issue168

ilikeappleUID: 135385

Critical judgment of work, in any given field has little value unless comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

synopsis:
一 专家的意见不能作为唯一的评判标准
二，必须承认专家的评判具有一定的参考价值
三，但是，专家也可能作出不公正的评价
四，过于迷信专家的评价还可能打击创造性，扼杀新手的积极性

Critical judgment of work from expert in that field, although being of great significance and reference value, should not be taken as the only criteria to assess the work.

Judgment from the experts, with their good command of relevant knowledge and experience, can be of great value. As we know, so-called experts are those who are specialized in some certain fields, say, arts, physics and etc.. They boast much more abundant experience and better grasp of knowledge relevant to their fields than their peers. Therefore, in some sense, they are regarded as authoritarians in the fields; and in most cases, their judgment can work as objective standard to value the relevant work. As a matter of fact, the general public tend to believe in what the experts say about the work and then admire it. For example, there are archeologists on whom the public depend to judge whether a certain piece of antique is a fake or not. In film, they can turn to the movie critics to tell which movie is a masterpiece and which one is rubbish. Generally speaking, their judgment is relative objective and should be treated seriously.

Nonetheless, experts are not perfect; they may make wrong or biased judgment to work in their fields. The pool of knowledge, even in a certain field, is so vast that even for such a great scientist as Newton, there are areas in physics he did not manage to reach. It is likely that he would not be able to make a justifiable assessment to a certain piece of work which was associated with area which he was ignorant of or knew nothing about. Furthermore, as common human beings, experts are also innate to some shortcomings such as prejudice, which will damage the justness of their assessment. In this sense, regarding the experts with blind belief may detrimental in that the work misjudged by them would be treated fairly.

Experts can not be treated as the only arbiter of work not only because of their limitation on their knowledge and human nature, but also because of the restriction of their previous experience and established knowledge on the fairness of their judgment; they could be taken as conventions to hamper the originality and creativeness in that field. While the knowledge and experience of the experts help them to be seemingly superior to others and entitle them to judge work or their peers, they also can work negatively by preventing the experts to be open-minded, to accept the new ideas and judge them appropriately. As a result, work of the novices, those who tend to challenge the established knowledge by doing the job in new ways or thinking of it from new angles, would face the threat of not being recognized by the experts who are confined to their old formats, and consequently being denied by the general public. Depressed by the "failure", the tyros, if not at the worst become in despair and never steam up any longer, may lose impetus to innovate in that field. In the long run, the development of that field will witness a retarded future.

In sum, when judging work of a certain field, experts may help but cannot be taken as the only judger because of their limitation in knowledge and potential harm to the originality of the relevant people if misjudgment is involved. In order to make an as fair judgment as possible to the work, various means should be taken, including putting it to laboratory experiments or practical exercise.

ilikeappleUID: 135385

为什么没人理呢？郁闷ing

ilikeappleUID: 135385

真ft，等了那么久也没人来说上两句。是我的文章问题太多？拜托大家好歹吱个声阿。
还有版主呢？

happyman2000UID: 136936

我正在看ing

blooming_leeUID: 135884

As we know, so-called experts are those who are specialized in some certain fields, say, arts, physics and etc..
应该是：As we know, so-called experts are those who are specialized in some certain fields, say, arts, physics, etc.

标点的正确使用是中国gter的弱点，建议大家考前读点关于标点的标准使用方法的书。

ilikeapple，今天太晚了，明天再仔细看看。把你的文搬到上面去先。（那个啊，被斑竹ignore的滋味真不好受。。。我了解。。。heheee）

feier521UID: 109747

Critical judgment of work from expert in that field, although being of great significance and reference value, should not be taken as the only criteria to assess the work. （开头是不是简单了点？不如补充点原因）

Judgment from the experts, with their good command of relevant knowledge and experience, can be of great value. As we know, so-called（用在这里不好，贬义） experts are those who are specialized in some certain fields, say, arts, physics and(etc.前不用and) etc.. They boast（也是贬义吧） much more abundant experience and better grasp of knowledge relevant to their fields than their peers. Therefore, in some sense, they are regarded as authoritarians in the fields; and（in most cases罗索点，可以省掉） their judgment can work as objective standard to value the relevant work. As a matter of fact, the general public tend to believe in what the experts say about the work and then admire it. For example, there are archeologists on whom the public depend to judge whether a certain piece of antique is a fake or not. In film, they can turn to the movie critics to tell which movie is a masterpiece and which one is rubbish. Generally speaking, their judgment is relative objective and should be treated seriously.

