有空给你们改改ISSUE（含130分析/改完会短信通知/平均排队时间2周）

溪汐河UID: 2693863

终于等到版主的修改稿了,很开心,嘿嘿,再次感谢!

我在等待期间又把130重写了,现在看了版主帮我改的,看来我还要再修改修改.
也许是一开始就有点钻牛角尖,所以这道题是我感觉最难写的.

谢谢版主的指导!我觉得能把我写的第一篇issue看完的真的很不容易,哈哈.

sky3721UID: 2566862

50
"In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."



Nowadays, with the great development of society and explosion of information leading to unceasingly rapid change of technology, there is much controversy over the issue of whether it is better or not for the faculty to spend time doing some relevant practices outside the professionally academic world. As far as I am concerned, this is a recommendable approach to keep abreast with the era and eventually achieve a better result of the teachers' instruction. However, it is unnecessary and also unwarranted to extend this broad assertion to embrace all faculty at the college and university, especially for those who are focused on pure theoretical field. In the following discussion, I would like to present evidence to support my point of view.

To begin with, practicing outside the college accords with the purpose of education, which is to cultivate students meeting the requirement of the society. What the modern society needs most are the talents who are capable of applying their knowledge on correct respects in real world, instead of researching useless or not realizable theories. Only by practices can the faculty correctly grasp the need of the modern society, which would be more beneficial to their guidance to the students. Thus they can lead the learners to the proper direction which the society calls for.

Another great advantage of working in the practical world is to enable a better comprehension on their relevant fields.  For a majority of fields, such as marketing and business, the theories in the books are usually so stiff or even misleading that it would be vague and unreliable when solving problems in real practical world. For instance, the marketing doctrines tell us it is most profitable to make an investment with little risk based on several economic analyses. However, the profit of an investment is always influence both subjective and objective factors. Chances are that political problems or possible confliction with the local custom would cause a painful deficit. Without any practices on such business, it is hard and nearly impossible for a person to do wise decision even if he has got the full score on the theories. Therefore, it would be lucky and vitally helpful for the students if the professor has got the experience on practices.

Apart from these, experience on practical world may inspire the learners with much interest insofar as students would easily be attracted by the fresh stories about the professors' work when in face of the dull and boring theories in the books. This could render the classes easier and happier for students to accept both theories and useful experience. Furthermore, perchance the knowledge in the teaching material is generally out of date in the era of rapid development of science and technology. Working outside the academic world also makes their horizons abreast with the time and reduce the possibility of misleading instruction on the classes.

Nevertheless, I would caution that extending this broad assertion too far might risk undermining those positive objectives. For some special faculties, especially for those who are focused on the pure theoretical fields, such as advanced mathematics and philosophy, it is unnecessary or unwarranted to be employed outside the college and university. For example, hardly can we find an associated employment for a pure philosopher. Besides, an overloaded additional position may distract the faculty from the research they are fixed on. Therefore, we should call for a balance in major research and relevant work.

In the final analysis, it is advisable for most faculties in college and university to have an additional employment related to their fields. This recommendation would achieve an expected improvement on instruction. However, it is not appropriate for all faculty to conduct and we should call for a balance in major research and the attached work.


第一篇ISSUE，无限时，谢谢楼主了！

hythythytUID: 2857045

楼主我想问一个问题：在Issue破题方面，总觉得看了北美范文的逻辑后，自己的思路被限制了。写的具体例子会不一样，但基本破题思路和北美差不多。这样是不是不太妥当。谢谢！

暮野长歌UID: 2686695

劳驾前辈了~
"Students should bring a certain skepticism to whatever they study. They should question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively."

The speaker contents that students should bring a skeptical attitude in study, and should question what they are taught actively. Aside from undue skepticism, I strong agree with the speaker's broad assertion. If we always accepted the faiths passively in our study, our society would lose the power of progress.

The realm of physical sciences perhaps skepticism is the most important character for the scientists. It is well known that nothing in science is absolutely certain, a conclusion of today are always removed and replaced by a new concept of tomorrow. As a matter of fact, it is the scientists’ constantly doubt to those fixed notions that push the history of physics forward. For example, Copernicus, the science giant of the Renaissance, advanced the theory that the earth and other planets revolve around the sun, disrupting the Ptolemaic system of astronomy. In fact, the Heliocentric theory is an achievement of doubting to the authority. In other words, it is the skepticism that sets the natural science free from the theology.

Even in the traditional Chinese medicine, the experience are highly valued realm, also needs the spirit of suspicion. If doctors were all having blind faith in the traditional prescription, the Chinese medicine would not have the brilliant achievements of today. For instance, Li Shizhen, one of the greatest doctors of traditional Chinese medicine in the Chinese history, found that there were too many mistakes about the knowledge of the classic traditional medicine books and medicine concepts. Then, he determined to revise and prefect them. Through 29 years research, he finished the great medicine book - Compendium of materia medica.

Admittedly, extreme skepticism can cause inhibit learning. We can not just doubt for the purpose of doubting, this kind of skepticism only has destructiveness but without constructive criticism, proposals and remarks. The doubt must found on knowing the foundation knowledge of certain subject. A student of humanity criticizes a famous astronomer is unwarrantable. In other words, learners must have a deep understanding of the subject first. Only in this way can avoid that learners fall into the extreme skepticism's trap and make our learning more efficiency.

