风雨与共 第一周issue by 【9】

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

69"Government should placefew, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"

Is it necessary for a government to exert overmany restrictions on scientific research and development? Some people assert that science is indubitably a kind of pure subjects and should not be interveneby authority. However, from my perspective, scientific research and development are closely interrelated with our current way of life and also accompany acertain amount of danger, which may be out of control and threaten people’shealth without restriction. Therefore, Government should implement an effective management to these researches.

Generally speaking, scientists in the researches are simple and easy to donate themselves into the experiments so that they are possible to be misled and utilizedto excogitate some dangerous things by careerists which may bring disasters to our society, such as Human Cloning, biochemistry weapon, the nuclear bomb,without the controlling. In addition, without substantive financial support by the government, scientists would find it difficult to carry out large-scale projects because some scientific researches require a great amount of experimental raw materials and money, especially some rare resources which are entirely graspedby authorities. Thus, governments fund an investment a large number of manpower and financial resources that they must want to gain something in it, so thegovernments need to ensure that the experiment is on the basis of their estimating.

However, science plays an indispensablerole in any advanced, creative and burgeoning realms. Free research plays apositive effectiveness in increasing invention and progress. Too many restrictionsmay encumber the development of science that we can see in the past decade years. Official’s restriction of the scientific research not only controls the directions and goals of researches but the outcome and results of the research as well. Some scientists even disappeared later because of their threats to the safety and stability of the nation. As aresult, no significant discovery or invention occurred.

Moreover, it is obvious that the indemnification of most people’s benefits relies on the legitimate supervision of authority during the process of scientific research. By this I mean, scientific researchand development are a double-edged sword that can be used equally for good orevil. If not properly controlled, it will bring disasters to us. Some researches are beneficial for improving the development of society; however, atthe same time, they are awfully dangerous which are probable to kill millionsof people’s life in a blink of an eye due to an insignificant heedlessness. Forinstance, the investigation of nuclear energy is now one of main directions ofstudying and its extent of being observed is still continuously increasing. On one hand, it is universal acknowledge that nuclear energy will increasinglytake the place of current acquisition with energy, such as the wind power, the fire power, because of its efficient and almost bottomless provision of energy which can produce millions times energy at the equivalent condition.And on the other, the nuclear energy also has astonishing destructive force. Once a nuclear power plant was established in Chernobyl, an industrial city in the middle west of Russia, to stimulate the localeconomic development, but with the neglect of management nuclear reactor burntin it bringing Russian a crop of misfortunes.

In sum, from all the evidence discussed above, it can be concluded that only integrally should government place restrictions on scientific research and development in order to not limit the creativities and imaginations of science.

shawn_pysUID: 2770388

1# 咖啡盐
第一次改，好多地方都不确定，改的也不好，只是我的想法，不当之处还请多多体谅~
文章词汇量好大，佩服佩服~


69"Government should place few, if any,restrictions on scientific research and development"

Is it necessary for a government to exert (去掉over)many restrictions on scientific research and development? Some people assertthat science is indubitably a kind of pure subjects and should not be interveneby authority. However, from my perspective, scientific research and developmentare closely interrelated with our current way of life and also accompany acertain amount of danger, which may be out of control and threaten people’s health(这里用life是不是好一点？) withoutrestriction. Therefore, Government should implement an effective management tothese researches.


Generally speaking, scientists in the researchesare simple and easy to donate themselves into the experiments so that they arepossible to be misled and utilized to excogitate some dangerous things bycareerists which may bring disasters to our society, such as Human Cloning,biochemistry weapon, the nuclear bomb, without the controlling（这里不知道是什么意思，感觉删掉比较好）. In addition, without substantive financial support by thegovernment, scientists would find it difficult to carry out large-scaleprojects because some scientific researches require a great amount ofexperimental raw materials and money, especially some rare resources which areentirely grasped by authorities. Thus, governments fund an investment a largenumber of manpower and financial resources that they must want to gainsomething in it (wherethey must want to gain something), so the governments need to ensure that the experiment ison (following) the basis of their estimating.

However, science plays an indispensable role inany advanced, creative and burgeoning realms. Free research plays a positiveeffectiveness in increasing (enhancing) invention and progress. Too many restrictions may encumberthe development of science that we can see in the past decade years. Official’s restriction of the scientific research not onlycontrols the directions and goals of researches but the outcome and results ofthe research as well. Some scientists even disappeared later because of theirthreats to the safety and stability of the nation. As a result, (every scientist was so afraid to work out something perilous,that)no significant discovery or invention occurred.

Moreover, it is obvious that the indemnificationof most people’s benefits relies on the legitimate supervision of authorityduring the process of scientific research. By this I mean, scientific research anddevelopment are a double-edged sword that can be used equally for good or evil.If not properly controlled, it will bring disasters to us. Some researches are(research is) beneficial for improving the development of society;however, at the same time, they are awfully dangerous(,好像应该加吧)which are probable to kill millions of people’s life in a blink of an eye dueto an insignificant heedlessness. For instance, the investigation of nuclearenergy is now one of main directions of studying and its extent of beingobserved is still continuously increasing. On one hand, it is universalacknowledge that nuclear energy will increasingly take the place of currentacquisition with energy, such as the wind power,the fire power, because of its efficient and almost bottomless provision of energywhich can produce millions times energy at the equivalent condition. And on theother, the nuclear energy also has astonishing destructive force. Once anuclear power plant was established in Chernobyl, an industrial city in the MiddleWest of Russia, to stimulate the local economic development,but with the neglect of management nuclear reactor burnt in it bringing Russiana crop of misfortunes.


In sum, from all the evidence discussed above, itcan be concluded that only integrally should government place restrictions onscientific research and development in order to not limit the creativities andimaginations of science.

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

thx