风雨与共 第一周issue by 【5】

arksapmis30UID: 2973097

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"



In this era of rapid technological and social change which result in more and more heated disputation among people with diverse educational and political perspective about the certain issue of restriction on the scientific advancement. It might be tempting to think that politically intervening the natural path towards further scientific progress and fruition would jeopardize the philosophical foundation of science as a result, in that the political restriction will absolutely cause the distortion of the basic will and principle of scientists, and then alternate the purpose of upcoming inventions and technologies, which would be potentially detrimental to the society and humanity. Although such concerns indeed tend to be somewhat convincing, However in my view appropriate restriction conducted by the government can serve as a guideline for leading the correct direction of scientific progress.

First of all, it is undeniable that egregious political restriction on the progress in scientific research and development pose certain risk that will ultimately distort the inchoate idea of most scientists, which is to get a completely comprehension of the whole world from various aspects and further the quality of life. By making such restriction, political leaders always tend to intrude their own political perspective and idea on the decision of the direction of scientific progress. History is fully replete with evidences that can firmly substantiate such concern. Consider, for example, during the second-world-war many technologies were invented by contemporary scientists. Those inventions, such as atomic bomb, and aqua regia, were undoubtedly the result of that time’s policies. Such inventions completely deviated from the original purpose of scientific research and development, left nothing but harm and pain to the world. Also considering the crucial restriction on the scientific development conducted by the Soviet Union for the purpose of obtaining enough military force against the United State, which is to completely place the priority on the development for the military purpose while on the other hand largely ignore the importance of furthering the civilians’ life quality.

However, just like the market system need the appropriate adjustment and control conducted by the government, the scientific research and development also require adequate restriction founded by government. Otherwise we risk defeating the further social progress because of the blindness of scientific research and development. As we know, scientists are largely stimulated and propelled by the eager to fully comprehend the world as a whole. Therefore when confronting with the interesting but immoral subject most scientists choose to neglect the immorality of such subject and delve in it. Consider,, for instance, the controversial issue of clone. From the perspective of both humanity and religion such activity is unacceptable, this is especially true when it comes to the clone of human being .But such research still continues to be popular among the biologists. The end result of making an appropriate law to restrict such research, in this case, is to erect the acceptable philosophical foundation of science.

Moreover, without the support of the government, the research and development of a certain field would be impossible to continue. At most of time the government’s policies are sufficient to be representatives of the mainstream ideas and views of contemporary society. Complying with such policies and restriction might be greatly helpful to the further increase of the life quality and working efficiency. Restriction with definitive priority on the right issue can largely impel the efficiency and instructiveness of scientific research and development. Thus enacting the right restriction and policy demands the long-term deliberation and communication among the politicians in power. Only in that way can the true scientific objectives be achieved.

In sum, even though egregious restriction will distort the inchoate purpose of scientific research, it does not mean that scientific development with no restriction will be beneficial to the society as a whole. In order to largely reap the benefit from the scientific development contemporary government have to enact certain laws and policies to serve as a guide for correcting the direction of scientific development and avoid risking from the blindness of scientific research. Only in that way can the true objectives be achieved.

shawn_pysUID: 2770388

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

老兵的文章写的很有水准啊，有很多值得学习的地方，个人能力十分有限……希望多多交流~

In this era of rapid technological and social change which result in more and more heated disputation among people with diverse educational and political perspective about the certain issue of restriction on the scientific advancement. It might be tempting to think that politically intervening the natural path towards further scientific progress and fruition would jeopardize the philosophical foundation of science as a result, in that the political restriction will absolutely cause the distortion of the basic will and principle of scientists, and then alternate the purpose of upcoming inventions and technologies, which would be potentially detrimental to the society and humanity. Although such concerns indeed tend to be somewhat convincing, However in my view appropriate restriction conducted by the government can serve as a guideline for leading the correct direction of scientific progress. 【举了3个反面观点，1. 政治干涉会损害科学的哲学基础； 2. 政治限制会引起科学家基本愿望跟原则的扭曲； 3. 改变研究中的发明、技术的目的，对社会造成潜在的威胁】【3个观点步步深入，赞一个~】【正面观点：政府应该适当加以限制，以起到导向作用】

