跟风写Issue17，法律的公平和不公平问题，欢迎拍砖，有拍必回~

joyce==UID: 2857353

题目："There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."
有两种法律：公正的和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律， 但是更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。



I concede with the statement that each individual has the responsibility to obey just laws, but in terms of whether laws can be classified into two types, the just and the unjust, and the assertion that individuals should disobey and resist unjust laws, I have reservations about this point of view due to several reasons.

Admittedly, it is difficult for legislators to take every situation into account, hence laws which are injustice is unavoidable. Moreover, there is a long process since the acts are introduced and they are widely applicated in practical life by the public. During this process, new problems may arise, which obviously cannot be foreseen by the legislators. Euthanasia, for example, is a controversial issue over which people debate for years, the fact that killing people is forbidden by laws and the reception in ethics and morals that euthanasia can extenuate patients’ affliction is always a collision. But when acts on killing people were introduced, euthanasia did not even arise. Therefore, if legislators knew there will be a conflict between morality and laws over this issue, they may consider it twice whether killing people should be judged as illegitimate.

Furthermore, People's judgment on whether a specific law is just or not depends on their values and outlooks. As a result, there is no absolute criterion to justify which laws are just while others are unjust, since the criterion of justice and injustice is identical for each person. For example, when legislators in southern states of the U.S. carried out the apartheid acts in the nineteenth century, they were panegyrized by white people who have the conception bred in the bone that the black are lazy, imbecile and violent; while for the Africans they undoubtedly mean unequal treatment and discrimination, because due to these acts they lose the equal rights to employment, education, expression of political opinion and so on. For this reason, the relative justness of a law is closely in correlation with the social roles each individual plays, and interests the mainstream occupies in the law.

In the second place, the original intention of a law's legislation is to maintain an 'order' which every individual obeys so that the society can function stably. If anyone only chooses the laws they appreciate to obey and disobey or even resist laws which are viewed as 'unjust' in their criterion, turmoil will inevitably erupt. For instance, people in favor of possessing guns will be encouraged to buy firearms; those who are in opposition to forbidding drug merchandising will sell drugs overtly in public places; and an even more serious situation, criminals think that constraint, a deprivation of their personal freedom, is apparently unjust for themselves and consequently they may choose to break jail to protest. If the entire above are brought into reality, indubitably aims of disobeying and resisting unjust laws are completed, however, stability of society no more exists, then where does the function of laws lie?

Therefore, resistance and disobey is not only an extreme and irrational behavior, but also inutility for social development, and thus should not be the resort to convey the dissatisfaction with unjust laws. The consummation of legislation, just like child’s growing up, needs guidance and remediation in a proper way. As far as I am concerned, the correct attitude toward the flaws of established laws is to make suggestions to the legislators through proper way. Only in this way could social regulations be perfected and meanwhile we maintain our legitimate rights and interests.

还有不到十天就考试了，焦虑中。。。请各位帮我看看都有哪些问题吧，谢谢了！
P.S. 对于论证我还有点茫然，恳请哪位好心人能讲一讲如何展开论证或者推荐一些这方面的帖子，不胜感激！

AdobereaderUID: 2864798

第一句我感觉改成but intems of wheher the laws is just or not好点吧，感觉有点冗长
真的，其他的我真没发现什么问题。词汇也挺高级的，值得学习。如果要是能达到这样一个水平应付考试就没什么问题了。
我还有脸周考我们共勉吧
有空看看我的好吗，写的不好别笑我。https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... 6amp%3Btypeid%3D101

wuyinheroUID: 2683653

写的挺好的啦。。