- 最后登录
- 2012-6-18
- 在线时间
- 74 小时
- 寄托币
- 320
- 声望
- 6
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-24
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 297
- UID
- 2861847

- 声望
- 6
- 寄托币
- 320
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-24
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
本帖最后由 PsMaggie 于 2010-8-7 22:36 编辑
TOPIC: ISSUE221 - "The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history."
WORDS: 643
TIME: 00:45:00
DATE: 2010/8/5 15:20:09
The author claims that the chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people from the past in which I think should be separated into two aspects. Does study of history truly confirm that we are totally different from people who lived at any other time in history? And is this consequence the chief benefit of the study of history? I fundamentally agree with the former while I couldn't agree the latter as I would discuss below.
Admittedly, there are many differences among different ages. Such as the attitude of treating women, the attitude towards science and the attitude towards religions and the like have change a lot. Cultural mores, customs, values and ideals are often referred by people to make a comparison to the past. As we all know that human being change their living condition from caves to thatched cottage, then to block house and finally to skyscraper. It is, indeed, inaccurate to say that we have nothing change in comparing with the other time in history. One of the most famous examples is that before Twentieth century, the sixties, women's status was in a very low place. However this attitude of women's status totally inverted after the Women's Liberation Movement which took place in Twentieth Century, the sixties in USA. Therefore, people do have something different among different times in history.
However, this assertion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history can't not be judged by those things on the surface. To understand what is really different, first we need to explore the natures of things. For instance, fashion changes every day, however does it mean that the nature of fashion changes every day? I'm afraid not, because the instinct of fashion which is the pursuing of beauty that from women doesn't change at all. And see from the ways of communication and mass media, people only read newspapers early on, then radio televisions are invented and now, internet becomes the quickest way of communication. It seems change a lot, but we need to notice that the essence of seeking information doesn't change that is to record information. Secondly, although our circumstance has made a difference, the law of historical development would never change. That is justice will eventually prevail over evil, residents will always guide the mainstream of history, failure would happen if leaders go without the masses and the like. No matter how the time changes, those regulars of history would never change.
And as to the former of this allegation which in my opinion is thoughtless would have a pile of flaws. Because there are many other more important benefits in study history. To study history is not only to find out differences. History is a mirror which possesses many functions like understand the origin of mankind, prevent the historical tragedy happens again, learn some knowledge of management of natural disasters and the like. For instance, we understand the control of military strategy and even business applications by reading the Three Kingdoms; we study the nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl to avoid nuclear accident happen again in the future; we get a better guidance in helping our children grow up accurately through research B.S Bloom's pedagogics. Thus in my opinion, in this study, people should place more emphasis on the role of previous generations to apocalypse the offspring.
To sum, beneficial it might be to appreciate the unchanging nature of humankind, however it is equally beneficial to understand and appreciate significant differences between peoples of different time periods----in terms of cultural mores, customs, values and ideals. What's more, to study history is not such a simple thing to find out differences among different eras, there are a great deals of values exist in this job.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
自改一:
The author claims that the chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people from the past in which I think should be separated into two aspects. Does study of history truly confirm that we are not totally different from people who lived at any other time in history? And is this consequence the chief benefit of the study of history? I fundamentally agree with the former while I couldn't agree the latter as I would discuss below.
Admittedly, there are many differences among different ages. Such as the attitude of treating women, the attitude towards science and the attitude towards religions and the like have change a lot. Cultural mores, customs, values and ideals are often referred by people to make a comparison to the past. As we all know that human being change their living condition from caves to thatched cottage, then to block house and finally to skyscraper. It is, indeed, inaccurate to say that we have nothing change in comparing with the other time in history. One of the most famous examples is that before Twentieth century, the sixties, women's status was in a very low place. However this attitude of women's status totally inverted after the Women's Liberation Movement which took place in Twentieth Century, the sixties in USA. Therefore, people do have something different among different times in history.
