎么个影响法。如果加上这些,内容上也会充实些。
在说理的过程中缺乏一些例证,以后要多积累点素材咯~~
不管是语言本身,还是语言的逻辑上,我很难找出些错误(唉,平时我作文的语言上就蛮多问题了)….再琢磨琢磨了…
|
|