To sum up, except for the extreme skepticism, I concede that the speaker’s assertion is fundamentally correct. There are no perfect things in the world, the same as our cognitions. I believe our concepts and knowledge need to perfect and revise constantly, no matter which realm they are in. Thus, our society will not lose the motive force to go forward.

yc12liuliuxueUID: 2874207

这是我第一次练笔，恳请楼主批阅，望指出不足！！！谢谢！！！
ISSUE70 - "In any profession-business, politics, education, government-those in power should step down after five years. The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership."

Is it in any profession that those leaders should step down after five years, as the speaker suggests? Confronted with so difficult problem, hardly to be given a criterion, that we have to use case-by-case to analyze it carefully. On the other hand, I strongly agree with the author's assertion that the surest path to revitalize any enterprise successfully is through changing its leadership with a new one.

Admittedly, in the political realm, almost every country, community and any institution has its period, which is mostly five years, to elect a leadership again. In my view, this measure works very well. It is universally known that a person in power will have many privileges to accept some extra or even illegal profits. For example, Chen Shuibian, the so called "president" of Taiwan, once succeeded win the twice election by some despicable ploys in the year of 2004.Just because he had been in power for such a long time, he appropriated a great deal of money, the number of which is approximately equal to 23,000,000 dollars, from the government account. Besides, some relatives of his, especially his wife and sons, have important jobs in his government, and even immigrated to Canada, America and other western developed countries because of his privileges.

Nonetheless, the method may be not useful in the economic domain. Whether those in power should step down from the leadership after five years is contingent on how well they do in managing the whole enterprise. Obviously, the savvy and shrewd leader must be hired for another five years while the one who performs badly should be fired. During the recently global financial crisis, a lot of CEOs have been dismissed for their incompetence to protect their companies from the crisis, leading a mass of deficit to their enterprises. Among these leaderships, there is no lack of leaders who is well-informed and did perform well once before the global financial crisis and some leaders who had worked for their companies for more than five years, even over ten years. Therefore, the outstanding achievement is the guarantee to be praised and maintained for a leadership; otherwise, the company has to choose to terminate the contact with him.

What's more, changing leadership dose not necessarily result in success for a company. We can not deny that a leader who performs badly and leads his or her company to a worse condition should be replaced by a new one. However, if the one in power manages well and brings enough opportunities to help his company become more competitive and seize much more shares of market, it will be a foolish decision to make him step down and promote a new one in who nobody can immediately believe. Because no one knows to which place the new one in power will lead the enterprise. Further more, those who led enterprise effectively are more experienced and familiar with the condition where the companies stand, and they can understand how to organize well better than new leaders. Therefore, the well done leaders should be given several more years to manage their companies rather than replaced by some new leaders, especially who are unfamiliar with the organizations.

To sum up, we have to accede that in some professions, especially politics and government, leaders should step down after five years. However, in other professions, such as economic, there is no need changing the well-performed leaders with new ones. In addition, it is unwarranted to assert that through new leadership any enterprise will revitalize successfully.

mingpjUID: 2716886

1# sinbad_28
版主你好啊~~~
这是我 的第一篇 写的很艰辛 定了3个小时我都没写完 估计用了5个小时吧
之后 考到WORD 上面写完的 考到word发现能够后发现全是单词拼写有问题  （泪奔~~~！！）
希望你看看吧~~~  我自己修改时觉得真没什么可取的地方
没办法 我 9月7号考试  我刚实习回来 一个多月的实习 没给我多少时间来准备~~
谢谢了
TOPIC: ISSUE130 - "How children are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help bring about a better society."
WORDS: 422
TIME: 03:00:00
DATE: 2010/8/20 17:09:21

The speaker's tow claims, in my view, are assertive, that the destiny of society is dominated by socialization of children is more or less overstated and else that we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help about a better society seems go against our experience.
Turely, socialization of children really plays a crucial role in the destiny of society. Because the children can give the society a better future digested and assimilated knowledge such as creativity and expertise and virtue which helps them distinguish good and evil. Moreover, they will transmit democratic values, create equality of opportunities and prepare next new generations of citizen in society.
However, there also are dozens of important factors influence on the destiny of society. For instance nuclear weapon, which still threats our peace, global warming, that directly cause the polar ice astoundingly melt so that Hong Kong and New York will under sea in 2050,as well as energy crisis, also can lead energy war to the undeveloped countries who are abundant of petroleum. So, after all, socialization of children seems is a minor factor when compared with above all.
Moreover, some famous persons are not socialized well in their childhood but they still contribute a lot to the society. Paragons, such as Helen Keller ,comes immediately in my mind ,who was an author, political and lecture, was the first deaf-blind person to earn a Bachelor of Art degree. But as we know, in her childhood days she suffered from deaf and blind, couldn't be socialized well, she had to know something through the dramatic depiction of the play and film. When she grew up, she was a prolific author and was outspoken to against war, spoken for women's suffrage, workers’ rights, socialism as well as many other progressive causes.
And, consider about the speaker's another point which seems to be a little bit ridiculous. We government pay great attention on education, give enough finance to promote the facilities and teaching resource, increase the enrollment without any charge of tuition so that children are provided a ideal environment to study and academic research. We parents hope their children will amount to anything, they would send him to the best schools, teach children to read books after school hours, encourage children to contact with peers, suggest that they learn to wage their own independent. As a result, compared to previous generations, contemporary youth make much more academic achievements and major breakthroughs in the realm of science. In short, government, school, parents have enough experience of child education. So the second claim must face challenge of the experience, as I see it.
In sum, children’ socialization have numerous effects on the destiny of society, but not dominantly. Absolutely, we have profound experience on children education. So I fundamentally vote against the two aspect of claimer’ points.

Shuang777UID: 2850011

明天就考了，今天才发现楼主的分析...泪奔...不过多亏还是看到了，多谢~