However, this assertion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history can't not be judged by those things on the surface. To understand what is really different, first we need to explore the natures of things. For instance, fashion changes every day, however does it mean that the nature of fashion changes every day? I'm afraid not, because the instinct of fashion which is the pursuing of beauty that from women doesn't change at all. And see from the ways of communication and mass media, people only read newspapers early on, then radio televisions are invented and now, internet becomes the quickest way of communication. It seems change a lot, but we need to notice that the essence of seeking information doesn't change that is to record information. Secondly, although our circumstance has made a difference, the law of historical development would never change. That is justice will eventually prevail over evil, residents will always guide the mainstream of history, failure would happen if leaders go without the masses and the like. No matter how the time changes, those regulars of history would never change.
And as to the former of this allegation which in my opinion is thoughtless would have a pile of flaws. Because there are many other more important benefits in study history. To study history is not only to find out differences. History is a mirror which possesses many functions like understand the origin of mankind, prevent the historical tragedy from happening again, learn some knowledge of management of natural disasters and the like. For instance, we understand the control of military strategy and even business applications by reading the Three Kingdoms; we study the nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl to avoid nuclear accident happen again in the future; we get a better guidance in helping our children grow up accurately through research B.S Bloom's pedagogics. Thus in my opinion, in this study, people should place more emphasis on the role of previous generations to apocalypse the offspring.
To sum, beneficial it might understand and appreciate significant differences between peoples of different time periods, however it is equally beneficial to appreciate the unchanging nature of humankind, ----in terms of cultural mores, customs, values and ideals. What's more, to study history is not such a simple thing to find out differences among different eras, there are a great deals of values exist in this job.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
自改二:
The author claims that the chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people from the past in which I think should be separated into two aspects. Does study of history truly confirm that we are not totally different from people who lived at any other time in history? And is this consequence the chief benefit of the study of history? I fundamentally agree with the former while I couldn't agree the latter as I would discuss below.
Admittedly, there are many differences among different ages. Such as the attitude of treating women, the attitude towards science and the attitude towards religions and the like have change a lot. Cultural mores, customs, values and ideals are often referred by people to make a comparison to the past. As we all know that human being change their living condition from caves to thatched cottage, then to block house and finally to skyscraper. It is, indeed, inaccurate to say that we have nothing change in comparing with the other time in history. One of the most famous examples is that before Twentieth century, the sixties, women's status was in a very low place. However this attitude of women's status totally inverted after the Women's Liberation Movement which took place in Twentieth Century, the sixties in USA. Therefore, people do have something different among different times in history.
However, this assertion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history can't not be judged by those things on the surface. To understand what is really different, first we need to explore the natures of things. For instance, fashion changes every day, however does it mean that the nature of fashion changes every day? I'm afraid not, because the instinct of fashion which is the pursuing of beauty that from women doesn't change at all. And see from the ways of communication and mass media, people only read newspapers early on, then radio televisions are invented and now, internet becomes the quickest way of communication. It seems change a lot, but we need to notice that the essence of seeking information doesn't change that is to record information. Secondly, although our circumstance has made a difference, the law of historical development would never change. That is justice will eventually prevail over evil, residents will always guide the mainstream of history, failure would happen if leaders go without the masses and the like. No matter how the time changes, those regulars of history would never change.
And as to the former of this allegation which in my opinion is thoughtless would have a pile of flaws. Because there are many other more important benefits in study history. To study history is not only to find out differences. History is a mirror which possesses many functions like understand the origin of mankind, prevent the historical tragedy from happening again, learn some knowledge of management of natural disasters and the like. For instance, we understand the control of military strategy and even business applications by reading the Three Kingdoms; we study the nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl to avoid nuclear accident happen again in the future; we get a better guidance in helping our children grow up accurately through research B.S Bloom's pedagogics. Thus in my opinion, in this study, people should place more emphasis on the role of previous generations to apocalypse the offspring.
To sum, beneficial it might understand and appreciate significant differences between peoples of different time periods, however it is equally beneficial to appreciate the unchanging nature of humankind, ----in terms of cultural mores, customs, values and ideals. What's more, to study history is not such a simple thing to find out differences among different eras, there are a great deals of values exist in this job. |
|