Issue48【六人行小组7.26】by 包

thisisyishuUID: 2586842

ISSUE48 - "The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."
WORDS: 420
TIME: 0:45:00


I agree with the speaker's broad assertion that the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten rather than the famous few. However the speaker unnecessarily extends the assertion that the study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. In my opinion, place emphasis on individuals is an effective way to study history, we can pay more attention on groups of people but the attention on famous few is still important.

I turn first to my chief point of agreement with the statement. For example, in a war, numberless of soldiers devotes their life, when the war is finally over, most of their names would be forgotten, and people can only remember the few commanders of the winner. 405000 United States soldiers died in world war II，most of their names have fade out as time past. In fact, without the sacrifice of the soldiers, no commander can win the war by his own effort. In this case we can say the significant events and trends in the war were made by the identities have long been forgotten.

However, even if the forgotten majority is very important, it is not likely possible to study the history through study each person of the group one by one. It will consume much time and many of their experience are very similar. We can learn much details of the hole event by studying each soldier, but they are just fragments, When it comes to a clear vision of how the story happened and effect on contemporary life, we must to study the few administrators who experienced the whole process and make decision about the very single step which decide the trend of it. There is a suitable example to support this point. When we study the 8 years war between China and Japan which began 1937, we must first study Mao's spirits, It's he lead Chinese people to win the war, and his book clearly show us how he deal with each war situation and his dominant idea which led him made decisions and finally effected on the whole war progress. Some of these ideas are still give us great help to deal with the complex situation in the society.

When it comes to the arts aspect, it’s true that no artist can beyond time, the artist's skill and style always affected by the historical limitation. In a sense, art is the consequence of Zeitgeist, the spirit of the times. But the value between a master and a painter is totally different, if you want learn the sprit of art, you must study the best. You can learn the spirit of Renaissance Art trough learning Michelangelo’s work. You can approach the core thought of Pop art by studying Andy Warhol’s art practice.


In sum, we should give more attention on groups of people because they are an indispensable part and a significant impetus of historical tend. While famous few is a insightful clue to understand history.



138"Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress."

------------------------------
不同意。Only太绝对。Mistakes要以平常心对待。
1 可能是discovery 和progress过程中不能回避的一部分，但是错误不是获取成功的唯一途径，过分相信该论点，将错误看成必由之路。会造成精力的浪费，使我们离成功更远。
我们没有无限的时间和精力
有的事情只能做一次，危险性。诺贝尔的兄弟死于实验，生命宝贵
时机性，百年一遇的天文现象，观测不到就错过了
2个人因素，要善于从失败中取得教训，及时纠正前进方向。有的人会犯同一个错误。那些给人带来成功的错误并不是偶然的，也是努力积累到一定程度的结果。比如说盘尼西林的发现。这些努力的出发点都是成功，绝不是mistake。所以我们不能一开始就想mistake遇到了不怕就行。
3 其他因素也能指引成功的方向，严谨的研究态度，扎实的基础，甚至一些运气
都是成功的要素
所以 mistakes虽然是成功路上无法忽视的一步，但绝不是成功的唯一因素

NO.112
教育

"Some educational systems emphasize the development of students' capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, but students would benefit more from an education on that also taught them to explore their own emotions."
一些教育机构强调培养学生的推理和逻辑思考能力，但是学生从教他们如何培养个人情操的教育系统中获益更多。

同意 explore their own emotions 能帮助他们形成完善的人格，对长远发展有重大意义
1能掌控emotion的人更容易成功
A 保持良好的状态与心态是工作顺利进行的保证。贝聿铭情商很高。他风度翩翩地周旋于社会各界人士之间，获得了很多项目
B 控制不了自己的心态长时间处于压抑状态就算挣很多钱也没用
2没有好心态害人害己
马加爵没有健全的心态
纳什的精神问题浪费了不少天才
所以explore their own emotions是重要的基石，在这方面得到充分培养的人，比单纯学术水平高的人更容易拥有幸福的人生和成功的事业

160"The most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little."

------------------------------
fundamentally同意
但是要避免走极端
1自信独立地作判断是成功领袖的必备素质
舆论来自于各个利益团体
通常是片面的
Chairman Mao的前期，抵制左倾，各种新对策，不拘一格打败米帝
2 刚愎自用导致失败
文化大革命

邓改革开放
所以，容易受人影响的领导不容易成就大事业，但是不听别人意见的人更容易带来灾难


26"Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."

