argue 48 题目中2个“all citizens”的指代问题

liu2099801UID: 2970015

"242以全分析"里写到：
“论据说C城整体健康水平高同时电脑拥有量高，所以证明电脑没有造成健康下降。首先C城目前的健康水平如何论者没有提供资料，只是说二十年前C城一半的居民达标，那么目前在全国只有四分之一的人达标的情况下，C城的情况如何，我们不能排除C城比全国水平低的可能。”

题目里哪里说道“1/4”的健康者是“全国”的啊？应该还是针对C城说的吧？

就算说的是“全国”，C城和全国用的是同一个健康标准，怎么可能“C城比全国水平低”，再低也不会低于所规定的健康标准吧？


很有可能是我把题理解错了错了，希望大家帮我翻译一下题啊！！最好就直接给出48题的准确中文翻译吧！！


先谢谢啦！！

liu2099801UID: 2970015

麻烦大家帮帮我！！谢啦！！

咖啡盐UID: 2973669

When you asked a question, you should show us the original text.

liu2099801UID: 2970015

sorry!
原题：

48, （健康，社会/论断，预言/大并列小递进）The following appeared in a newspaper article published in the country of Corpora.
"Twenty years ago, one half of all citizens in Corpora met the standards for adequate physical fitness as then defined by the national advisory board on physical fitness. Today, the board says that only one quarter of all citizens are adequately fit and suggests that spending too much time using computers may be the reason. But since overall fitness levels are highest in regions of Corpora where levels of computer ownership are also highest, it is clear that using computers has not made citizens less physically fit. Instead, as shown by this year's unusually low expenditures on fitness-related products and services, the recent decline in the economy is most likely the cause(5), and fitness levels will improve when the economy does."

liu2099801UID: 2970015

分析是：
48.        Corpora,physical fitness （健康，社会/论断，预言/大并列小递进）★★★题目的翻译有问题吧？
结论：经济形式好了，健康水平会提高。目前全国健康协会说只有四分一的市民身体达标，而此时与健康有关的产品和服务上的开支异常地低。另外虽然全国协会说健康水平下降是多用电脑造成的，但本城的健康水平高同时电脑拥有量也高，所以显然电脑不是不健康的原因。
•论断的前提不一定成立。论断的前提是经济形式好了，人们在健康产品和服务上的开支就会上升，但这不一定成立。论者没有提供资料证明目前这方面的低开销主要是由于经济不景气造成，或是人们的钱多了就一定会增加这方面的开支。也有可能是目前健康产品和服务不能满足大家的要求，或是服务质量不好。The low expenditures on fitness-related products do not necessarily resulted from the decline in the economy. (NCR) ★★★
•论证的论据没有说服力。（1）论据说C城整体健康水平高同时电脑拥有量高，所以证明电脑没有造成健康下降。首先C城目前的健康水平如何论者没有提供资料，只是说二十年前C城一半的居民达标，那么目前在全国只有四分之一的人达标的情况下，C城的情况如何，我们不能排除C城比全国水平低的可能。（题目什么时候把“全国”扯进来了！？文中前后二个“all citizens”到底指C城的，还是有一个是指“全国”的？还有C城和全国用的是同一个健康标准，怎么可能“C城比全国水平低”，再低也不会低于所规定的健康标准吧？）Although the regions mentioned by the author have relatively highest fitness levels, it is still possible that their fitness levels are declining compared with themselves. (confusing variation and comparison) ★★★★
其次电脑拥有量高不代表使用电脑时间长。High levels of computer ownership do not indicate that citizens of these regions will spend more time on using computers. (U.C) ★★★
（2）The standard for fitness may vary during past 20 years. ( P→F) ★★★★
•论者结论武断：经济形式好了，人们在与健康有关的产品和服务上的开支增加了，人们健康水平就会提升。但没有证据证明这项开支与人的健康水平有必然联系，甚至没有证据证明这些产品和服务一定能提高人们的健康水平。The low expenditures on fitness-related products and services may not directly result in low level of fitness. (NCR) ★★★★
The author fails to convince us that once the economy improves, people will spend more money on fitness-related products and services, and their fitness levels will therefore be improved. (sufficiency of the conclusion) ★★★★开支增加不是健康的充分条件
结论：论者要加要说服力还需要提供资料显示健康产品和服务能多大程度上帮助人们提高健康水平，而目前人们对于这项花销的看如何，是什么导致了开支的下降。

liu2099801UID: 2970015

就是分析中攻击论据中的“（1）”没看懂。。