11-17提纲作业argument 164

zcsdtcUID: 2875047

164Claitown University needs both affordable housing for its students and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings. It is common knowledge that tourists are willing to pay money to tour some of the architect's buildings, so it can be expected that tourists will want to visit this new building. The income from the fees charged to tourists will soon cover the building costs. Furthermore, such a building will attract new students as well as donations from alumni. And even though such a building will be much larger than our current need for student housing, part of the building can be used as office space.

请于23：30 之前将提纲跟帖回复

zcsdtcUID: 2875047

The author asserts that the best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings.
reason:1.tourists are willing to pay money to tour some of the architect's buildings, so it can be expected that tourists will want to visit this new building.
2.The income from the fees charged to tourists will soon cover the building costs. 3.Furthermore, such a building will attract new students as well as donations from alumni. 4. even though such a building will be much larger than our current need for student housing, part of the building can be used as office space.
反驳：1.游客愿意为参观有名的建筑付钱，而我们建的这座建筑会出名吗？一个著名的建筑师的作品，不是都会出名的。所以，依靠这个赚钱是不可靠的。
2.建筑的花费会很大的，光靠游客的参观收入是不可靠的，而且如果可靠，何时能够收回成本也是未知的，可能会是一个非常漫长的过程。
3.学生来我们学校是因为我们的教育水平好，质量高，而不是因为一座楼……而校友会捐助也不会因为一座楼而增加，作者对这方面的认识是不够的，论断是盲目的。
4.如果将多余的空间用作办公场所，对于成本的收回是不利的。而也是浪费的。是不合理的建设方案。

zhangwanyingUID: 2775533

This is a unfounded statement because illogical reasoning and absence of necessary evidence.

(1)The author has not provided a basic description of  this building, the environment around it,so it is unpersuasive to claim that to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings for housing is a reasonable choice.

(2) No evidence is provided to show that the tourists will want to visit this new building and even spend some money on it, the author fails to give a feasible and persuasive profit model of this plan.

(3) The author has not evaluate the building costs and fails to estimate the profit of the new building, so it is imprudent to claim that the income from the fees charged to rourists will soon cover the costs.

(4)At the absence of  details such as living environment, location, rental prices, and the alumni's attitude toward it , it is unreasonable to make such hasty conclusion that the building will attract nesw students as well as donations from alumni.

(5) The author has not provided a clear constuction planning of this building, so the assertion that the building will be larger than the current need for student housing and can also arract customers who need office space, is vaild.

(6)The author has not take other solutions which may be more economical and acceptable into consideration.

daniexiaUID: 2403405

(1) The correlation between the declination of salamander in mountain lakes and the increasing amount of ultraviolet that reaches the Earth is not causal relationship, even though they happen at the same time.
(2) It may be not the case that the increase in ultrviolet radiation damaged salamander eggs and prevented them from hatching.
(3) By relying on the declination of the species of salamander that lays eggs in mountain lakes, the author cannot conclude that all species of salamander suffers from this kind of climate change.
(4) Even if salamander may be harmed by the increase of ultraviolet, it is still unfair to claim that the harm will not doubt cause population declines in other species.