[LR][PT33-S4-Q23] Some vegetarians

duijinxiaoziUID: 2585955

[LR][PT33-S4-Q23] Some vegetarians

Some vegetarians have argued that there are two individually sufficient reasons for not eating meat--one based on health considerations, and the other based on the aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures. But suppose that eating meat were essential to good health for humans. Then it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat. ====================================================== 为什么suppose那一句不打第一个reason呢?

duijinxiaoziUID: 2585955

vegetarians 说有2 个原因，不吃肉：
（1）health considerations
（2） aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures.
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
假如（suppose that），第一个原因是不成立的（eating meat were essential to good health for humans）。
所以，vegetarians 是 瞎掰，胡说。
所以，vegetarians 的 credit 下降。
所以，vegetarians 说的 第二个 原因，也不一定成立。（it would be less clear that an aversion to living at the expense of other conscious creatures is enough of a reason to stop eating meat.）

waimanUID: 2892309

謝謝版主!!

darkathrunUID: 2813505

开始看LSAT啦。。。Tim你是帮waiman答疑的木

waimanUID: 2892309

抱歉, 更正一下, 这是PT32的题
另外, 下午想了一下, 这样说来我一开始想的不算错
suppose that eating meat were essential to good health
所以选了(C)
It is used to disprove the claim that a vegetarian diet is healthy.
但是正解(D)
It is used to weaken the claim that the consciousness of animals is a sufficient reason for not eating meat.

这边还真是难, 照答案来看, disprove应该不算有误吧, 题目的本意似乎就是说只打第二个reason而非第一个

(ps. Tim你是帮waiman答疑的贵人, 木是什么意思？ 浮木吗？)

darkathrunUID: 2813505

啊。。。。。木就是么，。。。