First of all, it is undeniable that egregious political restriction on the progress in scientific research and development pose certain risk that will ultimately distort the inchoate idea of most scientists, which is to get a completely comprehension of the whole world from various aspects and further the quality of life. By making such restriction, political leaders always tend to intrude their own political perspective and idea on the decision of the direction of scientific progress. History is fully replete with evidences that can firmly substantiate such concern. Consider, for example, during the second-world-war many technologies were invented by contemporary scientists. Those inventions, such as atomic bomb, and aqua regia【这个例子好像不太合适，王水好像不是为了战争的目的吧？】, were undoubtedly the result of that time’s policies. Such inventions completely deviated from the original purpose of scientific research and development, left nothing but harm and pain to the world. Also considering the crucial restriction on the scientific development conducted by the Soviet Union for the purpose of obtaining enough military force against the United State, which is to completely place the priority on the development for the military purpose while on the other hand largely ignore the importance of furthering the civilians’ life quality. 【这个例子对论证政府限制科研有什么危害好像没说清楚，建议再加上一句】

However, just like the market system need the appropriate adjustment and control conducted by the government, the scientific research and development also require adequate restriction founded by government. Otherwise we risk defeating the further social progress because of the blindness of scientific research and development.【这一个论述没有论据支撑，感觉不是很让人信服，虽然后面给出了不加限制的危害，但只是对有争论，会对社会造成威胁的方面加以论证，好像这个是在下一段中论证的，是不是放后面比较好？】 As we know, scientists are largely stimulated and propelled by the eager to fully comprehend the world as a whole. Therefore when confronting with the interesting but immoral subject most scientists choose to neglect the immorality of such subject and delve in it. Consider, for instance, the controversial issue of clone. From the perspective of both humanity and religion such activity is unacceptable, this is especially true when it comes to the clone of human being .But such research still continues to be popular among the biologists. The end result of making an appropriate law to restrict such research, in this case, is to erect the acceptable philosophical foundation of science.

Moreover, without the support of the government, the research and development of a certain field would be impossible to continue. At most of time the government's policies are sufficient to be representatives of the mainstream ideas and views of contemporary society. Complying with such policies and restriction might be greatly helpful (for scientific researchers) to the further increase of the life quality and working efficiency (of the society at large). Restriction with definitive priority on the right issue can largely impel the efficiency and instructiveness of scientific research and development. Thus enacting the right restriction and policy demands the long-term(provident) deliberation and communication among the politicians in power. Only in that way can the true scientific objectives be achieved.【此句建议删掉，或者改改，跟末段重复了，这句应该好改点】【意思是政府已经在无形之中施加了限制吧？感觉点出这一点比较好】

In sum, even though egregious restriction will distort the inchoate purpose of scientific research, it does not mean that scientific development with no restriction will be beneficial to the society as a whole. In order to largely reap the benefit from the scientific development contemporary government have to enact certain laws and policies to serve as a guide for correcting the direction of scientific development and avoid risking from the blindness of scientific research. Only in that way can the true objectives be achieved. 【这句跟上段的重复了，建议改下，或者把上一段的删掉】

部落联盟fiveUID: 2602690

69"Governmentshould place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research anddevelopment"
from 千寻：
philosEric的语言驾驭能力比我强大很多，千寻很是羞愧，我的意见是希望philosEric在用论述支持中心思想的时候，一定要完全围绕中心展开，最好不要只展开其中的某个方面，就是用例证全面的展现你的中心句的意思。
In this era of rapid technologicaland social change which result in more and more heated disputation among peoplewith diverse educational and political perspective about the certain issue ofrestriction on the scientific advancement. It might be tempting to think thatpolitically intervening the natural path towards further scientific progressand fruition would jeopardize the philosophical foundation of science as aresult, in that the political restriction will absolutely cause the distortionof the basic will and principle of scientists, and then alternate the purposeof upcoming inventions and technologies, which would be potentially detrimentalto the society and humanity. Although such concerns indeed tend to be somewhatconvincing, However in my view appropriate restriction conducted by thegovernment can serve as a guideline for leading the correct direction ofscientific progress.

