Definitely, a victory 小组第3次作业 argument188 by 9号wdx1986

wdx19861106UID: 2821198

Argument188：
A new report suggests that men and women experience pain very differently from one another, and that doctors should consider these differences when prescribing pain medications. When researchers administered the same dosage of kappa opioids-a painkiller-to 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted, the women reported feeling much less pain than the men, and the easing of pain lasted considerably longer in women. This research suggests that kappa opioids should be prescribed for women whenever pain medication is required, whereas men should be given other kinds of pain medication. In addition, researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women.

提纲：
1、试验中，怎么定义疼痛的程度？个人感觉？还是有设备检测？每个人的心里身体素质不同，那么对疼痛的感觉不尽相同。通过实验说明男女对疼痛的感受不同。但是我们需要知道这种不同的原因。因为对药的不同吸收？因为身体原因？因为手术过程中的技术原因？医生水平的原因？

2、实验只测试了kappa opioids，那其他药品呢？不同的药品说不定会有不同的结果。

3、药品检测应该是药品生产厂家和质检相关部门的责任，随着技术的发展，药品种类数量大量增加，全部经由研究人员检测不合理，也许是不可能的事情。

4、实验的建议部分有问题，也许kappa opioids，这种药品质量不错，只是在实验中用药剂量不足造成的结果呢？这个结论不合理。还需进一步验证。

5、在牙科方面做的实验能代替所有的医科吗？

（只写了前三点）

This report concludes that doctors should consider the different experience about pain when prescribing pain medications. To support this conclusion the researchers tested a kind of painkillers on 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teeth extracted. Close scrutiny of the report, however, reveals logically unconvincing in several respects.

First of all, from the report we can not get the useful information about what did the researchers define about the degree of the pain. Then how can they distinguish the less pain and the pain? Do they have a criterion? If not or the pain just the feeling of the people, then it is entirely possible that different people have different feeling for the same pain, because the feeling is not only relate to physical body but also involve the psychology. So the experiment cannot rational certify the standpoint if they can’t deal with this doubt.

As for the experiment, there are 28 men and 20 women join in the test, and they used the kappa opioids on the teeth extracted, and no other information about the test. One people have said that “Detail is the key of success”. Maybe the men are all having other disease which aggravates the pain or they take something that counteracts the kappa opioids. Or the women are all healthier than the men, and this will inflect the result of the experiment. It is possible that the kappa opioids medicine is just the women-only medicine. If so, this would further undermine the report’s relevance in this respect.

Finally, the author unwarranted assumes that the researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on men versus women. As the development of technology and the theory of human body, there are more and more medications sell on the market, then it is impossible to test all kind of medicines. And I deem that the manufacturers and the Administration of Quality Supervision which have the obligation to explain detail of the pesticide effect.

In sum, the report is logically flawed and unconvincing as it stands. To bolster it the author must provide clearer evidence that men and women experience pain differently, and give rational recommendations on the medicine research.

GassaUID: 2498402

This reportconcludes that doctors should consider the different experience about pain whenprescribing pain medications. To support this conclusion the researchers testeda kind of painkillers on 28 men and 20 women who were having their wisdom teethextracted. Close scrutiny of the report, however, reveals logically unconvincingin several respects.

First of all, from the report we can notget the useful information about what did （我觉得应该用how） theresearchers define about the degree of the pain. (这句和上句意思有点重复) Then how canthey distinguish the less pain and the pain? Do they have a criterion? If notor the pain just the feeling of the people, then it is entirely possible thatdifferent people have different feeling for the same pain, because the feelingis not only relate to physical body but also involve the psychology. So theexperiment cannot rational certify the standpoint if they can’t deal with thisdoubt.


As for （这两个介词，得去掉一个） the experiment,there are 28 men and 20 women join in the test, and they used the kappa opioidson the teeth extracted, and no other information about the test. One peoplehave said that “Detail is the key of success”. Maybe the men are all havingother disease which aggravates the pain or they take something that counteractsthe kappa opioids. Or the women are all healthier than the men, and this willinflect the result of the experiment. It is possible that the kappa opioids medicineis just the women-only medicine. If so, this would further undermine the report’srelevance in this respect.

Finally, the author unwarranted assumesthat the researchers should reevaluate the effects of all medications on menversus women. As the development of technology and the theory of human body,there are more and more medications sell on the market, then it is impossibleto test all kind of medicines. And I deem that the manufacturers and theAdministration of Quality Supervision which have the obligation to explaindetail of the pesticide effect.

In sum, the report is logically flawedand unconvincing as it stands. To bolster it the author must provide clearerevidence that men and women experience pain differently, and give rationalrecommendations on the medicine research.

逻辑错误招得比较准备，我觉得要是能把语言修饰一下就更好了。