是不是argument比issue简单

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

在 寄托上 呆几十天了，也发来几十篇 帖子。

发现 发issue 和拍 issue 的数目 远远超过 argument。。是不是 大家 觉得 是不是argument比issue简单

还是 argument 的模板。。很好用。。

一木菩提UID: 2390164

不是模板的问题，argue套路相对明显，所以容易成型。
issue题目比较开放，大家思维各种发散，所以要集思广益。

irvine666UID: 2575525

从表面上看来是这样没错，不过90%的人最后A得分都比I低

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

为什么 A 比 I低呢？ 而且。。不是只有 一个分数吗。。怎么区分 A I？ 个人 由于 A 没有用 模板。。字数 少的可怜。。一般300左右的样子。。 3# irvine666

lingli_xiaoaiUID: 172506

不用模版字数也不至于这么少。。模版不是让人凑字数的。。要凑字数 不如就写300字算了。。因为模版都是废话，写了也是白写。

Even given that the seminar would improve the performance of their crew, author' claim that after attaining the seminar, the improved maintenance would leads to greater customer satisfaction is still indefensible. I would ask is there any causal relationship between the maintenance of airplanes with customer service. As a customer, as long as the airplane doesn't crash during the trip, he or she probably has no idea of how the airplane is maintained. If this is the case, how the improved maintenance alone would leads to greater customer satisfaction as author suggested. Even given that there are customers are care about that, no evidence suggest that the current maintenance quality is unacceptable and needs to improve, it is possible that the current mechanics are very good at their job and don't need to improve further. I would remain unconvinced until the author is given to make the logic link between custom satisfactions with airplane maintenance which is against common sense that if customer service is the problem, people actually doing customer services are those who need training but not mechanics.

我之前写的argument的一段。。你觉得这段有模版么。最多就是有些固定攻击逻辑错误的表达。一般按照这样批判逻辑错误。。一般30分钟 都是500+ 而且这段攻击的内容只是文章中的半句话。。都不是一整句 如果你把所有逻辑错误都攻击了，基本半个小时能写的长度 是你打字的速度制约的 而不是写得内容制约

zxwhy825UID: 2668443

谢谢。。版主。。版主 的大作就是。。一个点。说的很多  说顾客满意度和培训没关系  说了很多
这样 会不会。。有点 没抓住重点。。
像我写的
The director recommend that Get-Away Airlines should pay to send its crews to
the Quality-Care Seminar, by the following reasoning: based on the premises that the report of automobile racing industry, which demonstrates that crews perform better after the seminar, and the maintenance crews of them, perform similarly with that of Get-Away Airlines, the director conclude it will be a profitable investment.

Although, the reasoning of the director seems cogent at first glance, and the thinking for the sake of the company really worth admiring, there are some flaws in the both the premise and conclusion, which will be illustrated in turn.

Mulling over the report, the reliability of the report firstly occur in my mind. Does any expert provide evidence to demonstrate the reality of the report? Is it a report which is valid in only few areas and cannot stand for the national condition? Are the crews included representative for the whole crews? Without provide more fact answering these questions, it is not convinced that the seminar, in truth, betters the performance of the crews.

In addition, the assertion that "these maintenance crews perform many of the same functions as do our mechanics" remains vague. What is the definition of "many"? Half? Sixty percent? The direction should do more research to provide a exact number. What's more, the same functions the crews do not necessarily equal the same increasing of performance. Without considering other elements influencing the performance, such as the difference of the machines and environment, it is too hasty to get the conclusion. Perhaps the different environment results in the opposite effect of the seminar.


Finally, even if both of the premises are reliable, it is imprudent to get the conclusion, that the seminar will lead to improving maintenance and greatening customer satisfaction and profits. There are a lot of factor affecting the maintenance, customer satisfaction and profits, without taking them into consideration, it will undermine the convincing of the suggestion. Take the issue of profit as an example. The final profit relies on the cost and revenue. However, there are exact compassion of the potential cost and revenue of the seminar in the memo. Without that, we cannot get the conclusion that the suggestion will lead the company to the future of profit.

In sum, there is reason to believe the loyalty of the director. However, there is no reason to the take the suggestion just by the information provided by the memo. To improve the effectiveness of the memo, the director should give more information in detail showing the reality of the report and the similarity of the two companies. To prove the suggestion will lead to better performance of the crews, customer satisfaction and the profit, the director need to do more research to get the exact number. (466)



当然 可能 我打字也慢了点。。开头写完 就剩20分钟了。
。 5# lingli_xiaoai