------------------------------
同意，但是也可以寻求两者的共存
1单纯保留旧建筑而忽略新发展，保留下来的只能是死去的建筑。
建筑和城市都是会新陈代谢，拥有自己生命周期的
中国日本等亚洲习惯使用木结构，本来就是认为建筑不是永固的。例
伊势神宫的定期重建
2 要积极发展新建筑
适应时代需求，并引领人们追求新的生活方式
旧的建筑从空间结构
美学上都难以满足需求
时代精神与建筑
现代主义——后现代主义——现代的参数化设计
都有其深刻的历史文化根源，其大潮是不可阻挡的
3 发展新经济能为保留精华提供物质保障
4 我们还可以寻找永续发展的共存之道
如保留旧建筑，寻找新功能。赋予新含意

Eileen312UID: 2648750

I agree with the speaker's broad assertion that the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten rather than the famous few. However the speaker unnecessarily extends the assertion that the study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. In my opinion, place emphasis on individuals is an effective way to study history, we can pay more attention on groups of people but the attention on famous few is still important. [开头条理清晰，赞！]
I turn first to my chief point of agreement with the statement[statement前面加个限制，或者后面加从句说明一下][这个地方还是要说一下你的观点的，不能仅仅说“我所支持的那样”就完了]. For example, in a war [in war], numberless of [of去,掉numberless本身是adj.]soldiers devotes their life[lives], [改为“.”]when the war is finally over, most of their names would be forgotten, and people can only remember the few commanders of the winner. 405000 United States soldiers died in world war II，most of their names have fade[faded] out as time past[pasts][这个例子很好！]. In fact, without the sacrifice of the soldiers, no commander can win the war by his own effort. In this case we can say[see?] the significant events and trends in the war were made by the identities have long been forgotten. [按照你的逻辑，这一段是要支持：the most significant events and trends in history were made possible by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten rather than the famous few。单纯的这样一个例子说明不了多少问题啊，没说明commanders没做贡献啊，很明显的壁纸不谈，说服力不大]
However, even if the forgotten majority is very important, it is not likely possible to study the history through study each person of the group one by one. It will consume much time and many of their experience are very similar. We can learn much details of the [w]hole event by studying each soldier, but they are just fragments,[“.”] When it comes to a clear vision of how the story happened and effect [effected?] on [effect是Vt.,不用on] contemporary life, we must to[no “to”] study the few administrators who experienced the whole process and make[made] decision about the very single step which decide[decided] the trend of it[指代不明]. There is a[an] suitable example to support this point. When we study the 8 years[’] war between China and Japan which began 1937, we must first study Mao's spirits,[.] It's[It is] he lead[who led] Chinese people to win the war, and his book clearly show us how he deal[dealt] with each war situation[chinglish] and his dominant idea which led him made[to make] decisions and finally effected on the whole war progress[chinglish]. Some of these ideas are still give [giving] us great help to deal with the complex situation in the society.[混乱。。。]
When it comes to the arts aspect, it’s true that no artist can beyond time[chinglish again! “outdate”], [and]the artist's skill and style [is]always affected by the historical limitation[艺术不过时+历史局限性？？矛盾]. In a sense, art is the consequence of Zeitgeist, [that is] the spirit of the times[没有the]. But the value between a master and a painter[master可以是任何领域的专家，不可以和painter并列] is totally different,[.] if you want [to]learn the sprit[spirit] of art, you must study the best. You can learn the spirit of Renaissance Art trough learning Michelangelo’s work. You can approach the core thought of Pop art by studying Andy Warhol’s art practice. [这段很罗嗦，主题不清；前面没有限定领域这里怎么出来了When it comes to the arts aspect,]

In sum, we should give more attention on groups of people because they are an indispensable part and a significant impetus of historical tend. While famous few is a insightful clue to understand history.[最后一句有用么？？似乎没说完。。。]
[2、是大众的力量，不是名人的力量
3、不能意义研究群众个体，应该研究名人
4、艺术领域，学真知找向大师
这是你的主体段，根本没有逻辑嘛。。。不过第一段很完美，中间的几个例子也不错。45min能写成这样，很不错了。继续加油啊O(∩_∩)O~]