本帖最后由 ydycgwll 于 2010-10-4 23:32 编辑
Issue11："All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."
I disagree with the assertion to build a global university in which all nations develop talented students to solve problems that have existed for a long time. It’s certain that the aspiration of the speaker can be eulogizable, especially the consciousness of cooperation and the sense of responsibility. However, I doubt that the suggestion above can be practiced, even the answer regarded as positive, the situations of a problem in different nations appear in different manners so that different project should be designed. Totally speaking, a comprehension is lying on the road.
Plenty of persistent social problems have been haunting the world for decades, though human beings have fought as far as possible. One of the reason that the effects are so slight is they fought single-handedly. For some extremely difficult issues, such as racial discrimination, warfare, cure for cancer, forecast of earthquake and seaquake etc., the power of one or two countries is trying to quench the fire of a cartload of firewood with one cup of water（这个用法查过，但的确有点中文化呵呵）, which unquestionably demand deeply communication and cooperation among nations just like the speaker’s propose. But, whether investment in establishing a global university of that kind can remove those persistent problems or not, evidently, is not enough.这段主要是要说明严重问题没得到解决，并最后引出题中作者的提议是远远不够的
The most important thing is far away a university mentioned above, unnecessary for you to doubt the ability of the United Nations calling together some experts to research some problem, but the determination of contribution, collaboration and cast of selfishness. Nowadays, wars have been lasting among U.S and other several counties, like Iran and Iraq. The wars completely could have been avoided if the United State could not be so heroism and greedy. Take Taiwan as an instance, a part of China from remote age for ever invaded occupied by Spain, Holland and Japan, would have returned back if American and Japan had not been intervening internal affairs of China by offering weapons to Taiwan and so on. Why did the two counties do like that? From the intrinsic, they attempted to block the speedy development of China for afraid of their imaginary overland.这一段段首主题句，说明最关键的不是建学校，而是各国应该增强合作、理解、收敛自私的决心，后面举反例
So, in my points, an organization （built up to launch a campaign for demanding peace in the worldwide这是一个后置定语，意思是要表达:建立一个组织以在全世界范围内发起世界需要和平的倡议和运动） will be more(不是比较级，而是adj更加的) useful. Or to say, building the university is not to spread knowledge but educate only the president of all countries about these peace ideas and the evil of warfare and so on. We can make presidents of countries where prevail racial discrimination receive some unjust treatment by changing the roles in the reality(或者说，建立一个学校教各国总统关于和平的美好以及战争的罪恶==，还可以让存在种族歧视的国家领导人在这里换演角色来接受不公正的待遇). Moreover, strict punishment rules on the countries that rise warfare without considering the reason should be drew up by the United Nation.这段是在举例说明用什么样的方法来增强各国之间的合作、理解==
In sum, the most crucial problem is each nation should deepen their understand to survive of human beings, peace among nations, and understand to our companies as the same species.
| 
发表于 2010-10-3 18:50:00
签到领寄托币
GO
转发
