人生第一篇ISSUE,ISSUE51（第一高频），花费我两小时（泪！），求拍！

tobywangUID: 2323485

整整两小时。。对ISSUE有抵触情绪，今天终于闷头写了。。请大神们给个薄面看两眼～




The speakerthinks that the true effective education is not of the type which spreadsgenerally designed knowledge to everyone, but of the type that  caters topersonal needs and interests. In my opinion, education that focuses on thegeneral and education that concentrates on individual demand are  equallyimportant to make the education system a real successful one. There should be abalance achieved between.

Beforegoing into the problem, it would be wise to give a general interpretation ofthe word education, what purpose it is to achieve and what kind of  property agood education should have. Education is defined as the process by whichsociety deliberately transmits it accumulated knowledge, skills and  values fromone generation to another. In any sense education itself isn’t a constant system,but a continuously changing, sometimes fast refreshing one  that absorbs newlydiscovered knowledge and ideas, meanwhile eliminates those which is not up todate anymore and those that seems to be contradictive  to the newly foundedknowledge. But there is one thing a good education system inherently wants tomaintain, that is, it always tries to  impart knowledge that is considered “good”,and tries to avoid those considered “evil”, though it’s a common sense that it’simpossible to achieve a perfect  situation. Thus in order to further judge if aneducation method is an effective one, the basic spirit of education is what wemust stick to.

Traditionallydesigned education greatly put concerns on the generals, or the majority. Teacheris surrounded by students. Stuff taught by teacher is  generally-oriented whichis designed to comprehensively improve the average academic or moral standardsof most students. Few students have privilege  or priority to access extras fromthe teacher. It’s a common sense that in order to maintain a decent teachingquality, the teacher pushes students by  assigning a considerable amount of workto everyone, regardless of the individual’s like. Here comes the obviousdisadvantage of education of this type,  that the actual implementation oftraditional education is as stiff as the description of it. The stiffness moreor less strangles colourful imagination and  individual desire for each one’sown life goals.
However, there is somethinggood to say about traditional education, that is, it is so conservative thatthere  is a shapeless framework settled by it on students, avoiding them frombeing too aberrant to the normal society. Students may not become  extraordinaryby accepting traditional education, but neither need they worry about they willturn “evil”, since the moral ideas imparted by traditional  education are mostlywell constructed, common accepted “good” ones.

In myopinion, one of the very exciting developments in education fields is that educatorsbegin to systematically switch their concentration between  generally-orientededucation and individually-oriented one. On one hand, students are more andmore often surrounded by teachers who wish to teach  them knowledge of theirinterests. On the other hand, students have much more flexibility to give uptheir dislike and pick up their preference, without  being put into adisadvantage position in the competition with their mates. No doubt that thefaster paces of social and scientific developments obey some  shining principlessuch as Moore’s rule, however the innovation of education must have put onpositive impacts on the developing rate. Without those  who  jump out of the box andsuccessfully find the right education for themselves such as Steve Jobs andMark Zuckerburg, we won’t have artistically built  Iphone device and powerfulsocializing tool Facebook. Thus, individually-oriented education should behighly praised for its contribution on  encouraging creativity and its greatmomentum for those who want to seek a life goal different from others. However,when it’s optimistic to watch  someone jump out of a box, it’s terrible to watchthose who completely cross the line. Individually-oriented education is notmature enough that it is still  lack of power to confine students within thecircle of “good”, though sometimes it’s hard to differentiate between “good”and
“evil” without observing the outcome. Thus lacking adequate self-control ability, people who switch toindividually-oriented study may possibly receive a counterproductive result, especially on the moral side.

In aconclusion, both generally-oriented and individually-oriented educations have theirrespective advantage and disadvantage. Though it’s true that  studentsthemselves should be responsible for which kind of educations they choose toreceive, they are too ignorant compared to the huge education  system. Thus, theeducation system itself should properly deal with its various advantages anddisadvantages and find a balance between. Only in this  case we can call theeducation an efficient one.

tobywangUID: 2323485

Sorry..这个是断好句子的版本。。多谢了！

The speaker thinks that the true effective education is not of the type which spreads generally designed knowledge to everyone, but of the type that  caters to personal needs and interests. In my opinion, education that focuses on the general and education that concentrates on individual demand are  equally important to make the education system a real successful one. There should be a balance achieved between.