First of all, it is undeniable that egregiouspolitical restriction on the progress in scientific research and development posecertain risk that will ultimately distort the inchoate idea of most scientists, which is to get acompletely comprehension of the whole world from various aspects and furtherthe quality of life[restriction distort intention]. By making such restriction, political leaders alwaystend to intrude their own political perspective and idea on the decision of thedirection of scientific progress[leader’s mistake]. History is fully repletewith evidences that can firmly substantiate such concern. Consider, forexample, during the second-world-war many technologies were invented bycontemporary scientists. Those inventions, such as atomic bomb, and aquaregia, were undoubtedly the result of that time’s policies[exemplify].Such inventions completely deviated from the original purpose of scientificresearch and development, left nothing but harm and pain to the world. Alsoconsidering the crucial restriction on the scientific development conducted bythe Soviet Union for the purpose of obtaining enough military force against theUnited State, which is to completely place the priority on the development forthe military purpose while on the other hand largely ignore the importance offurthering the civilians’ life quality[exemplify]. [例证过于简单：只提及战争带来的伤害，但是中心思想是科学家的目的被扭曲了 因此应该加入对于带来伤害的那些战争科学产物本来是如何准备用于造福人类的呢]

However, just like the market system need the appropriate adjustment andcontrol conducted by the government, the scientific research and development also require adequaterestriction founded by government【中心】. Otherwise we risk defeating the further social progress becauseof the blindness of scientific research and development【补充解释中心句】. As we know, scientists are largely stimulatedand propelled by the eager to fully comprehend the world as a whole【科学家的目的】. Therefore when confronting with the interesting but immoralsubject most scientists choose to neglect the immorality of such subject anddelve in it【导致偏差的原因】. Consider, for instance, the controversialissue of clone【举例中心句】. From the perspective of both humanity andreligion such activity is unacceptable, this is especially true when it comesto the clone of human being【one aspect】 .But such research still continues to bepopular among the biologists[现状]. The end result of making an appropriate lawto restrict such research, in this case, is to erect the acceptablephilosophical foundation of science【此例证的逻辑是：此研究的缺陷—其现状—导致的结果，我的建议是，在缺点和现状中补充一点关于克隆为什么这么popular的原因，感觉上会承接的很自然一点】.

Moreover,without the support of the government, the research and development of acertain field would be impossible to continue【science need G’s support】. At most of time the government’s policies aresufficient to be representatives of the mainstream ideas and views ofcontemporary society[G often right]. Complying with such policies andrestriction might be greatly helpful to the further increase of the lifequality and working efficiency[ So, obey G]. Restriction with definitivepriority on the right issue can largely impel the efficiency andinstructiveness of scientific research and development[G’s restriction--advantage].Thus enacting the right restriction and policy demands the long-term deliberationand communication among the politicians in power[ so G should do sth]. Only inthat way can the true scientific objectives be achieved.[中心明确 但是论证不是非常直接 比如在说G能够代表主流意见时，可以补充一点具体的阐述：他好-他为什么好-所以我们要支持他，这样感觉上支持会更强大的 ]

In sum, even though egregious restriction will distort the inchoate purpose ofscientific research, it does not mean that scientific development with norestriction will be beneficial to the society as a whole【general topic】. In order to largely reap the benefit from thescientific development contemporary government have to enact certain laws andpolicies to serve as a guide for correcting the direction of scientificdevelopment and avoid risking from the blindness of scientific research[reason].Only in that way can the true objectives be achieved[result].