argue 2 第一篇arguea，求狠拍~！

xiaoxiyxxUID：2810716

2.The following appeared in a letter sent by a committee of homeowners
from the Deerhaven Acres to all homeowners in Deerhaven Acres.

"Seven years ago, homeowners in nearby Brookville community adopted a set
of restrictions on how the community's yards should be landscaped and what
colors the exteriors of homes should be painted. Since then, average
property values have tripled in Brookville. In order to raise property
values in Deerhaven Acres, we should adopt our own set of restrictions on
landscaping and housepainting."

七年前，附近的Brookville社区的业主实施了一系列关于该社区的庭院应如何布置以及房屋应涂何种颜色的规定。从那以后，Brookville的地产平均价格翻了三番。为使Deerhaven
Acres的地产升值，我们也应该对于景观和房屋涂色实施自己的规定。





While the average property values have tripled since house owners in Brookville community adopted a unified standard for their houses, it seems reasonable for the committee of Deerhaven Acres to similarly set up their own restrictions on landscaping and house painting so that they can raise their property values like Brookville community. Nevertheless, due to the absence of enough investigates and survey, this measure, which fails to demonstrates itself to be effective, can not necessarily be the most practical and valid way to reach to the committee’s target.

The committee firstly needs to figure out whether the ascendant of property values in Brookville community is brought by their set of restrictions on their houses. With nothing mentioned about some possible changes inside the community, it’s at least likely that during 7 years after the community adopted that set, the commercial or tourist industrial has developed a lot, or that the facilities and amenities in the community have improved significantly, which can definitely lead to the uptrend of property values in Brookville. Consequently, some more through investigates about the substantial reasons for the rising trends of Brookville community are wanted in order to make the argument more forceful.

Given that the raise of property values in Brookville community is all because of the sets adopted 7 years ago, the situation of Deerhaven Acres is not probably the same with that of Brookville community, in spite that they are, as the letter tells, quite close to each other. There can inevitably be some differences in transportation, economic condition, community function, and the features of house owners. Therefore, no one can tell whether the results of Brookville community can also happen to Deerhaven Acres community. In that case, it is necessary for the committee of Deerhaven Acres to inquiry certain distinguishes between the two communities.

Finally, it’s essential to point out that only if there are more people who are willing to house in the community will the property values of Deerhaven Acres ascend. In the meanwhile, however, the committee fails to take people’s favor and taste into consideration, that is to say, people may be averse to the analogous appearances which reveal no character at all. Furthermore, the compulsory measure can cause people’s dissatisfaction. All these may impel many house owners to move out of the community, let alone that more people would like to move in the community. In consequence, the committee should inspect some house owners’ opinions and suggestions on the feasibility of that adoption.

To sum up, the argument for the measure of restrictions in the community’s landscape based on the case of nearby community can give Deerhaven Acres an opportunity to raise the property values. However, before the committee make a conclusion, they should investigate more on the main reasons of the raise in property values in Brookville community, on the differences between the two communities, and the most importantly, on the viewpoint of the house owners. Only in that way can the committee arrive at the most efficient and favorable solutions to raise the property values.

xiaoxiyxxUID：2810716

看样子木人鸟了~自己先顶吧~