Before going into the problem, it would be wise to give a general interpretation of the word education, what purpose it is to achieve and what kind of  property a good education should have. Education is defined as the process by which society deliberately transmits it accumulated knowledge, skills and  values from one generation to another. In any sense education itself isn’t a constant system,but a continuously changing, sometimes fast refreshing one  that absorbs newly discovered knowledge and ideas, meanwhile eliminates those which is not up to date anymore and those that seems to be contradictive  to the newly founded knowledge. But there is one thing a good education system inherently wants to maintain, that is, it always tries to  impart knowledge that is considered “good”,and tries to avoid those considered “evil”, though it’s a common sense that it’s impossible to achieve a perfect  situation. Thus in order to further judge if an education method is an effective one, the basic spirit of education is what we must stick to.

Traditionally designed education greatly put concerns on the generals, or the majority. Teacher is surrounded by students. Stuff taught by teacher is  generally-oriented which is designed to comprehensively improve the average academic or moral standards of most students. Few students have privilege  or priority to access extras from the teacher. It’s a common sense that in order to maintain a decent teaching quality, the teacher pushes students by  assigning a considerable amount of work to everyone, regardless of the individual’s like. Here comes the obvious disadvantage of education of this type,  that the actual implementation of traditional education is as stiff as the description of it. The stiffness more or less strangles colourful imagination and  individual desire for each one’s own life goals.
However, there is something good to say about traditional education, that is, it is so conservative that there  is a shapeless framework settled by it on students, avoiding them from being too aberrant to the normal society. Students may not become  extraordinary by accepting traditional education, but neither need they worry about they will turn “evil”, since the moral ideas imparted by traditional  education are mostly well constructed, common accepted “good” ones.

In my opinion, one of the very exciting developments in education fields is that educators begin to systematically switch their concentration between  generally-oriented education and individually-oriented one. On one hand, students are more and more often surrounded by teachers who wish to teach  them knowledge of their interests. On the other hand, students have much more flexibility to give up their dislike and pick up their preference, without  being put into a disadvantage position in the competition with their mates. No doubt that the faster paces of social and scientific developments obey some  shining principlessuch as Moore’s rule, however the innovation of education must have put on positive impacts on the developing rate. Without those  who  jump out of the box and successfully find the right education for themselves such as Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerburg, we won’t have artistically built  Iphone device and powerful socializing tool Facebook. Thus, individually-oriented education should be highly praised for its contribution on  encouraging creativity and its great momentum for those who want to seek a life goal different from others. However,when it’s optimistic to watch  someone jump out of a box, it’s terrible to watch those who completely cross the line. Individually-oriented education is not mature enough that it is still  lack of power to confine students within the circle of “good”, though sometimes it’s hard to differentiate between “good”and
“evil” without observing the outcome. Thus lacking adequate self-control ability, people who switch to individually-oriented study may possibly receive a counterproductive result, especially on the moral side.

In a conclusion, both generally-oriented and individually-oriented educations have their respective advantage and disadvantage. Though it’s true that  students themselves should be responsible for which kind of educations they choose to receive, they are too ignorant compared to the huge education  system. Thus, the education system itself should properly deal with its various advantages and disadvantages and find a balance between. Only in this  case we can call the education an efficient one.

tobywangUID: 2323485

题目是：
education will be truly effective only when it is specifically designed to meet the individual needs and interests of each student

蒲若苇UID: 2669670

让自己的作文被改主要有以下几种途径：

1、参与/组建互助小组；

2、主动出击，到别人的习作中改别人的文章，然后留下连接请求回拍，绝大部分情况下版友都会很负责的回拍的；

3、版主会开习作修改铺，满足要求之后版主就会修改你的习作；

4、同主题写作时会规定参与的版友按照一定的回贴顺序进行互改；

5、参加零散版友作文互改
ISSUE https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1118991-1-1.html
ARGUMENT https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1118994-1-1.html

6、坐等别人来拍，由于习作量很大，这种概率很小，所以效率也很低，建议不要采用。

另：具体也可参考此帖：https://bbs.gter.net/thread-709588-1-1.html

LZ加油加油~~