Nonetheless, experts are not perfect; they may make wrong or biased judgment to（on） work in their fields. The pool of knowledge, even in a certain field, is so vast that even for such a great scientist as Newton, there are areas in physics he did not manage to reach.（这一句有点乱，knowledge so vast that there are…? 不如改成 he cannot manage to reach any areas in physics）It is likely that he would not be able to make a justifiable assessment to a certain piece of work which was associated with area（定语从句太多，不如 in some areas） which he was ignorant of or knew nothing about. Furthermore, as common human beings, experts are also innate to (缺点不是天生的吧，呵呵，不如用have） some shortcomings such as prejudice, which will damage the justness of their assessment. In this sense, regarding the experts with blind belief may (be) detrimental in that the work misjudged by them would be treated fairly. （最后一句？？因果关系？盲目崇拜专家有害，因为误判的作品会被公正的处理？）

Experts can not be treated as the only arbiter of work not only because of their limitation on their knowledge and human nature, but also because of the restriction of their previous experience and established knowledge on the fairness of their judgment（是不是有点重复啊？not only knowledge but also knowledge，直接说他们保守的经验和评价标准）; they could be taken as conventions(traditionists) to hamper the originality and creativeness（creativity） in that field. While the knowledge and experience (of the experts) help them to be seemingly superior to others and entitle them to judge work or their peers, they also can work negatively by preventing the experts to be open-minded, to accept the new ideas and judge them(the work) appropriately. As a result, work of the novices, those who tend to challenge the established knowledge by doing the job in new ways or thinking of it from new angles, would face the threat of not being recognized by the experts who are confined to their old formats, and consequently being denied by the general public. （好长啊）Depressed by the "failure", the tyros, if not at the worst become in despair and never steam up any longer, may lose impetus to innovate in that field. In the long run, the development of that field will witness a retarded future.

In sum, when judging work of a certain field, experts may help but cannot be taken as the only judger because of their limitation in knowledge and potential harm to the originality of the relevant people if misjudgment is involved. In order to make an as fair judgment as possible (make a judgment as fair as possible) to the work, various means should be taken, including putting it to laboratory experiments or practical exercise.

我觉得比我写的好多了，你的句式用的很好，插入，定语从句，不过有时感觉有点罗索。

版主们要改很多文章，挺忙的，难免会顾及不周。
看你很着急，帮你看了看。水平有限，共同提高！

paisleyUID: 64183

我觉得你写得很不错啊。语言很好。基本上没问题了。

内容上，也不错了。只是觉得如果能再深入些就好了。另外，可以再加几个例子，你现在通篇都是说理，形式变化不够。


另外，希望你也能多多修改其他朋友的文章。如果觉得自己的英文还不是特别好，那么不一定要改他们的词句, 提点结构上和想法上的建议也是好的。因为你不可能每个题目都练过来啊，看别人的题目，自己脑子过一遍,既可以给别人提建议，自己又多了一次训练的机会.为别人服务的人优先得到斑竹的修改哦！

tomatoeggsUID: 82073

看ing啊，我们不可能即刻回复的。请耐心点。

feier521UID: 109747

如果觉得自己的英文还不是特别好，那么不一定要改他们的词句, 提点结构上和想法上的建议也是好的。

咦？？？
我怎么觉得提思想和结构的问题比提字句的问题更难一些啊？
可能自己缺乏思维分析能力，：D

ilikeappleUID: 135385

谢谢拉,自己看的时候还没有发现那么多毛病呢,的确是很罗嗦,本人的一贯毛病,一定好好改

其实也看别人的文章,但是就不怕乱发评论误人子弟  :)