寄托天下
查看: 918|回复: 0

[a习作temp] argument004 求拍~~ [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
72
注册时间
2010-8-18
精华
0
帖子
2
发表于 2011-1-16 11:39:07 |显示全部楼层
虽然估计没人帮我改……
不过我还是发上来吧~
然后去看看从前前辈们写的~~自己学习嘛~


The Arthur was benefit from the Adams Realty ten years ago. So he raised several reasons to recommend people to choose this agency to sell their home. The Adams Realty agency has more agents, large revenue last year and selling homes more quickly leave the Arthur a good impression. However, with these factors to prove the Arthur’s hypothesis that the Adams Realty is better seems not rational.
The Adams has more full-time agents is a sign of this company is bigger than Fitch to the Arthur. However, by taking the cost of stuff into consideration, a larger stuff always means more cost. Salaries paid to the stuff, social security benefit, and other cost may lead to a high cost ratio. The conduction that larger stuff means a larger company is not the case. In addition, with a larger stuff, Adams is more likely to earn higher revenue than Fitch as the Arthur has observed. Because it has more labor force, Adams has more chance to earn more. But how about the rate of the profit, is it higher than Fitch as well? The answer is probably no.
Ten years ago, the Arthur has an agency experience with Adams and sold his home within a month. He was quite appreciate it and thought that a month is quickly to sell a home. Without any statics about how long does it takes Fitch to sell a home, the Arthur draw the conclusion rather rashly. It is possible that ten years ago, Fitch only need half a month to sell, and even ten days now.
Finally, the Arthur argue that list your home with Adams you can get a good price. Such hypothesis is quite unfairly for the Arthur never refer to the price the agency sold for him. It is possible that Adams, with a larger stuff, will charge more than Fitch as commission, which will make the costumers spend more.
To sum up, the experience hiring Adams to sell home for the Arthur left him a good impression. But these impressions are not sufficient to buttress of the deduction that Adams is better than Fitch. The comparison should be made with more stable statics and observation, and more careful.


30min

使用道具 举报

RE: argument004 求拍~~ [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
argument004 求拍~~
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1224741-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部